A quick word on blocking ads
It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
JAHpowThere was a thread about this but it got deleted because the title was "Are women good at anything?" and in the op it said women can't even win their own award.
Sooo yeahh...
Sno.I included a poll-- don't know why it didn't show up.
DingoSeanNamed by who?
...and who gives a shit either way. Would you rather it be Kim Cardassian?
TOAST.Glamour Magazine, which is a really important publication. Honestly you are upset by her getting the award I feel bad for you, whether you think she should even be considered or not, its a pointless title by a pointless magazine.
DingoSeanWait, you said Glamour is an important publication, and then you say it's a pointless title by a pointless magazine hahaha
...In any case, Glamour is not an important publication at all.
DingoSeanWait, you said Glamour is an important publication, and then you say it's a pointless title by a pointless magazine hahaha
...In any case, Glamour is not an important publication at all.
pat_in_the_hatthis is disgusting. the entire family needs to disappear. The woman of the year award should go to Kristen Griest and Shaye Haver. The first two woman US Army Rangers. But instead its a cross dresser. This is whats wrong with the media today
Fred_BearSo women cant even win their own awards? Lol
Fred_BearSo women cant even win their own awards? Lol
no_steezeaka she "looks good"
JAHpowThere was a thread about this but it got deleted because the title was "Are women good at anything?" and in the op it said women can't even win their own award.
Sooo yeahh...
FapMasterFLEXwho cares. But for jokes, has she been a woman for a full year? Is that a requirement?
no_steezeI just don't care. If she wanted to become a woman then she can be a woman. The only thing that bothers me is people talking about how "good of a job" she did becoming a woman, aka she "looks good" which is 100% missing the point and has nothing to do with any of it
safarisamBeing transgender is different than being a cross dresser.
That being said, I don't think she deserved it. Their are plenty of women who are in STEM or Rangers, or doing more with their time than being a public figure for popularity's sake.
daxtonCouldn't agree more.
She's also a terrible icon for the transgender community, and unfairly winning all of these awards just because of her popularity doesn't help. It only causes more hate from those that have no other knowledge of trans people besides what they hear from the media.
Her entire attempt at raising awareness and acceptance just blew up in her face.
safarisamYeah. A few of my Trans friends aren't stoked with her. They're glad she's making them visible- but at what cost? How is she more brave than my friend who slept on the streets because her family rejected her????
DJtearegasscience suggest anyone who believes themselves to be a different gender is mentally ill
unfortunately further research into this theory won't receive funding thanks to PC retards
Rachyoooor.... science has shown that everyone starts the same and that a few weeks in testosterone either makes you male or doesn't. Then... a few weeks later, hormones are vital in turning on and off some 50 other genes that control different areas of what makes up gender identity. .... so there's that
BogsAnd don't forget that gender identity is cultural, not scientific. There are cultures out there who believe that more than two genders exist. It's so ingrained in us that most people never even consider that our culture's definition of gender could be less than absolute.
BogsAnd don't forget that gender identity is cultural, not scientific. There are cultures out there who believe that more than two genders exist. It's so ingrained in us that most people never even consider that our culture's definition of gender could be less than absolute.
Rachyoooor.... science has shown that everyone starts the same and that a few weeks in testosterone either makes you male or doesn't. Then... a few weeks later, hormones are vital in turning on and off some 50 other genes that control different areas of what makes up gender identity. .... so there's that
DJtearegasehhhh no.
youtube milo yiannopolous if you want an easy to follow explanation of the facts
BurgyJust because someone was biologically a male or is still biologically a male, does not mean they are not a women. If you have always cognitively and conscientiously seen yourself as a women in your mind and have always that spiritually your are a women, then you should be considered a women.
Sno.I would have to disagree with you here. Being a "woman" is not a spiritual state of mind, the definition of a woman is an adult female, and the definition of a female is:
1.
of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically
Do I have a problem with Bruce Jenner transitioning to become female? No. But bending biological definitions just for the sake of being politically correct is a little bizarre to me.
RachyYes, I'll take my facts from a right wing journalist over peer reviewed current scientific journals.
DJtearegashes a fact seeker and you are selectively ignoring data you don't like or that doesn't fit your narrative about gender being a social construct...
these people are mentally ill and only when its gender do we let them run wild and chop their genitals off
why do you think suicide rates are so high for these people? look at the data for post-op suicides
DJtearegaswhy do you think suicide rates are so high for these people? look at the data for post-op suicides
