A quick word on blocking ads
It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
rballs_You're comparing a $1,300 camera with a $600 camera.
rballs_You're comparing a $1,300 camera with a $600 camera.
rainydayinspiredbut the a7s is gonna kick the d4s's ass every time in the lowlight and video department.
Laurent.Why are you comparing a camera aimed at video and low-light to a bulky allround monster of a professional camera with a AF systems that makes Sony cry and of which most users will never even use the video mode?
Laurent.Why are you comparing a camera aimed at video and low-light to a bulky allround monster of a professional camera with a AF systems that makes Sony cry and of which most users will never even use the video mode?
rainydayinspiredThe fact that you are asking this question proves that you missed the entire point.
lcoopmanA7 man. Make the move and get one you've been talking about it for a while. You won't regret it.
Laurent.No because it's a comparison that makes no sense, you might as wel compare an Alexa to the A7s and boost about the formers dynamic range.
Different tools for different jobs.
rainydayinspiredAaaand you still missed the point, I am quite aware of the intended uses for the D4s and the a7s, which is exactly why I made the comparison. Because it's the same as comparing the a7 to the a6000. You can't compare the a6000 to the a7 on price along because they are very different cameras with two different intended uses.......like the a7s and the d4s......
nutz.you have a terrible way of driving your point accross ahahaha
JapaneezyAnd the fact that sony produces D4's sensor
