Messages from Graves* (a conservative):
Date Sent: January 5 2005 17:19:20
You obviously need to read better. No where did it say that Kerry's tour of duty was not courageous. All it said that it was hypocritical to slander the war and then use it 30 years later as the main talking point for his campaign. Perhaps you should read some of the testimonies from POWs who were forced to read Kerry's Congressional statements by Viet Cong while they were being held captive. Maybe you will understand better how they felt when their eyes welled up with tears as they were forced to read a fellow soldiers comments that slandered their name. Maybe you will understand the torture they suffered. John Kerry's duty is honorable, what he did afterwards is not. His duty, despite being honorable, is pale in comparison to the torture his fellow soldiers went through in the heinous camps of the Viet Cong. Today John Kerry's picture hangs on the wall of the Communist Museum in Ho Chi Minh city. His testimony against the United States army is widely believed to extend the cause and add fuel to the Viet Cong's fire. Learn how to read and interpret a little better next time. Again, I will repeat that the article never criticized Kerry's duty, it criticized his post action. But what should I expect from a Liberal. You always think we are attacking his service.
NS has become the official gathering of the world's dumbest people.
Scratch174, thank you.