CARTMANBRUHIowa is 47th with 8% population 19-25
Iowa is 5th with 13% 26-34
Iowa is 2nd with 11% 35-44
http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/distribution-by-age/
What are you talking about?
Do you know what truthiness is? You are guilty of it bro.
You didn't clarify if 5th and 2nd highest or lowest. But I will guess you mean 5th highest for 26-34, and 2nd lowest for 35-44. BUT let us do some math.
CBSNews reported the following:
Sanders had 86% of 17-24 year old voters (10% of all voters), while Clinton had 11%
Sanders had 81% of 25-29 year old voters (8% of all voters), Clinton had 17%
Sanders had 62% of 30-39 year old voters (14% of all voters), Clinton had 34%
Clinton had 51% of 40-49 year old voters (10% of all voters), Sanders had 44%
Clinton had 58% of 50-64 year old voters (30% of all voters), Sanders had 34%
Clinton had 69% of all voters 65 or older (28% of all voters), Sanders had 26%
WSJ reported this:
Sanders had 84% of voters aged 17-29, Clinton had 14%
Sanders had 58% of Voters aged 30-44, Clinton had 37%
Clinton had 58% of voters aged 45-64, Sanders had 35%
Clinton had 69% of voters older than 65, Sanders had 26%.
According to data collected by Goldford for the Iowa Caucus Project in 2008, 17-19 year-olds made up just 11 percent of Republican caucus participants, while that same demographic made up 22 percent of Democratic caucus participants. 22% is almost 1/4 is it not? Large voting population right there, especially considering he was estimated to have captured over 80% of it.
Take a look at this WSJ Graphic, it will prove my point.
http://graphics.wsj.com/elections/2016/iowa-caucuses-demographics/
Or this 538 Piece:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/bernie-sanders-could-win-iowa-and-new-hampshire-then-lose-everywhere-else/
Truthiness, the term from Stephen Colbert's show? Yes, I do know what it means.
And well, I mean, I don't think you have proven any figures of mine wrong so I don't think you are choosing the appropriate term here. I think "correct' is the viable choice.
Read what I have provided, then provide actual rebuttals