The referenced post has been removed.
But does it? Don't the rich get richer and the poor get poorer? Isn't the majority of population growth in the lower income brackets?
I see what you're saying about socialism, though I think "always" is a questionable adjective here. However, pure capitalism has a similar problem - in this case, however, it is not just the government who is greedy but BOTH the government and the rich. They get into bed together and the poor stay poor and grow in numbers. Who looks out for them?
I think what our forefathers did was truly brilliant. They imagined and implemented a system where (ideally) if the people called for the government to be more socialist, they could vote that. Ten years later, the people could change their mind and swing the other way. We have a unique balance that is being skewed by money in politics. That's my biggest gripe with our current "capitalist" mindset. Why do big companies get to influence the government? The people who work for them should get to vote, and that should be the extent of their say; they shouldn't be allowed to pour billions of dollars into politicians' pockets to buy votes. That would make our forefathers sick.