MLBI think you guys read into it weird. Sure you could say that ISIS is a product of western nations, but has anybody thought that ISIS could just be a product of richer Arab nations? Think about this In the past two years OPEC has suddenly opened up its oil supply and the price of crude has dropped below 50$ a barrel. This also coninsided with US and Russia pumping up production. By doing this they crippled domestic oil production which was distroying their business model. So they outbid the U.S. And Russia on oil....keep the area in turmoil (Syria for Russia and Iraq for the U.S.) so that the U.S. and Russia are drawn into perpertual conflict allowing OPEC to profit from massive oil sales. Basically just comes down to money.
Also to fully get rid of ISIS first you need to solve the civil war in Syria first. That is a giant cluster fuck to begin with and with Russia and Iran involved it looks like it isn't getting any simpler.
Then even if you have all those issues resolved you still have you end ISIS with ground troops and deal with their funding ( which as I said before means dealing with OPEC nations who are secretly funding these operations). Also you have to finally deal with the Sunni and Shia grievances in those two nations on top of having to deal with the Kurds wanting their own country at the end of this.
Honestly it isn't the Muslim issue that's the problem its proxy wars by nations with interests that's the problem. It's the oil in the area and who will profit from it that's the problem. You either go in full with troops and wage war there for 20 more years ( on top of the 20 we have been there for already) or you pull out and let all of them deal with their own bullshit once and for all. Either way it's all fucked.
Exactly, I think Putin decided that he had to play ball with the ISIS.
Russia is allied with Syria and he has been outspoken in the past against US action in Libya and elsewhere. So when Obama's supposed redline was crossed in 2013, (Chemical weapons attack, which was not orchestrated by Assad but rather by the free Syrian army), Russia put in a show of force. The people rejected Obama's entreaty to go to war in Syria, so they used proxies, ISIS/ISIL to destabilize the region.
ISIS enabled the US to pursue a campaign and not ostensibly interfere with Russia and China's ally. ISIS has spurned US support for general action in the region, but the action has been focused on overthrowing/ousting Assad, not ISIS.
Russia could have called the US out, and had, but it was falling on deaf ears. So Putin upped his game; can't beat 'em, join 'em. Russia actually started targeting ISIS which severely disrupted the US campaign against Assad.
If Russia defeated, ISIS, then they were defeating America's reason to interfere in the region. So they are now trying to sideswipe the entire ISIS issue by motivating people to go to war with Assad. It’s clear that we intend to go to war and our target, just like with 9/11 and Iraq, are the people who weren't involved.
The US has been fueling the conflict with these proxy armies. The US needs to take control of Syria, just as Russia needs to.
The United States and coalition forces in Syria are losing, Russia and Assad have taken over control of Aleppo.
In regards to the Paris attacks, a lot of people are saying it was a false flag. The French president has decided to go ahead and bomb the Islamic State in Syria, however, they are also bombing the infrastructure of Syria, they’ll be going after Assad in Syria. At the same time Russia’s air campaign aided in the Syrian army offensive and they have taken back Aleppo.
It’s funny because while all this is happening western intelligence agencies are saying that because "we can not break the encryption because of what Edward Snowdon did, the terrorists know how we pick up their chatter." Personally, I don’t think ISIS is going to be planning out their next attack on Facebook or twitter, why even communicate on the internet? There are far more private ways to organize and plan for the next attack.
We know that the coalition forces were losing ground in Syria. We know that Russia’s air campaign started to destroy the islamic state in Syria in a little over three months. This is something the US was suppose to be doing since 2013, however we know that they were not bombing ISIS but rather the infrastructure of Syria.
I’m going to play devils advocate here but maybe they needed some kind of event to distract everyone. They want us to be fearful, scared, nervous, they want us to fear ISIS and rightfully so. The corporate media has said that officials found a Syrian passport on one of the dead terrorists, however, when we look at the perpetrators of the attack we see that two of the attackers were born in the suburbs of France, one in Drancy, three lived in Belgium, and we later find out that the Syrian passport was a forgery. I mean whenever you go and terrorize the public and blow yourself up, always bring your passport. We saw this back in 9/11 when the passports survived the North Tower plane explosion, as well as the Charlie Hebdo. The operatives were also armed with automatic weapons, explosive belts, how could they have entered and attacked these sites, completely unnoticed?
So there’s been a political agenda, the incident inspired intense emotion, French authorities already knew who the terrorists were, and of course the corporate media says that one of the attackers screamed "I’m from ISIS" and then stated the reason for the shooting, “this is for Syria.” I mean come on, it is so transparent that the west is using this tragedy to fuel their foreign and political interests. I mean the French President came right out and said it was the Islamic States before any investigation was conducted, he just knows. Yeah, okay.
48 hours prior to the attacks, a massive cyberattack took down the French mobile data network and blinded police surveillance. Officials stated that “it was a very sophisticated attack.” All of this might have been planned. The US is urging France and Turkey to put special forces down in Syria. Obama, has stated that ground troops would be a grave mistake, but he’s lying. He said we should have at least 10,000 or another 5,000 but no more.
That was my last post ever, bye forever.
