Member of the Month

Dlonetti
August, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

[pics] new dynastar twin

profile picture
dood
Posts: 169 - Karma: 14
hi all
here is a new dynastar twin

i don't know the name but i guess it's the new trouble maker (seen @ tignes yesterday)




.|:|:| www.SkipasS.com |:|:|.
Jan 13 2005 5:09PM
0 0
profile picture
MrPantyDropper
Posts: 5016 - Karma: 65
blizzards are better haha
Jan 13 2005 6:46PM
0 0
profile picture
MrPantyDropper
Posts: 5016 - Karma: 65
whered you find the pic?
Jan 13 2005 7:14PM
0 0
profile picture
TwinTipWonder
Posts: 1078 - Karma: 10
Yikes. Sick skis, just need to recognize tip and tail. The tails even look fatter than the tips(prolly cuz they are)
AbsoluteSkiShop.com
Jan 13 2005 7:15PM
0 0
profile picture
AmbushClothing
Posts: 1616 - Karma: 202
look ate the tips, there smallaer than tha tails. there deff mounted backwards
Jan 13 2005 7:20PM
0 0
profile picture
MrPantyDropper
Posts: 5016 - Karma: 65
yeah they are..kinda funny
Jan 13 2005 7:20PM
0 0
profile picture
GFskier
Posts: 72 - Karma: 9
sick! they do look backasswards though...



phat to splat!
Jan 13 2005 7:27PM
0 0
profile picture
DietCoke
Posts: 1317 - Karma: 7
Either they put the bindings on backwards or those things are fucked up. The tips are shorter then the tails, and narrower. It looks re-god-damn-diculous

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_



If hate were people, I'd be China.
Jan 13 2005 7:33PM
0 0
profile picture
lanks
Posts: 12543 - Karma: 72
its been a long time coming. good work dynastar.

-Joel



~Phunkin Phatt Phreerider~

Capital City Rider

Dragons Lair



I don't condone this.
Jan 13 2005 8:11PM
0 0
profile picture
newschooler7
Posts: 2253 - Karma: 21
those are insane
build it, try it, huck it
Jan 13 2005 8:12PM
0 0
profile picture
i8van
Posts: 2953 - Karma: 230
those are so sick
Jan 13 2005 8:13PM
0 0
profile picture
OnionKing
Posts: 166 - Karma: 17
I get the feeling on this site that people will like anything new no matter what it is. Personally I think these new releases whether it be the 'foil' and this ski look mediocre if not even lamer then past skis.
Jan 13 2005 8:15PM
0 0
profile picture
LittleDevil720
Posts: 3719 - Karma: 8
sicckkk



'Ever been hit in the head with a golf ball?'
-JF Cusson, making the argument that golf is an extreme sport

Jan 13 2005 8:22PM
0 0
profile picture
telestar6
Posts: 2102 - Karma: 44
I forget the dimensions but I know they are slightly wider than the Scratch BC but narrower than the Pistols. They look pretty sweet. I'm guessing they are mounted they way they are becuase someone was trying them out switch in the powder.

I think rails in general are just a phase. - Anthony Boronowski



*NWFT*
Jan 13 2005 9:01PM
0 0
profile picture
MrPantyDropper
Posts: 5016 - Karma: 65
97mm waist?
Jan 13 2005 9:03PM
0 0
profile picture
rocktheLPs
Posts: 2095 - Karma: 14
^ doesnt look that fat, im gonna say around 80, and they do look like they are mounted backwards
______________________
yeah funkin right kid
shut the funk up
Jan 13 2005 9:06PM
0 0
profile picture
MrPantyDropper
Posts: 5016 - Karma: 65
theyre the big trouble..bigger than the troublemaker and they are over 90mm waist...trouble makers are gunna be 80mm i think
Jan 13 2005 9:08PM
0 0
profile picture
cvlive08
Posts: 531 - Karma: 10
yeah i want 2
Jan 13 2005 9:09PM
0 0
profile picture
JFerg
Posts: 2440 - Karma: 62
nooo they are not mounted backwards. they are mounted correctly. yet slightly forward mount. and the tail is wider than the nose by 3mm, and the waist is 89-91 mm, i cant remember exactly.

_________________________

just ski.
Jan 13 2005 9:16PM
0 0
profile picture
MrPantyDropper
Posts: 5016 - Karma: 65
woah..wont that suck for powder..the tail will have more float causing nosedives?
Jan 13 2005 9:17PM
0 0
profile picture
Girays_Brother
Posts: 13973 - Karma: 1,635
they are sick
___________________



I HATE NEW YORK PRODUCTIONS

i hate new york trailer



LOGIC HEADWARE> A WAY TO KEEP UR HEAD WARM LOGIC HEADWARE

Jan 13 2005 9:27PM
0 0
profile picture
DynastarriderGP
Posts: 8258 - Karma: 214
SWEET!!!
Minor Threat Trailer

Peter: When you go on a cruise you need to build up a base tan.
Chris: But I heard that in tanning booths you can get something called Melenoma
Peter: Don't worry son that's just fancy talk for sexified.


Member 957,647,789,468,952,001,657
Jan 13 2005 9:41PM
0 0
profile picture
jflo453
Posts: 1383 - Karma: 26
they look like theyre past center mounted
Ski New Jersey
Jan 13 2005 9:51PM
0 0
profile picture
freeskinow
Posts: 617 - Karma: 12
do the flames make them go faster?





'You've got to run like an antelope, out of control'
Jan 13 2005 10:02PM
0 0
profile picture
pete15015
Posts: 355 - Karma: 11
The tails are bigger the nthe tips why?

Jan 13 2005 10:06PM
0 0
profile picture
zerospinskier
Posts: 4867 - Karma: 350
okay we get it, everyone thinks they are mounted slightly forward, or backwards, u dont needa say it anymore. how bout we wait and see when they come out instead of guessing...and sweet skis by the way
Jan 13 2005 10:34PM
0 0
profile picture
TonyMantana
Posts: 69 - Karma: 10
gay as fuck dude
BUY NINTHWARD SKIS
Jan 13 2005 11:50PM
0 0
profile picture
Nihiriju
Posts: 2061 - Karma: 27
Can you please tell me whats up with the mounting?!?! it loks soo wacked


HÉLmµT- HiGh SNow!
Jan 14 2005 12:42AM
0 0
profile picture
n0gga
Posts: 1053 - Karma: 103
those are so fucking sick!!
big tail prolly makes switch landings and such in powder more effordless.
________________
www.skiforumet.no
Dynastar skis
Smith Optics

I ski switch
Jan 14 2005 9:39AM
0 0
profile picture
novotony
Posts: 193 - Karma: 8
Those are mounted correctly that is next years big trouble
Jan 14 2005 9:48AM
0 0
profile picture
skifiend
Posts: 2063 - Karma: 13
^novotony...can you shed some light on the mounting question. Those do look forward of core center, for a fat ski I guess I don't see any advantage to that mounting point.

Smuggs kicks ass



Fat skis, Tight trees
Jan 14 2005 10:04AM
0 0
profile picture
Ryno
Posts: 31125 - Karma: 336
with that mounting (and maybe the persepctive) they look quite fucked up
___________________________________________________




A view on the downfall of the US by 221: 'godzilla man. he's gonna show up and shit will hit the fan.'



ellermann -> i hope you realize you just threw yourselves a birthday party online. just think about that for a little while



Ryan V.G



~~Phunkin Phatt Phreerider~~

Dragons Lair
Jan 14 2005 10:08AM
0 0
profile picture
*cowboy*
Posts: 8830 - Karma: 214
I definently thought they were the other way around. VERY stylie though!

-Jason

[www.theonlywarehouse.com]

[www.option5team.com]
Jan 14 2005 10:11AM
0 0
profile picture
Gnl.Weirdness
Posts: 3867 - Karma: 20
Ok have any of you who say they suck actually ridden them? I rode them for most of last year and all summer, granted I hit no rails on them, and they where awsome. Just providing another point of view. And yes those looks sick.
Jan 14 2005 11:03AM
0 0
profile picture
gabeski
Posts: 576 - Karma: 103
Nice graphics, I think I would clip in with my heal in the toepiece. Fatter tails and forward mount seem unnecessary.
Jan 14 2005 11:11AM
0 0
profile picture
Fala
Posts: 376 - Karma: 15
soooooooooooo hot!!!!!!!! I want them!!!!
Jan 14 2005 11:39AM
0 0
profile picture
FUJATIVE24
Posts: 241 - Karma: 8
i want those skis!!
Jan 14 2005 12:37PM
0 0
profile picture
devine
Posts: 1720 - Karma: 10
i like the old look

member#13687



'i just rented good will hunting , how is it?'

'lets put it this way, even matt damon cant make it suck.'

'matt damon? hes in con air right?'

'yes , yes he is.'
Jan 14 2005 12:43PM
0 0
profile picture
Grammar_Nazi
Posts: 796 - Karma: 20
who wants to fucking ride dynastar...LINE is tha shit
Jan 14 2005 12:46PM
0 0
profile picture
Grammar_Nazi
Posts: 796 - Karma: 20
SO GAY....go line
Jan 14 2005 12:52PM
0 0
profile picture
schmies
Posts: 2032 - Karma: 505
Flames......soooooo hot right now.
Jan 14 2005 1:42PM
0 0
profile picture
skifiend
Posts: 2063 - Karma: 13
Can somebody who actually knows something about these skis answer this question...Are those mounted forward of core center?...and if they are, what's the advantages of that?

Enough of this, 'they look cool' 'they're gay' 'buy lines'...lets get some real info

Smuggs kicks ass



Fat skis, Tight trees
Jan 14 2005 1:54PM
0 0
profile picture
skogenjake
Posts: 6685 - Karma: 511
those are gay i hope the TMS are better


This is better than freeipods they dont spam you-help me out i swear it works- free ipod or other mp3 player and you only have to put 7 bucks into doing an offer.
http://www.mp3players4free.com/default.aspx?r=14896
2
^dont forget the 2!
Jan 14 2005 3:01PM
0 0
profile picture
schmies
Posts: 2032 - Karma: 505
I am so surprised that the snow is not melting beneath them! Sooooooooo hot!!
Jan 14 2005 3:37PM
0 0
profile picture
MrPantyDropper
Posts: 5016 - Karma: 65
why would you diss artwork if you make your own?wouldnt you feel like shit if people kept saying your artwork sucked?
Jan 14 2005 8:41PM
0 0
profile picture
corey74
Posts: 658 - Karma: 13
OMG i think i just pissed my self lol those skies are SICK!!!!!!!!
Jan 14 2005 8:44PM
0 0
profile picture
selfportrait
Posts: 1632 - Karma: 16
wow. those graphics are a big disapointment. anyway, they look awesome, even though they look just about unridable mounted like that.

.CCR.
impact
Jan 14 2005 9:07PM
0 0
profile picture
OReJow
Posts: 1739 - Karma: 9
the TM's look exactly the same as the Big Trouble's except they fade to white instead of black at the tails.
------

free ipod

------

Jan 14 2005 9:43PM
0 0
profile picture
missy
Posts: 559 - Karma: 11
i cant believe someone said the first trouble makers were a let down.


--
Jan 15 2005 12:19AM
0 0
profile picture
jibtastic
Posts: 4391 - Karma: 67
the mounting on those skis is gnarly. backwards..? ..super forward mount?

sick looking though.



------------------

Formerly known as jibEmpyre.



'skiboards look horrible on rails, they do however looking amazing over 15 foot tables.'

-mommy on snowlerbladlerering
Jan 15 2005 12:30AM
0 0
profile picture
skihillraod
Posts: 1852 - Karma: 45
I think the pic in freeskier is the other way around (which looks correct to me) I wouldn't want a ski with a fatter tail than tip.
The brake bending is really good those look like wide brakes on a p18.
Jan 15 2005 1:15AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)