TheDoughAbidesHaha I don't really picture the planet being humanly habitable by then but thats a different discussion. The Swedes would be scaling back their welfare system regardless of the immigrant population. Inhabitants born outside fo the country still only make up less than a fifth of the population. I agree, immigrants in Sweden are a net drain on the system, but they'd still have one of the oldest populations in the world with or without them.
Some questions for you. How do you feel about the amount of money us tax payers are spending to keep the president safe, or the fact that he's already up to six rounds of golf and lets members of the Mar a lago country club in on cabinet meetings?
It's not just those born outside Sweden, it's the offspring of those islamic migrants, of which there are many. They're collapsing the schools, are often more radical than their parents, and are also a huge net drain.
These warzone riots are not only the result of foreign born muslims, there are plenty who were born and grew up in these islamic ghettos.
So, when these populations eclipse that of actual Swedes, what happens to the country. When the country is at 25%, 33%, 50% muslim, what then? Muslims don't have the best track record when it comes to religious tolerance.
I'd honestly like to know how you picture a Sweden as these demographic shifts accelerate. What does Sweden look like when half of the country is muslim, and the younger demographics are primarily made up of the subsequent generations of muslim migrants?
Declines in population can be reversed, but population replacement cannot except through the most extreme means.
The expenses that go with keeping the president safe go with the territory, all presidents safety has been expensive to maintain. I never complained about the very expensive trips Obama took to Hawaii and Martha's Vineyard, because that's just how it goes. Trump at least is staying at his own resorts, not shutting down a whole section of the island as Obama would do at Martha's Vineyard.
Also worth mentioning that at least one of Trump's rounds of golf was with Prime Minister Abe of Japan, which seems fine to me. While I personally think that presidents should not take too much time for stuff like that, the hypocrisy of complaining about it given Obama's propensity towards golf is a bit laughable. In terms of conducting government business in front of guests, that is not something I condone.
I don't have to like or support everything the man does, but I'm also not going to feign outrage either.