Here is the latest from Mt. Bachelor. Lets hope we will still have terrain parks with jumps!
Here is a link to the video story.
http://www.ktvz.com/news/changes-to-mt-bachelor-season-passes/35274018
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
DominatorJacquesLets hope we will still have terrain parks with jumps!
MinggI wouldn't worry about it too much. The video didn't say anything about changing the parks but rather the pass disclaimer/agreement - or at least that's what it appeared to be. We adjust ours between every 2-3 years or so as we see fit. You'll keep your park. If anything I would say they would implement some type of park pass before they ever got rid of stuff!
JuliusJDid you watch the video...? Was barely anything to do with the current park lawsuit.
Regardless of the current lawsuit's outcome, I would guess Bachelor just becomes like many other mountains that require a "park pass" to go in the terrain park. Makes sense for almost everyone involved, the mountain covers their ass and park skiers don't have to deal with the jerry's that roll though and stop in the landings or hit jumps they shouldn't be hitting.
DominatorJacquesI agree. But the enforcement of that would add to cost and Powder Corp. is very tight with spending at Bachelor!
JuliusJI'd imagine they'll work out whether or not the cost of doing so would be higher than that of future lawsuits. Don't jump to conclusions
Your right about that! Cost a lot more when they have to pay! You Smart!
Here is a link to a video (that BTW I'm as an extra) Looks at corporate greed. Just for fun you might find it entertains!
Bachelor is still good, just since other private local corp. sold to Powder it hasn't been the same.
https://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/782427/The-Executive
PoLaRpEaKThere are places in the world you can go in a terrain park without a park pass?
OregonDeadI don't think anyplace in Oregon requires a separate 'park pass' . Mother nature actually makes more dangerous terrain features within the ski area so IMO the whole idea of a 'park pass' makes no sense.
OregonDeadI don't think anyplace in Oregon requires a separate 'park pass' . Mother nature actually makes more dangerous terrain features within the ski area so IMO the whole idea of a 'park pass' makes no sense.
PoLaRpEaKThe thing is, you can't sue mother nature for creating something.
DominatorJacquesYea, maybe it's time for park passes for entry so one understands the "rules' and the risk are their own. This sort of thing has been talked about before.
i don't work there, I just ski there. Take care Mingg
TOAST.I believe I was told that park passes actually increase liability since you are kind of confirming that the person is qualified to be in the park. I could be completely wrong though.
JuliusJAgreed, tree wells and gas vents could definitely make for sketchy conditions sometimes. It doesn't, but covers the liability of resorts a bit more.
Could be an Onion article, "Mother nature stands trial for the natural disasters she has caused"