It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
milk_manThe second graph shows that Muslims are substantially more likely to believe killing civilians is sometimes justified than any other ideological group
The first graph certainly does a better job of showing your point
"There is wider agreement that attacks on civilians by individuals or small groups are never justified. At least 7 in 10 American adults from all major religious groups agree that these attacks are never justified, but Muslim Americans again are most opposed, with 89% rejecting such attacks."
CampeadorI thought it was binary outcomes? You seem to have a strange fascination with this "binary" word. I haven't seen it this much since I was in an astronomy class.
Conquest through breeding and/or through violence, that's the muslim way. Binary.
Show me one place in Western Europe that proves otherwise.
Did you hear that in Great Britain subway has removed ham from the menu of 200 restaurants after requests from Muslims. Hahahaha
cornholiocan you post updated data that is not 6 years old?
That's a tu quoque fallacy. Instead of providing a counter argument you criticize my source. Six years isn't really that long either. But feel free to try to find a newer study which counters my claims of different religions and violence.If you've got a problem with the date of the reference, it's up to you not me to prove things have changed.
Looks like you're the only one here peddling conspiracy theories.
Wait I thought the NYT was a hack and couldn't be trusted? But since it suits your agenda it can be now? Wooo the mental gymnastics champion strikes again!!
note that investigation is A. Still on going and B. Mentioned no direct link, which does not mean there is nothing there. Sounds a lot like the FBI's recent comments about the Huma emails does it not? But I'm sure in your world there must be something there.
CampeadorConquest through breeding and/or through violence, that's the muslim way.
How is this different from the Christian way, my silly little cuckboy? Or did you fail high school history as well? Yikes.
Though, that does explain why you have so much time to sit around and post about how Donald Trump, the outsourcing king, is gonna get you workin in the ol factory again lololol
Anywho, I've come back to see how your little cuck mind deals with this whopper of a contradiction:
.MASSHOLE.Wait I thought the NYT was a hack and couldn't be trusted? But since it suits your agenda it can be now? Wooo the mental gymnastics champion strikes again!!
note that investigation is A. Still on going and B. Mentioned no direct link, which does not mean there is nothing there. Sounds a lot like the FBI's recent comments about the Huma emails does it not? But I'm sure in your world there must be something there.
Still trying so hard, its great to use your own sources against you. And for that matter, even the NYT can't lie all the time when they're forced to cover actual events (rather than give opinions).
The irony of complaining about Breitbart while posting opinion pieces from far-left sites like Slate, get your shit together man, you're pathetic.
TheDoughAbidesHow is this different from the Christian way, my silly little cuckboy? Or did you fail high school history as well? Yikes.
Though, that does explain why you have so much time to sit around and post about how Donald Trump, the outsourcing king, is gonna get you workin in the ol factory again lololol
Anywho, I've come back to see how your little cuck mind deals with this whopper of a contradiction:
CampeadorStill trying so hard, its great to use your own sources against you. And for that matter, even the NYT can't lie all the time when they're forced to cover actual events (rather than give opinions).
The irony of complaining about Breitbart while posting opinion pieces from far-left sites like Slate, get your shit together man, you're pathetic.
Because so many of those sources are opinion. Got it. The WaPo pieces about Trump scamming his contractors (did it again with his own internal pollster), not donating, saying lewd things about women, and lying about his ties to Russia are all opinionated right? Lol you are unbelievable. You're worse than any 50+ year old from Alabama on facebook with your belief about what does and what does not constitute accurate reporting.
See, when a website actually works (I.e Stephan Bannon) ON a campaign, using them as a source is about as credible as your nonexistent education.
CampeadorAre you even looking for a reply or do you just enjoy interjecting every once in a while with some pissy, irrelevant comment?
Be quiet and let the adults speak.
Calling yourself an adult hahahaha. I wouldn't go that far, you have the mental capacity of a teenager and the ability to reason like a child. I mean you are voting for a man child, his wife even referred to him as one.
CampeadorStill trying so hard, its great to use your own sources against you. And for that matter, even the NYT can't lie all the time when they're forced to cover actual events (rather than give opinions).
The irony of complaining about Breitbart while posting opinion pieces from far-left sites like Slate, get your shit together man, you're pathetic.
.MASSHOLE.Calling yourself an adult hahahaha. I wouldn't go that far, you have the mental capacity of a teenager and the ability to reason like a child. I mean you are voting for a man child, his wife even referred to him as one.
"In an interview with Trump biographer Michael D’Antonio, Ivana Trump recounted an incident from their courtship, a ski trip to Colorado. She had not told the real estate mogul she was an accomplished skier.
Trump skied down first.
“So he goes and stops, and he says, ‘Come on, baby. Come on, baby,’ “ Ivana Trump said. “I went up. I went two flips up in the air, two flips in front of him. I disappeared. Donald was so angry, he took off his skis, his ski boots, and walked up to the restaurant. ... He could not take it. He could not take it.”
She said he stormed off, muttering, “I’m not going to do this for anybody, including Ivana.”"
I don't know about you guys, but I'd be stoked if my girlfriend was doing flips on skis.
.MASSHOLE.Because so many of those sources are opinion. Got it. The WaPo pieces about Trump scamming his contractors (did it again with his own internal pollster), not donating, saying lewd things about women, and lying about his ties to Russia are all opinionated right? Lol you are unbelievable. You're worse than any 50+ year old from Alabama on facebook with your belief about what does and what does not constitute accurate reporting.
See, when a website actually works (I.e Stephan Bannon) ON a campaign, using them as a source is about as credible as your nonexistent education.
Kind of like the folks at CNN passing along questions to Hillary before debates, right?
Or how about other left-wing outlets getting questions approved by Podesta beforehand?
For someone who claims to be "unaffiliated", you sure do like Hillary.
And right, there are teenagers that understand taxes better than you do.
Didn't you say you're still claimed as a dependent? Sounds about right.
Hell, it doesn't get any more "dependent" than putting your folks half a million dollars in the hole. I'm glad you're proud of your expensive NE liberal indoctrination.
CampeadorFrom the guy who can't even keep his girlfriend from texting other guys on the side.
Creeping hard. I guess when you don't have a valid response for your hypocrisy you have to resort to these tactics. Want me to dig up some of your old posts? I've definitely seen some funny ones!
CampeadorKind of like the folks at CNN passing along questions to Hillary before debates, right?
Or how about other left-wing outlets getting questions approved by Podesta beforehand?
For someone who claims to be "unaffiliated", you sure do like Hillary.
And right, there are teenagers that understand taxes better than you do.
Didn't you say you're still claimed as a dependent? Sounds about right.
Hell, it doesn't get any more "dependent" than putting your folks half a million dollars in the hole. I'm glad you're proud of your expensive NE liberal indoctrination.
1. Never justified that as acceptable or defended it. But it is entirely different than having the editor/owner of a newspaper as your campaign manager. But nice try comparing the two.
2. Is that any different than a candidate being asked a question and not answering? Both candidates do not like answering questions and attempt to deflect things that are aimed at hurting their candidacy. Hillary with emails, Trump with his foundation, sexual assault accusations, shady payment history, etc. Reporters figuring out what are "acceptable" questions is not too surprising if they want something to report on. But obviously you knew that right? You just see this as more "corruption".
I don't like Hillary, I just see Trump as the idiot he is and would rather suffer through 4 years of her vs. him. Simple enough actually, I don't know why I keep having to repeat myself to you.
Sorry I don't really pay too much attention to my taxes beyond the basics, I guess that makes me a bad person for paying maybe a few hundred dollars more than I need. Who knew.
I am proud of it, it doesn't make me an idiotic, bigoted, right-wing moron like you.
CampeadorWho knew you could fit so many liberal beta males into one thread?
This is great.
Guys who call other guys "beta" or whatever are so obviously insecure with their own masculinity, and also out of realistic insults. It just makes you look more and more retarded. Kinda like "you're the puppet! You're the puppet!" That's how dumbass little kids talk to each other, eg Trump supporters.
CampeadorBecause you never had anything to say in the first place. As is always the case with social justice loons.
"My concern is that the negligence of a few will adversely affect the majority. I've long been a believer in the "look at the solution, not the problem" theory. In this case, the solution is clear. We will have to leave borders behind and go for global unity when it comes to financial stability." - The words of your idol, Donald J. Trump
YOUR CANDIDATE HAS ABSOLUTELY NO INTENTION OF FIGHTING GLOBALISM OR MAKING LIFE ANY BETTER FOR YOU UNLESS YOUR BANK ACCOUNT HAS 9 FIGURES.
But hey, it's 2016. Facts don't matter and everyone, even inbred embarrassments to the American identity, like Campeador, gets to be an expert.
Charlie_KellyCreeping hard. I guess when you don't have a valid response for your hypocrisy you have to resort to these tactics. Want me to dig up some of your old posts? I've definitely seen some funny ones!
Haha you can try my man, knock yourself out. Most of the time I was fucking around anyway, so it'll be funny to watch you fall into decade-old traps out of pure desperation.
I must've really struck a nerve, but it won't change the fact that your girlfriend is getting some action on the side.
TheDoughAbidesYOUR CANDIDATE HAS ABSOLUTELY NO INTENTION OF FIGHTING GLOBALISM OR MAKING LIFE ANY BETTER FOR YOU UNLESS YOUR BANK ACCOUNT HAS 9 FIGURES.
.
Caps-lock, eh? Someone's very serious!
As I've stated very succinctly before, if Trump keeps out the millions of muslims that Hillary would otherwise let in, that's more than enough for me.
Not everyone wants the country to start looking like Dearborn. Unless of course you're a weak, easily-triggered, liberal beta male (don't get too upset now).
As I've stated very succinctly before, if Trump keeps out the millions of muslims that Hillary would otherwise let in, that's more than enough for me.
Not everyone wants the country to start looking like Dearborn. Unless of course you're a weak, easily-triggered, liberal beta male (don't get too upset now).
#goodatmath. I guess 65,000 is the new million. Who knew?
.MASSHOLE.#goodatmath. I guess 65,000 is the new million. Who knew?
You're not as sharp as your wasted half a million in liberal indoctrination leads you to believe.
65,000 each year over four years just in Syrians, not to mention all the muslim "refugees" from places like Somalia.
Also includes all the hundreds of thousands of green cards that go to those in muslim countries each year. It's quite simple really, like not paying more than you owe in taxes. I know I've explained this before.
CampeadorYou're not as sharp as your wasted half a million in liberal indoctrination leads you to believe.
65,000 each year over four years just in Syrians, not to mention all the muslim "refugees" from places like Somalia.
Also includes all the hundreds of thousands of green cards that go to those in muslim countries each year. It's quite simple really, like not paying more than you owe in taxes. I know I've explained this before.
Still doesn't add up to millions. You do realize all refugees who come in are not necessarily Muslim right? Living in a Muslim country doesn't mean they're Islamic.
And what is wrong with actual greencard holders? They came legally, were vetted, had to take a nationalization test, and have to be shown they're not, as you love to call them, leaches.
Your bigotry is showing. I'm sure your ancestors were well received in this country.
As I've stated very succinctly before, if Trump keeps out the millions of muslims that Hillary would otherwise let in, that's more than enough for me.
Not everyone wants the country to start looking like Dearborn. Unless of course you're a weak, easily-triggered, liberal beta male (don't get too upset now).
"Trump is a racist! And a bigot! That's enough for me!"
I get it, he's the man you've been waiting for ever since Adolf blew his brains out in '45!
If what you are saying about your motives for voting is true, you are the weakest and most easily triggered person on this forum right now! You are the one who is so afraid of being killed by a terrorist that you are willing to put this country's future in the hands of a reality tv show host. Are you really such a wimp that you vote solely based on your fears? I doubt it. You're voting based on your prejudice! How intelligent of you!
Goodbye Campeador! I hope you find a way out of this cuckmaze you now struggle through!
.MASSHOLE.Still doesn't add up to millions. You do realize all refugees who come in are not necessarily Muslim right? Living in a Muslim country doesn't mean they're Islamic.
And what is wrong with actual greencard holders? They came legally, were vetted, had to take a nationalization test, and have to be shown they're not, as you love to call them, leaches.
Your bigotry is showing. I'm sure your ancestors were well received in this country.
That's interesting you posted a DHS report that you didn't even bother read.
Here's a graph that represents its data,
Over eight years, it is easily over a million. And with Hillary promising to bring in tens of thousands more "refugees" per year, she could easily get over that mark in only four years. Not to mention the chain migration set in motion by those already here bringing spouses, parents, and any other relative wanting to come over and live off our welfare system. Wasn't the Tsarnaev family on welfare?
You're right though, I'm sure most of those Pakistanis and Iraqis coming in are good Christians. You're the same naive fool that believed that a significant portion of the Syrian refugees coming in this year were Christians and Yazidis, when in fact, less than 1% of them are. I'm sure the same holds true for the rest of that migration.
If they're not leeches, care explaining why most of them are on welfare?
CampeadorThat's interesting you posted a DHS report that you didn't even bother read.
Here's a graph that represents its data,
Over eight years, it is easily over a million. And with Hillary promising to bring in tens of thousands more "refugees" per year, she could easily get over that mark in only four years. Not to mention the chain migration set in motion by those already here bringing spouses, parents, and any other relative wanting to come over and live off our welfare system. Wasn't the Tsarnaev family on welfare?
You're right though, I'm sure most of those Pakistanis and Iraqis coming in are good Christians. You're the same naive fool that believed that a significant portion of the Syrian refugees coming in this year were Christians and Yazidis, when in fact, less than 1% of them are. I'm sure the same holds true for the rest of that migration.
If they're not leeches, care explaining why most of them are on welfare?
Also, green card holders don't take a naturalization test to get a green card, that is for citizenship.
Notice that it says "Muslim Majority"? You know what kind of citizens leave Iran? Or Turkey? Usually non-Muslims. Same can be said for a lot of those other countries.
"Between 1992 and 2012, a total of about 1.7 million Muslims entered the U.S. as legal permanent residents. That constitutes a large portion of the overall U.S. Muslim population (estimated at 2.75 million as of 2011)."
You know how many we have now? 3.3, so you have an increase of 600,000 over 5 years.
Lol, yes, any family member is allowed to come over. Right. Glad you are now an immigration expert as well. That makes you a political, economic, immigration, and journalistic expert now right?
As are the majority of native families as well which indicates it is more of a systemic problem beyond immigrants does it not? Or does that not fit your narrative?
CampeadorHaha you can try my man, knock yourself out. Most of the time I was fucking around anyway, so it'll be funny to watch you fall into decade-old traps out of pure desperation.
I must've really struck a nerve, but it won't change the fact that your girlfriend is getting some action on the side.
I wasn't calling you a cabrón before for nothing.
Wouldn't be that hard man. But I appreciate you covering your tracks with the whole "I was just fucking around" clause. Must make the dumb shit you say a little more acceptable in your feeble mind. And you're still a hypocrite. But I've been on to your game for a while, and to be honest you've been playing it well. You're lucky there are so many new user that fall for your shit so easily. But that doesn't change the fact that you've been beat so many times in this thread you'd be better off as Chris Browns girlfriend.
Charlie_Kellyyou'd be better off as Chris Browns girlfriend.
I'd be careful talking about girlfriends, compadre.
Who knows which one of your girlfriend's "guy friends" is "roughing her up" lately, if you catch my drift.
How does it feel to be so inadequate, so pathetic, that your own girlfriend has to seek emotional validation from other guys on the side? (And let's face it, other things as well)
CampeadorI'd be careful talking about girlfriends, compadre.
Who knows which one of your girlfriend's "guy friends" is "roughing her up" lately, if you catch my drift.
How does it feel to be so inadequate, so pathetic, that your own girlfriend has to seek emotional validation from other guys on the side? (And let's face it, other things as well)
You're lucky she doesn't have my number.
Is someone butthurt they were called something they actually are? Did I upset you? You sure seem like it. It's okay sweetheart, you just keep stumbling your way through life with that precious CC degree.
TheDoughAbides"Trump is a racist! And a bigot! That's enough for me!"
I get it, he's the man you've been waiting for ever since Adolf blew his brains out in '45!
If what you are saying about your motives for voting is true, you are the weakest and most easily triggered person on this forum right now! You are the one who is so afraid of being killed by a terrorist that you are willing to put this country's future in the hands of a reality tv show host. Are you really such a wimp that you vote solely based on your fears? I doubt it. You're voting based on your prejudice! How intelligent of you!
Goodbye Campeador! I hope you find a way out of this cuckmaze you now struggle through!
I hurt your poor feelings so gravely that you even felt the need to leave feedback in my profile.
