Importance of Image Stabilization

SourSteezleGotta go shoot a wedding. C100 w/ 17-55 2.8 IS + 7D mk II w/ Sigma 18-35 1.8 and Canon 70-200 2.8 IS ii = SEX

Cute toys.

Laurent.Cute toys.

Ha! Why would you waste money on that angenieux non-IS? Guess you haven't learned a thing from this discussion!

;)

eheathAlso, this is why no one likes you.

lol you sound miserable man.

eheathAlso this is hilarious you compared soursteelze to 4bi9... i thought soursteezle was just your name lol

kind of like how your old name was pussyfooter but you never get any pussy. OHHH BURNNN

Also, soursteezle's a religion

SourSteezlekind of like how your old name was pussyfooter but you never get any pussy. OHHH BURNNN

Also, soursteezle's a religion

I'm not really sure how that was supposed to be funny? Please explain.

SourSteezleI'm prob. one of the easiest people to get along with

On a different note... IS can help with rolling shutter issues (according to Philip bloom)

lIllI

Jon Snow for king 2k15

Just chiming in here on IS. I have used it quite a bit. I actually have had great experiences with it. I don't use it any more as i have moved to all manual lenses.

When i did use it i found it helped a ton. But as spoken watch out for distortion it can cause some nasty issues.

As for using it on a glidecam.... i found it to help alot. I used the canon 24-105 for a majority of my glidcam work. When shooting at higher mm around 70 or above it helps a ton. I was able to get smoth glides at 105 for long style jump shots. For me this was huge because i was able to get tripod style shots without having to jump over to the sticks. This allows me to get a wide variety of angles without changing the set up.

I used is on the glide cam for majority of this edit. https://vimeo.com/114842278

But for the 16-35mm i dont think it would be needed. You will be better of saving the money.

Hope this helps

j-calI used is on the glide cam for majority of this edit. https://vimeo.com/114842278

But for the 16-35mm i dont think it would be needed. You will be better of saving the money.

Thanks for the help! Just throwing it out there, the edit you linked here is undoubtedly my favorite ski edit to date. Cheers!

j-calJust chiming in here on IS. I have used it quite a bit. I actually have had great experiences with it. I don't use it any more as i have moved to all manual lenses.

When i did use it i found it helped a ton. But as spoken watch out for distortion it can cause some nasty issues.

As for using it on a glidecam.... i found it to help alot. I used the canon 24-105 for a majority of my glidcam work. When shooting at higher mm around 70 or above it helps a ton. I was able to get smoth glides at 105 for long style jump shots. For me this was huge because i was able to get tripod style shots without having to jump over to the sticks. This allows me to get a wide variety of angles without changing the set up.

I used is on the glide cam for majority of this edit. https://vimeo.com/114842278

But for the 16-35mm i dont think it would be needed. You will be better of saving the money.

Hope this helps

Someone actually agrees with me, there's still hope here