Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

4frnt or dynastar

profile picture
down-kink-down
Posts: 37 - Karma: 10
I am going to get a new pair of skis.
I am considering dynastar trouble makers and the 4frnt STL.
which ski would be the better ski.
Jan 17 2005 10:05AM
0 0
profile picture
zelz
Posts: 102 - Karma: 10
DYNASTAR!
Jan 17 2005 11:59AM
0 0
profile picture
freestyleskier900
Posts: 7 - Karma: 10
get volkl v pros there sick skis
Jan 17 2005 12:06PM
0 0
profile picture
lechef
Posts: 1111 - Karma: 36
if you'll slide rail get the 4frnt
Jan 17 2005 3:14PM
0 0
profile picture
skiforhead
Posts: 101 - Karma: 12
boht skis are really sick, the TM is super soft for butters and a ton of presses. the stls are soft in the tip and tail so u can still do butters and be able to ski them on hard pack, the stls a dope cant go wrong with them

pray for snow
Jan 17 2005 3:39PM
0 0
profile picture
aclsarescary
Posts: 4010 - Karma: 31
4FRNT.
Jan 17 2005 4:39PM
0 0
profile picture
aclsarescary
Posts: 4010 - Karma: 31
I'm pretty sure-not scienticily-that by owning and riding 4FRNTS, make you a better skier.
Jan 17 2005 4:41PM
0 0
profile picture
dontH8innovate
Posts: 762 - Karma: 10
4FRNT
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'Nobody spends more time on his knees than George W. Bush.' - Shaggy

If you ski in Massachusetts join the Mass-ive Cult, message me and you're in!!!!

THE WORST PART ABOUT BEING ATLANTASKI IS BEING A IGNORANT RED-NECK

'... Osama Bin Laden then closed the video with this statemeant 'I'M RICK JAMES, BITCH!!!' which show us all he does is sit around and watch TV' - John Stewart
Jan 17 2005 5:21PM
0 0
profile picture
-daniel-
Posts: 316 - Karma: 10
Ya if you plan on doing rails definetly go with 4frnts. The TM's edges will get destroyed on rails
Jan 17 2005 5:43PM
0 0
profile picture
CTD
Posts: 6300 - Karma: 348
ask around, EVERYONE who was on tms last year is on stls. they are way sick. durrable, mountains of pop (and it last unlike the tm) and they are alot lighter.



i looked on google but all i could find was 3D Animation porn-sxmarty6



ECS headwear, hit me up!
Jan 17 2005 7:25PM
0 0
profile picture
Jenna1106
Posts: 3012 - Karma: 10
dynastar
________________________________________



[And if someday I find my peace of mind]

[I will share my wealth with all of human kind]
Jan 17 2005 7:26PM
0 0
profile picture
martockpublicenemy
Posts: 2284 - Karma: 11
how could you possibly say dynastar?
Oh excellent,time for a sexy party!-Stewie Griffin

4frnt skis
Jan 17 2005 7:38PM
0 0
profile picture
selfportrait
Posts: 1632 - Karma: 16
ok everyone, let's get our act together.

tms are an amazing ski. more pop than anything else (that i've skied, anyway {which include stls}), and an awesome ski on groomers. they are a bit heavier than other skis, but that is not really an issue. as for durability? i have one crack. that is all, the rest is comestic. of course we have all heard the horror stories, but don't kid yourself, these are an awe ski.

4frnt stl are also a very nice ski. quite poppy (although i still believe that tms have got them when it comes to pop), and a smooth riding ski. these are lighter than tms, if that is an issue for you. i'm not so sure about durability, but i have already seen some nasty things from 4frnts (see mikees post).

all i'm asking is you do not say: ''trouble makers fall apert, 4frnt is badass because they are''

.CCR.
impact
Jan 17 2005 9:40PM
0 0
profile picture
nychka
Posts: 1787 - Karma: 61
4frnt without a doubt
Jan 17 2005 9:56PM
0 0
profile picture
selfportrait
Posts: 1632 - Karma: 16
fuck.

.CCR.
impact
Jan 17 2005 10:00PM
0 0
profile picture
i8van
Posts: 2953 - Karma: 230
4FRNT
Jan 17 2005 10:06PM
0 0
profile picture
NBCskier
Posts: 3877 - Karma: -289
4frnt

SGB



'how about u call it a double grab? or a japical or critinap'-pussyfooter

Jan 17 2005 10:10PM
0 0
profile picture
*rkp*
Posts: 8198 - Karma: 257
god fucking dammit 4frnt!!!!!! there is no comparison!!!
Jan 17 2005 10:16PM
0 0
profile picture
aclsarescary
Posts: 4010 - Karma: 31
We have all seen much worse pictures of the Trouble makers than of the 4frnts. If you remember a year ago at this time everyones tm's were falling apart, and they were pasting them all over this website. way more than the two people that have had problems with their 4's.
Jan 17 2005 10:57PM
0 0
profile picture
kolekaine
Posts: 1456 - Karma: 116
4frnt all the way
Jan 17 2005 11:26PM
0 0
profile picture
BillyMFBadass
Posts: 576 - Karma: 10
^i definatley concur
wouldnt shit ya, you're my favorite terd


'i need to start doin some sweet grabs'-BJ
Jan 18 2005 12:22AM
0 0
profile picture
down-kink-down
Posts: 37 - Karma: 10
Thanks for all the info.
I am going to go with 4frnt they are lighter and like 50.00 cheaper.
Jan 18 2005 9:16AM
0 0
profile picture
FUUUCK
Posts: 18426 - Karma: 4,888
tons of people on this site have switched from dynastar to 4frnt
___________________________________________________






k2 05 06
Jan 18 2005 11:14AM
0 0
profile picture
eastAR5
Posts: 15084 - Karma: 730
I have both tm's and 4frnts and theyre both sick. But I'd say go with 4frnt and support a dope company



*Welcome to the dub ski radio show*





Jan 18 2005 2:51PM
0 0
profile picture
Localboyz
Posts: 1626 - Karma: 19
DYNAFUCKINGSTAR...
Jan 18 2005 6:55PM
0 0
profile picture
mikee
Posts: 7813 - Karma: 5
ahaha, chris. Goood work. People use your brains.

-Michael Lifshitz-
Jibberishradical
www.absoluteskishop.com
Jan 18 2005 7:17PM
0 0
profile picture
Sharpy
Posts: 7596 - Karma: 19
I was on dynastars last eya rand I am still on dynastars. I wonder how many people saying boo dynastar have actually ridden them or have just gone with the flow of the site. Don't be idiots and think for yourself.



Like a virgin on prom night



A few soft moans



You can go on the bottom bunk and finish it yourself



When you guys are on those rails, it's like muah



You A-hole
Jan 18 2005 7:26PM
0 0
profile picture
CTD
Posts: 6300 - Karma: 348
yeah, i was on tms last year, and am on 4frnts right now. how can you say the tms have more pop? maybe out of a pipe, but that snappiness only last a few weeks. and they were way to damp to ollie. i couldnt get those fuckers more than 6 inches off the ground. on line 1260s and my stls, i can easily get 1-2 ft off the ground. and unlike the tms, which were noodles halfway throught the season, my 4frnts still feel new. plus, the tm is really nose heavy, and they were a bitch on rails. they are sick skis for jumping and pipe, but unless thats all you plan on doing, the 4frnts are a WAY, WAY, better ski, in pretty much all aspects.



i looked on google but all i could find was 3D Animation porn-sxmarty6



ECS headwear, hit me up!
Jan 18 2005 7:50PM
0 0
profile picture
neatnir69
Posts: 329 - Karma: 20
stl 183




MIDWEST REPRESENT
Jan 18 2005 7:55PM
0 0
profile picture
$FREESKIER$
Posts: 168 - Karma: 26
DYNASTAR NOT 4FRONT

May 17 2005 1:14PM
0 0
profile picture
crooks
Posts: 14693 - Karma: 786
dynastars dont holp up well on rails but if u dont grind get them otherwise get the stls

May 17 2005 3:00PM
0 0
profile picture
Ryanvdonk
Posts: 12811 - Karma: 1,971
i agree that dynastars have good pop, but i have had concepts and have borrowed TMs from a friend and can tell you one thing, the edges do not hold up, I borrowed the TMs after a foot of edge fell out, i came back a week later with thre new cracks in his skis.

My other friend has lines and has not had any problems, they make quality skis.

May 18 2005 1:58AM
0 0
profile picture
KeegLove
Posts: 10166 - Karma: 55
it depends what you ski mostly, if your a park kinda guy then 4frnt is deffinatley the way to go however if u are one that shreds the pow dynastar is the route you'll want to take.

-Keegan McGinnis.
-newschoolers.com.
-ski for life.
-nwft.
May 18 2005 3:05AM
0 0
profile picture
Alpine3
Posts: 1811 - Karma: 24
are you going to be skiing 100 % park?

May 18 2005 4:41PM
0 0
profile picture
Fairview
Posts: 430 - Karma: 33
How is dynastar the ski you would want for pow? The TM has about a 78 waist. All the 4frnts are fatter. The new big trouble is only a 92 waist, and they finally are coming out with it next season. If anything, Dynastar is the last company you want a pow ski from.

May 18 2005 4:51PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)