Thought on meninism?
I'm a proud meninist
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
gnar_whalStill get mad pussy tho
gnar_whalStill get mad pussy tho
LonelyThis was already a thread. Go fuck a pillow
FrenchFryMeninism is for dudes who are intimidated by woman and cannot handle a woman that is stronger than they are or equal to them.
gnar_whalnah its really just for guys who hate them feminist trash
Brule.Can someone please explain the feminist/meninist feud for me? I'm confused by all of this.
vincent.feminism...http://redalertpolitics.com/2015/10/01/feminist-believes-finding-water-mars-sexist/
WillowsI most modern countries you will actually find that men don't have the same opportunities compared to women.. The danish HPV-vaccine is a great example.. Girls get it for free, boys have to pay for it.
Bill.NyeMen don't their abortions covered by national insurance in Denmark either.
ZOMG FEMINAZIS!
turdbuffetthe meninist of all meninists
https://youtu.be/T0xoKiH8JJM
turdbuffetthe meninist of all meninists
https://youtu.be/T0xoKiH8JJM
WillowsHow about Humanism? or equalism.. The basic thought behind feminism is great, but modern feminists have construed the role of feminism.. I most modern countries you will actually find that men don't have the same opportunities compared to women.. The danish HPV-vaccine is a great example.. Girls get it for free, boys have to pay for it.. A vaccine that prevents all kinds of cancers (testicular cancer among others).. I believe that girls in the Great Britain receive economic support for choosing to study as an engineer just because of the fact that there are more men in that field.. I think we have to remember that we don't need more women engineers we just need more engineers.. We are equal and therefore we should not support one sex more than we do the other...
WillowsI get that this is supposed to ridicule me, but that shit made no sense...
turdbuffetthe meninist of all meninists
https://youtu.be/T0xoKiH8JJM
Bill.NyeMen who get HPV usually don't develop any symptoms, hence the increased need to immunize women against it dipshit.
CheddarJackSecond, feminism does not push for 100% equality between the genders, as many people think it does. It is instead about equity. Men and women deserve different treatment in many cases. An obvious case is in medicine: If men and women had to pay for their prostate exams but got free abortions, that would be equality. But men can't get abortions and women don't have prostates so that wouldn't make any sense, would it? Equity would mean each gender gets financial assistance with their gender specific medicinal needs.
About your engineers example in Great Britain... It is actually because we need more women engineers. And we need more women more than we just need more engineers. GIrls are turned away from math and science degrees due to a cultural stigma against girls in that field and for being smart. GB has recognized that discrimination and enacted that to help fight that discrimination. Men are already pushed towards math and science so they don't need that assistance. This is equity.
Bill.NyeMen who get HPV usually don't develop any symptoms, hence the increased need to immunize women against it dipshit.
CheddarJackAlthough you're on the right track, your views are pretty skewed. First, feminism isn't a big deal. You don't have to be a radical lesbian activist to be a "modern feminist." I consider myself a feminist and I'm a straight white male and nobody's ever told me that I'm a feminist with a negative connotation - that is, I'm not in anyone's face about it. That being said, I'll take an opportunity like this one to spread my knowledge.
Second, feminism does not push for 100% equality between the genders, as many people think it does. It is instead about equity. Men and women deserve different treatment in many cases. An obvious case is in medicine: If men and women had to pay for their prostate exams but got free abortions, that would be equality. But men can't get abortions and women don't have prostates so that wouldn't make any sense, would it? Equity would mean each gender gets financial assistance with their gender specific medicinal needs.
About your engineers example in Great Britain... It is actually because we need more women engineers. And we need more women more than we just need more engineers. GIrls are turned away from math and science degrees due to a cultural stigma against girls in that field and for being smart. GB has recognized that discrimination and enacted that to help fight that discrimination. Men are already pushed towards math and science so they don't need that assistance. This is equity.
Things like that happen all the time for women and minorities... cough Affirmative Action cough.
So when you say "We are equal and therefore we should not support one sex more than we do the other", you have to ask yourself, who are we actually favoring? Because last time I checked, women are terribly oppressed in America and could use a helping hand.
onenerdykidWe will always need more engineers (and the like) but I don't know if we specifically need more women engineers. Don't we want the best engineers to rise to the top, regardless of their gender?
WillowsI agree on most of all this. I'm in support of equity, but my example with the HPV vaccine is not an example of equity. The HPV is equally beneficial for both sexes and therefore it should be free for both sexes or equally priced.
CheddarJackAlthough you're on the right track, your views are pretty skewed. First, feminism isn't a big deal. You don't have to be a radical lesbian activist to be a "modern feminist." I consider myself a feminist and I'm a straight white male and nobody's ever told me that I'm a feminist with a negative connotation - that is, I'm not in anyone's face about it. That being said, I'll take an opportunity like this one to spread my knowledge.
Second, feminism does not push for 100% equality between the genders, as many people think it does. It is instead about equity. Men and women deserve different treatment in many cases. An obvious case is in medicine: If men and women had to pay for their prostate exams but got free abortions, that would be equality. But men can't get abortions and women don't have prostates so that wouldn't make any sense, would it? Equity would mean each gender gets financial assistance with their gender specific medicinal needs.
About your engineers example in Great Britain... It is actually because we need more women engineers. And we need more women more than we just need more engineers. GIrls are turned away from math and science degrees due to a cultural stigma against girls in that field and for being smart. GB has recognized that discrimination and enacted that to help fight that discrimination. Men are already pushed towards math and science so they don't need that assistance. This is equity.
Things like that happen all the time for women and minorities... cough Affirmative Action cough.
So when you say "We are equal and therefore we should not support one sex more than we do the other", you have to ask yourself, who are we actually favoring? Because last time I checked, women are terribly oppressed in America and could use a helping hand.
cool_nameMenism isn't against, for most people, actual feminism though. It is against that bullshit radical feminism, the one where unless you are women you can't have opinions because of your "privilege"
and come on, women in North America are terribly oppressed, like I'm sure there is still some cases of oppression against women in America, there are some cases against men do, but they are in no ways terribly oppressed
CheddarJackI don't think anyone but radical feminists are in favor of them. You don't need to make up a dumb name for yourself that will just piss off a lot of people.
You have some learning to do if you don't think women are oppressed.. If they weren't, there wouldn't be any need for any sort of feminism. I use "terribly" as a comparative term. Compared to men (who aren't oppressed) and to what far too many people think, they are terribly oppressed. But yes, there are plenty of other groups that are far worse off.
CheddarJackVirtually all cases of cervical cancer are caused by HPV. Providing free HPV vaccines for women would theoretically prevent every cervical cancer case.
In the United States, high-risk HPV types cause approximately 3 percent of all cancer cases among women and 2 percent of all cancer cases among men.
Read more here: http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/infectious-agents/hpv-fact-sheet
So no, they're not equally beneficial. And and btw by saying that you agree with most of what I said makes you a feminist. See, it's not all that bad!
Also, this took my 2 minutes to find. Oh, but my parents aren't doctors so I'm wrong, right?