pretty hyped on this vid i just watched. unseen edit of wally
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bEr_d29fNU
dope.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
pussyfooterPlease take this off of your youtube account.
taj.damn that was tight, what did you film that on?
Roan.nobody cares if you are hyped or not because you're a little dbag. fuck off and delete this shit.
JakeSalvador:/ why are you so mad dude. it's a sick edit! go ski! have fun! lol
PUFFYWhats the big problem with this kid reposting this? Its a year maybe even 2 year old video, he should probably give the filmer etc. credit, but is it really that big a deal?
nutz.hmmm... let's say you make a product. Two years later everyone can steal it/walk out of stores with it for free because it's two years older?
No. fuck that lol. Get some better logic, reposting videos under another's channel for personal gain without paying or any reason really is a big fuck you to the people who make the videos and can lead to some pretty gnarly copyright lawsuits.
nutz.hmmm... let's say you make a product. Two years later everyone can steal it/walk out of stores with it for free because it's two years older?
No. fuck that lol. Get some better logic, reposting videos under another's channel for personal gain without paying or any reason really is a big fuck you to the people who make the videos and can lead to some pretty gnarly copyright lawsuits.
pussyfootergranted, the dude is probably 15 years old, I don't care that much, but I do want him to take it down.
pussyfooterThe point isn't money, its that this kid is trying to get traction on his youtube page with my videos, without my permission. He put me as credit but still, its lame as fuck when you put time into shooting and editing and people post it on their youtube page. Its just common sense, don't post someone else's videos.
granted, the dude is probably 15 years old, I don't care that much, but I do want him to take it down.
PUFFYI agree though I think reposting edits isn't as big a deal as NS makes it out to be, especially if the videos are old. The lamest part of this whole thing is the kid tried to pass it off as an "unseen" edit.
nutz.it's a huge deal. Someone takes something you worked hard on and tries to monetize in some way (gain viewership, make money, etc.) and doesn't ask you for permission or anything. There's a reason why patents and copyrights were created and a video is a product (intellectual property even) just like anything else out there. It's like that bullshit going on with ridersapp and stuff on instagram. if anything, your logic is severly flawed in that you don't think a video is worth anything past a WHOLE year, wow such a long time.
PUFFYFirst of all dude its a WHOLE 2 years old haha and if you read through my above post you'll see my point is that that video very likely won't make much more money in the future for Eheath etc. and that its likely more beneficial for the video to be spread for the sake of exposure/free advertising. Someone correct me if I'm wrong and tell me that that video stands to make Eheath/NS a lot of money and I'll shut up, but I highly doubt it. If this kid had reposted the video a day after Eheath had released this edit then I'd completely agree with you but its a old video that wasn't getting very many views.
Secondly, the whole permission thing I think is bullshit. So many edits on NS use music without artists permission and nobody bats an eye. I'm curious if Eheath reached out to Cormega and checked if it was alright to use his song for this edit or to Nas for his Karl edit. Anytime a filmer or skier uses a song in an edit, without permission they are "monetizing in some way" as you put it.
I get what you're saying but I think you're just being naive and not looking at this rationally. Intellectual property has been being violated on youtube for years now to the point that theres not much people can do about it.
nutz.fair point on the music, but this kid has contributed NOTHING to the edit, not the video nor the music. so what's he doing? just ripping off everyone
PUFFYI completely agree and think its especially fucking weak he tried to pass it off as "unseen" footage. Undoubtedly the right thing to do was to just link it to the original source on NS or Eheaths vimeo, but since its a somewhat old video I just don't think he's probably ripping anyone off that much. I'm also curious why Eheath/NS don't have much of a presence on youtube.
Blake.Peheath and ns probably dont have a youtube presence because who the hell uses youtube? very few people here go there to watch videos, and few people post them there. instead, most ski videos go to vimeo
also it shouldnt matter that its two years old, already seen, WHATEVER. the creator of the content, who owns the video (even if it is just intellectual property), asked the kid to remove it. the kid is benefiting from something he didnt do, and if eheath wants it down, the kid should pull it from his page. if he doesnt, all evan has to do is report it for copyright infringement on the video page, and youtube will pull it from the page
PUFFYFirst of all dude its a WHOLE 2 years old haha and if you read through my above post you'll see my point is that that video very likely won't make much more money in the future for Eheath etc. and that its likely more beneficial for the video to be spread for the sake of exposure/free advertising. Someone correct me if I'm wrong and tell me that that video stands to make Eheath/NS a lot of money and I'll shut up, but I highly doubt it. If this kid had reposted the video a day after Eheath had released this edit then I'd completely agree with you but its a old video that wasn't getting very many views.
Secondly, the whole permission thing I think is bullshit. So many edits on NS use music without artists permission and nobody bats an eye. I'm curious if Eheath reached out to Cormega and checked if it was alright to use his song for this edit or to Nas for his Karl edit. Anytime a filmer or skier uses a song in an edit, without permission they are "monetizing in some way" as you put it.
I get what you're saying but I think you're just being naive and not looking at this rationally. Intellectual property has been being violated on youtube for years now to the point that theres not much people can do about it.