Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
ggfski42I bought BG Tour's 2 years ago and they are hands down the my favorite pow specific skis i've ever owned. They aren't described as strictly a charger, but they can haul some serious ass. Ive never toured on them, but they never struck me as heavy. They are deff. more of a directional ski, I mounted mine -8cm. If you can get a good deal on them, go for it for sure.
shin-bangdude -8? i felt like i was a mile back at -6
ggfski42Yeah I aactually mounted them at -6ish originally, but the tips were diving when I drove them really hard. Im a big dude, 6'2 215lbs, so I think I just needed more ski up front.
shin-bangOh I see man. Do you know what the recommended mounting point is?
cobra_commanderBest.SoftSnow.Charger.Ever.
seriously. Ability to Handel anything from deep light powder to mixed density sloppy seconds and old snow. It has the power and stability to rocket through just about anything and point it out of tight chutes, while still maintaining the ability to ski through trees at speed and turn on a dime.
it has, and will continue to be, my go to ski for soft snow.
rudagerWrote a review awhile ago, absolutely love the skis. Handles everything you throw at them.
https://www.newschoolers.com/reviews/3795/wMjktgruLc3KoyLy.97
Going junto my third year on this ski, most likely mounted with tech bindings
californiagrownI have the OG 2011/12 BillyGoatt 191's.
50Kal12/13 and after BG were all built with Reverse elliptical side cut(fancy rocker).
I was thinking about buying some close out 11/12 BG but was convinced by iggyskier to buy the 12/13 model. SO glad I did. It's main desire is to haul but I can handle trees well on the 12/13.
californiagrownthe 191's from that year had it.
they are totally different skis from the 186's from the same year.
californiagrownI have the OG 2011/12 BillyGoatt 191's.
HOWEVER they ski quite poorly in trees, and are just unwieldy at slow speeds. they are not playful, they are too heavy, stiff, and rear mounted to be poppy and jibby. these are not they skis for mellow days on the hill.
californiagrownthe 191's from that year had it.
they are totally different skis from the 186's from the same year.
division.bellI also had the 191's from 11/12 with RES and I disagree with you in regards to them skiing poorly in the trees, and not being playful or poppy. I personally thought those skis killed it everywhere, especially the trees. I had a lot of amazing days on those skis and most of those days were 1-2' fresh with 90% of those turns spent in tight fall line trees.
I still have 191 12/13 BG's and 186 13/14 BG Tours in my quiver because of how much I enjoy the BG's in the soft snow and especially their agility in the trees and tight stuff.
Different strokes I suppose.
division.bellI also had the 191's from 11/12 with RES and I disagree with you in regards to them skiing poorly in the trees, and not being playful or poppy. I personally thought those skis killed it everywhere, especially the trees. I had a lot of amazing days on those skis and most of those days were 1-2' fresh with 90% of those turns spent in tight fall line trees.
I still have 191 12/13 BG's and 186 13/14 BG Tours in my quiver because of how much I enjoy the BG's in the soft snow and especially their agility in the trees and tight stuff.
Different strokes I suppose.
californiagrownthe 191's from that year had it.
they are totally different skis from the 186's from the same year.
cobra_commanderIt was significantly refined in 12/13