Mr.BishopBoth of you, rank your top 3.
Overall Impression counts for the most. How much you liked it, style, wow factor.
Technicality next.
Creative use of terrain/features after that - balance equally with tech.
Finally a small portion of it should be about how quality the filming/editing is.
Rank top 3 - GO!
meeks here- ahmet, will and tom. In no particular order, all of em were so killer I would almost say this event is impossible to judge but so rad to get some money into this side of the sport which I think we all can agree, is much more exciting and relevant than comp skiing. Cant say this was rigged by any means, no matter who was the judge it was just a toss up and comes down to personal preference on what individuals want to see and consider to be the most impressive. Apples to Oranges, I mean Cam and Clayton went so huge as always, and while I personally prefer to watch that type of skiing over smaller/ "creative" street shit I was more impressed by will's video because it seemed so much more ahead of the game, on some shit that has never been done before or possibly ever duplicated level, where as cam and claytons video's seemed to be just more of a progression from previous film parts (which was fucking awesome at the same time). At the end of the day, it was just a crapshoot anyone could have and should have one. Why dwell on the stupid details of a judged ski comp instead of celebrating the fact that ESPN decided to throw support towards one of the coolest aspects of freeskiing, and we got to see arguably the 6 most impressive segments of the year in February instead of August, what a treat.
