Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
SAiYAN.PRINCEThey'll be a solid ski for you. Durability won't be ON3P level or Jskis level but they are not flimsy by any means. And contrary to popular belief butters have very little to do with the ski and a lot to do with properly fitting boots.
Evan.AI had a pair of 2015 chronics for about a month of skiing before the sidewall blew out on me. Great ski but if you plan on hitting a lot of rails I wouldn't recommend it. Also if you are planning on using them for a few seasons that just won't be possible regardless of what you are doing on them. Line skis are "designed to be broken" the sales rep told me at mount snow when I showed him my sidewall and there isn't a way to get around that. If you are looking for good skis that are durable and flexible I would definitely buy J skis.
A_BurgerI know lots of people who have used chronics for multiple seasons of hitting rails.
also are you sure a rep would tell you that there skis are "designed to be broken"?
parkplaygroundit makes absolute sense. I don't doubt that at all because they have to make money, and they have reached a point where they can dial the durability of their skis so they get the best ratio of customer satisfaction:durability so the customer wants to purchase from the brand again. Many companies do this hence why you see edges that aren't all as thick as possible, thick bases, quality wood, etc from big names. I'm not saying that companies use bad materials, but they don't try accomodate (to the best of their abilities) to the skier that abuses their equipment like park skiers. From a business perspective, it is the most effective way of making money in this small market
A_BurgerI'm more confused as to why the rep would tell him that though. Its literally their job to sell the skis so saying they are crap isnt really helpful.