Member of the Month

profa_212
July, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Non Symmetrical Skis?

profile picture
vichka.fonarev
Posts: 42 - Karma: 195
Hey guys, my current skis are getting pretty trashed, so I'm going to be in the market for new skis next season. I'm looking into the on3p filthy rich, and j skis whippit. The whippit is the cheaper of the two so I'm leaning towards that one, but here is the question. Will the whippits non symmetrical shape make any difference for landing and riding switch?
POLL
Edit Poll
Votes:

Take care when editing a poll; Options should be similar to maintain vote integrity.

More options will be added automatically as you type. You must supply a question and at least two options. No HTML is allowed.

10 years ago
6 0
profile picture
KravtZ
Posts: 6637 - Karma: 2,629
It won't make a huge difference unless you mount them super far back. Unless you ski park most of the day it won't be a big deal.
10 years ago
2 0
profile picture
whycantifindit
Posts: 53 - Karma: 498
Aight so I build skis. The purpose for skis being non-symmetrical is for stability. Symmetrical will be better for just about everything you can do in the park, but the whipit will do just fine. Since they don't have a ton of difference between the tip and tail, riding switch should be just as easy as with the on3ps. I would honestly get the J's if I were you. Nothing against on3p, it's just that J has the best reputation and best customer service. Jason's a super nice guy and everybody should support him. But yeah, it doesn't really matter that the whipits aren't symmetrical because they're pretty damn close.
10 years ago
0 0
profile picture
John18_6
Posts: 7313 - Karma: 49,171
K2 Shredditors and recoils aren't symmetrical and I absolutely love nuking down the hill switch on them.
10 years ago
2 0
profile picture
NMMedia
Posts: 982 - Karma: 1,700
I went from symmetrical (K2 Domain) to non symmetrical (Moment Vice). There is a difference for sure in the way they ski switch, anyone saying there isnt a difference hasnt swapped between the two, but it isnt a bad difference, or really a big difference. You will just notice it when youre carving switch, just landing switch or riding out switch without turning wont really feel any different at all
10 years ago
0 0
profile picture
SofaKingSick
Posts: 9839 - Karma: 66,592
you'll be fine. ive always thought symmetrical skis were over kill unless you are a very dedicated park rat and are literally switch half of the time you are skiing. otherwise i think the cons outweigh the pros. non symmetrical skis go switch FINE
10 years ago
1 0
profile picture
spaceghostpurp
Posts: 249 - Karma: 835
i have symmetrical skis and when i got them everybody told me they sucked for all mountain but honestly i dont feel a difference. In the park they are great but for all mountain it feels no different and everybody made such a big deal /rant. Probably not the best place to put this
10 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Flyingnugget
Posts: 487 - Karma: 221
I have Ar7s mounted 1.5cm back, which are non symmetrical and they carve tighter switch than they do regular. I want to try a symmetrical ski and see if they still carve nice when center mounted.
10 years ago
0 0
profile picture
shin-bang
Posts: 4106 - Karma: 7,039
TheWingmenI went from symmetrical (K2 Domain) to non symmetrical (Moment Vice). There is a difference for sure in the way they ski switch, anyone saying there isnt a difference hasnt swapped between the two, but it isnt a bad difference, or really a big difference. You will just notice it when youre carving switch, just landing switch or riding out switch without turning wont really feel any different at all


totally agree here. ive swapped back an forth also. you can tell when making turns switch and like he said carving. but, its not that huge of a deal
10 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Park.
Posts: 2480 - Karma: 4,587
Asymmetrical skis are better switch IMO. Symmetrical skis I have found are a bit unpredictable and slower edge to edge. Halfpipe skis are generally asymmetrical for a reason. They carve better with more control and they feel better landing switch IMO.

With symmetrical skis, unless they are fairly skinny like the punx, or are well designed like the walls, my personal experience tells me that symmetrical skis are more of a gimmick than anything. They simply don't care as well as asymmetrical skis switch.
10 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Burgy
Posts: 414 - Karma: 630
parkplaygroundAsymmetrical skis are better switch IMO. Symmetrical skis I have found are a bit unpredictable and slower edge to edge. Halfpipe skis are generally asymmetrical for a reason. They carve better with more control and they feel better landing switch IMO.

With symmetrical skis, unless they are fairly skinny like the punx, or are well designed like the walls, my personal experience tells me that symmetrical skis are more of a gimmick than anything. They simply don't care as well as asymmetrical skis switch.


this is very interesting, and I have thought about this myself, since the way you carve switch is very different from the way you carve skiing forwards.
10 years ago
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4); Currently it's 5:22AM