Do you believe there is a God?

jackdonovanIt can be interpreted different ways, idk why you're struggling with this concept so much, most of the bible is not literal but is metaphors and figurative language. You can interpret it the way you want

UtardSo I can interpret the bible any way I want? How can I be sure then that my interpretation matches the truth?

milk_manYou really know nothing about churches, do you?

KneeDropfaith, bruh.
god got ur back no matter what ur crazy is...

louie.miragsI know a lot about the Catholic church. I was forced to go until around the age of 14.

milk_manIf they wouldn't have forced you to go maybe you would still be going

louie.miragshmmmm maybe but not with what I know now

milk_manI'm at the point in life where my parents don't force me to go but I choose to

louie.miragsthat is sad dude



i'm kidding you do you.. I just don't know how you still could with all of the science out there? Could you do me a favor please? Listen to this podcast (it is entertaining I promise) and try to even wrap your head around it:

https://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/755248/Joe-Rogan-Experience--501---Randall-Carlson

roddy116there is not a single piece of scientific that proves or disproves god. like honestly how can you say your believe in science and then completely ignore that one fact. there is nothing in science that proves the the earth just kind of happened as compared to it being ushered in by a higher power, literally nothing, don't be stupid.

mirozSo what you're saying is that your faith trumps everyone's logic? Because it comes down to either a) observable and repeatable results, versus b) people's unsubstantiated claims.

Also, there is science that proves where the earth came from. They're called rocks and we can study them.

roddy116No I'm saying nothing disproves God. So if you want to take it personally than yes. And rocks fail to disprove the existence of God. Again don't be stupid.

roddy116No I'm saying nothing disproves God. So if you want to take it personally than yes. And rocks fail to disprove the existence of God. Again don't be stupid.

roddy116Calling to God isn't ignorance.

Honestly the way that non believing scientists like black science man is incredibly predgiduce towards believing scientists. And makes no sense whatsoever.

roddy116Calling to God isn't ignorance.

Honestly the way that non believing scientists like black science man is incredibly predgiduce towards believing scientists. And makes no sense whatsoever.

roddy116The way they act and treat*

To be fair I'm not saying all believing scientists are correct, because a lot of them aren't, but then again a lot of them hold the same findings as non believers.

zzzskizzzA lot of scientists aren't correct? That's probably one of the dumbest broadest statements I've ever heard. There's a lot of experiments and a lot of different kinds of science. You're seriously claiming your Bible is correct more than the scientific community is today?

Just because you can't disprove something doesn't mean it's real. Also let's not forget all the times the Bible has been disproven. Did you know Jewish people lived or were slaves in Egypt? Still no one in this thread has addressed that point.

roddy116look at the end of the day, you can't argue God with science, thats a true fact. if you want to argue God with science the only people that will end up looking stupid are the people that try to, because they have no idea what God, or the idea of God is.

roddy116look at the end of the day, you can't argue God with science, thats a true fact. if you want to argue God with science the only people that will end up looking stupid are the people that try to, because they have no idea what God, or the idea of God is.

roddy116and humans weren't created out of dirt. what is your point here? are you honestly going to let your entire self doubt and snottiness hang on a three page story in the bible? if so i feel bad to know that you have to be you at the end of the day.

zzzskizzzthe earth isn't flat the world wasn't made in 7 days. there is no recorded history of the Sun ever being blacked out for multiple days like the Bible says so. there's no evidence of a world flood. there's no evidence of anyone ever died and then was brought back to life walking on water or virgins giving birth. get the fuck out of here.

mirozI just tried to have a discussion with a troll. This must be a troll.

roddy116Or maybe your too caught up in one side of thinking. Open up your "enlightened" mind o great follower of bill nye the science guy.

zzzskizzzA lot of scientists aren't correct? That's probably one of the dumbest broadest statements I've ever heard. There's a lot of experiments and a lot of different kinds of science. You're seriously claiming your Bible is correct more than the scientific community is today?

Just because you can't disprove something doesn't mean it's real. Also let's not forget all the times the Bible has been disproven. Did you know Jewish people lived or were slaves in Egypt? Still no one in this thread has addressed that point.

.Hugo.I believe in scientology

milk_manThat's not what he was saying. He said that not all Bible believing scientists are correct.


But you seem to discredit ALL Bible believing scientists. How do you do that when they have the same credentials as non-believing scientists?

louie.miragsyou're a tool.

And not because you disagree with me or other people here. Your way of attempting to be right is odd and makes no sense.

milk_manThat's not what he was saying. He said that not all Bible believing scientists are correct.


But you seem to discredit ALL Bible believing scientists. How do you do that when they have the same credentials as non-believing scientists?

zzzskizzzglad to see after a page and a half you finally decide to respond to my posts. it is a fallacy trying to compare actual scientists to young earth creationists, because first off its not 50 50 there's an overwhelming amount of scientist that agree with me and then 2 percent agree with you. but my main point is this [video]http://youtu.be/5X5liH-hM80[\video] one runs off evidence where the other runs off one book. so which one do you think is more credible.

mirozWhen you say Bible-believing scientists, are you referring to scientists who believe in creationism? Or scientists who are also religious? Because with respect to the latter, there are definitely a lot of amazing scientists who are religious. But the former? ...ehhhhhhh not so much.

milk_manChristian scientists use the same scientific process as non-Christian scientists

milk_manChristian scientists use the same scientific process as non-Christian scientists

mirozWhen you say Bible-believing scientists, are you referring to scientists who believe in creationism? Or scientists who are also religious? Because with respect to the latter, there are definitely a lot of amazing scientists who are religious. But the former? ...ehhhhhhh not so much.

milk_manChristian scientists use the same scientific process as non-Christian scientists

Granite_StateSidenote/thought, but how come "the Church" preaches the word of the bible yet is one of the most corrupt organizations of the face of the planet?

louie.miragsHey milkman, did you get a chance to check out that podcast?

roddy116there is not a single piece of scientific that proves or disproves god. like honestly how can you say your believe in science and then completely ignore that one fact. there is nothing in science that proves the the earth just kind of happened as compared to it being ushered in by a higher power, literally nothing, don't be stupid.

roddy116No I'm saying nothing disproves God. So if you want to take it personally than yes. And rocks fail to disprove the existence of God. Again don't be stupid.

milk_manBits and pieces of information I have put together from tons of sources. That's why it makes no sense. I'm not just stealing someone else's words.

milk_manThe ones who believe that a higher power created life. As you call them, creationists. Yes

milk_manNot yet, I started it but then I realized it's 3 hours and I don't have that much time right now :/

mirozDo you have any names? Can you post any of their work here? Are any of them biologists? I'm legitimately curious.

zzzskizzzthey're part of one organization, I think they're called the IRC, or young earth creationist. (their only purpose is to try to disprove science and prove that the earth is 12,000 years old) and everything they've come out with to try to disprove our dating methods. has NOT been accepted by the scientific community and we've explained why, they just choose not to listen.

louie.miragsHey milkman, maybe you can help me with this question I have. Why do people thank God when good shit happens but don't really blame him when bad shit happens?

For example, I just saw somebody on FB that his daughter has gotten better since she has been diagnosed with Lupus. He went on to thank God and Jesus multiple times. Says thanks for the prayers and God was on his side blah blah blah. However, not one mention to God or Jesus giving the little girl Lupus. So, God isn't responsible for severe weather, cancer, dying, car accidents etc but he always gets credit for saving lives, curing cancer and people surviving car accidents. It is odd..

louie.miragsHey milkman, maybe you can help me with this question I have. Why do people thank God when good shit happens but don't really blame him when bad shit happens?

For example, I just saw somebody on FB that his daughter has gotten better since she has been diagnosed with Lupus. He went on to thank God and Jesus multiple times. Says thanks for the prayers and God was on his side blah blah blah. However, not one mention to God or Jesus giving the little girl Lupus. So, God isn't responsible for severe weather, cancer, dying, car accidents etc but he always gets credit for saving lives, curing cancer and people surviving car accidents. It is odd..