Member of the Month

partyandBS
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Gh3 or T5i

profile picture
liamrashotte
Posts: 246 - Karma: 738
looking to upgrade my camera...

What has better features and what would you consider the overall better camera for filming?
Jan 4 2015 3:08PM
36 5
profile picture
Spiri7o
Posts: 2163 - Karma: 1,100
Whats your price range?

The GH3 obviously has way more capability
Jan 4 2015 3:55PM
5 0
profile picture
WPoch
Posts: 1762 - Karma: 3,865
what camera or camera lenses did you have before?
Jan 4 2015 4:40PM
0 0
profile picture
nutz.
Posts: 3150 - Karma: 6,712
hmm you messaged me, but GH3 hands down haha...
Jan 4 2015 5:03PM
1 0
profile picture
liamrashotte
Posts: 246 - Karma: 738
WPochwhat camera or camera lenses did you have before?


I had a t3i and a canon ef s 55-250mm lens (and the stock lenses that came with the camera)

Also would the layout and everything be hard to get used too? If so would this be worth getting?
http://m.ebay.com/itm/221607419001?nav=WATCHING_ACTIVE
Jan 4 2015 5:16PM
0 0
profile picture
-AM-
Posts: 162 - Karma: 116
liamrashotteI had a t3i and a canon ef s 55-250mm lens (and the stock lenses that came with the camera)

Also would the layout and everything be hard to get used too? If so would this be worth getting?
http://m.ebay.com/itm/221607419001?nav=WATCHING_ACTIVE


I would steer clear of the packages on ebay like that. Chances are most of the stuff is cheap, and you'll be unhappy with what you get.

On another note, the T5i is a great camera just in terms of how easy it is to use (its also less than 500 right now on ebay). I just picked one up and couldn't be happier. The gh3 is a little more expensive (most people buy a speedbooster as well, which can add $100-$300 depending on what you get), but I've seen some amazing footage come out of it.
Jan 4 2015 8:57PM
2 0
profile picture
edai
Posts: 4992 - Karma: 4,693
1) Buy everything individually unless you've actually verified the integrity and quality of the package. I was able to buy a GH2 with an older 14-45mm Panasonic stock as opposed to the newer 14-42mm stock lens which is lower quality.

2) GH3. The T series is just gimmic after gimmic. With the GH3 you're getting a high quality and advanced DSLR for filming that is.
Jan 4 2015 11:31PM
2 0
profile picture
nutz.
Posts: 3150 - Karma: 6,712
-AM-I would steer clear of the packages on ebay like that. Chances are most of the stuff is cheap, and you'll be unhappy with what you get.

On another note, the T5i is a great camera just in terms of how easy it is to use (its also less than 500 right now on ebay). I just picked one up and couldn't be happier. The gh3 is a little more expensive (most people buy a speedbooster as well, which can add $100-$300 depending on what you get), but I've seen some amazing footage come out of it.


going from a t3i to a t5i isn't really an upgrade tbh.....What about the t3i is limiting you? just the 1080p 60fps?
Jan 4 2015 11:48PM
5 1
profile picture
plorr
Posts: 3131 - Karma: 528
Canon DSLRs are soo far behind when it comes to video. Even a GH2 would be a big upgrade from a t3i.


The t5i is a sham. literally identical to the t4i, and only an extremely marginal improvement over the t3i.
Jan 5 2015 2:07AM
3 1
profile picture
SKI.ING
Posts: 2695 - Karma: 2,536
plorrCanon DSLRs are soo far behind when it comes to video. Even a GH2 would be a big upgrade from a t3i.


The t5i is a sham. literally identical to the t4i, and only an extremely marginal improvement over the t3i.


You say they're behind but then only use the T series as an example of their product...
Jan 5 2015 1:21PM
0 2
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61710 - Karma: 124,286
SKI.INGYou say they're behind but then only use the T series as an example of their product...


Canon HDDSLRs are subpar compared to sony and panasonic. Even the 5dmk3 isn't that great.
Jan 5 2015 1:26PM
5 0
profile picture
lIllI
Posts: 1255 - Karma: 1,986
I like how the new GoPro is a nicer camera than the current Canon tXi.
Jan 5 2015 9:37PM
2 0
profile picture
plorr
Posts: 3131 - Karma: 528
SKI.INGYou say they're behind but then only use the T series as an example of their product...


Because the OP is discussing upgrading from a "T series" camera to another "T series" camera.

Do a little research. For every Canon DSLR, there are equivalently priced (or cheaper) cameras from Panasonic, Sony, or Blackmagic that will blow it out of the water in terms of video IQ and features. The 5Diii actually sucks for video considering how expensive it is. IMO even the C100/C300/C500 aren't really impressive at all. Buying a Canon DSLR for video isn't the best move unless you happen to be heavily invested in their glass, in which case you're still probably better off just adapting it to another system.

Who cares though. They are obviously still capable of producing good footage. Theres just a lot of other cameras out there that can produce better footage for the same/lower price.
Jan 6 2015 12:24AM
2 0
profile picture
liamrashotte
Posts: 246 - Karma: 738
My budget is around $1300 I was going to look at getting some new lenses as well what would you guys recommend?
Jan 6 2015 10:14AM
0 0
profile picture
JOYSTICK*
Posts: 271 - Karma: 1,932
when in doubt, snapsort.com

http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-Rebel-T5i-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-GH3
Jan 6 2015 1:48PM
0 0
profile picture
SKI.ING
Posts: 2695 - Karma: 2,536
plorrBecause the OP is discussing upgrading from a "T series" camera to another "T series" camera.

Do a little research. For every Canon DSLR, there are equivalently priced (or cheaper) cameras from Panasonic, Sony, or Blackmagic that will blow it out of the water in terms of video IQ and features. The 5Diii actually sucks for video considering how expensive it is. IMO even the C100/C300/C500 aren't really impressive at all. Buying a Canon DSLR for video isn't the best move unless you happen to be heavily invested in their glass, in which case you're still probably better off just adapting it to another system.

Who cares though. They are obviously still capable of producing good footage. Theres just a lot of other cameras out there that can produce better footage for the same/lower price.


Ok I understand that. I just don't think it's fair when people trash Canon over the T series. You're comparisons are valid though. I've just never had trouble with mine, but then again I haven't looked to upgrade my body in quite some time. I stand corrected. Took a look at the panasonic range.
Jan 6 2015 2:18PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61710 - Karma: 124,286
SKI.INGOk I understand that. I just don't think it's fair when people trash Canon over the T series. You're comparisons are valid though. I've just never had trouble with mine, but then again I haven't looked to upgrade my body in quite some time. I stand corrected. Took a look at the panasonic range.


The T series was great 6 years ago. It hasn't changed since then and everything else has changed.
Jan 6 2015 2:23PM
1 0
profile picture
plorr
Posts: 3131 - Karma: 528
SKI.INGOk I understand that. I just don't think it's fair when people trash Canon over the T series. You're comparisons are valid though. I've just never had trouble with mine, but then again I haven't looked to upgrade my body in quite some time. I stand corrected. Took a look at the panasonic range.


You're probably better off than most of NS that just drools over gear all the time. You can make good edits with a t3i.
Jan 6 2015 6:56PM
0 0
profile picture
gravel
Posts: 5523 - Karma: 42,371
plorrBuying a Canon DSLR for video isn't the best move unless you happen to be heavily invested in their glass, in which case you're still probably better off just adapting it to another system.


Adapting the glass is a sketchy choice because it'll likely soften your image and you won't get any AF if you shoot photos, which is a ridiculous drawback.

I had a T3i and didn't choose to switch over to a GH3 because I was heavily invested in glass and I shoot photos a lot, too. I was considering upgrading to either the GH3 or 4, but ended up going with the Canon 7D II because I needed something that would shoot 1080 60 but could also work as an excellent photography camera with which I didn't have to deal with swapping out my whole lens arsenal.
Jan 6 2015 8:01PM
1 0
profile picture
lIllI
Posts: 1255 - Karma: 1,986
gavinrudyAdapting the glass is a sketchy choice because it'll likely soften your image and you won't get any AF if you shoot photos, which is a ridiculous drawback.


The problem I have with a proprietary lens system like Canon is that they're anchored to their stagnating camera bodies. There are benefits to closed-end systems (Apple), but not when you can't even make a DSLR that shoots proper 1080p yet...
Jan 6 2015 9:17PM
1 0
profile picture
liamrashotte
Posts: 246 - Karma: 738
liamrashotteMy budget is around $1300 I was going to look at getting some new lenses as well what would you guys recommend?


.
Jan 6 2015 9:39PM
0 0
profile picture
lIllI
Posts: 1255 - Karma: 1,986
liamrashotte.


Gh2 + FD primes + tripod
Jan 6 2015 9:55PM
0 0
profile picture
liamrashotte
Posts: 246 - Karma: 738
lIllIGh2 + FD primes + tripod


i have Tripod, stabilizer, etc. Just looking for new lenses
Jan 6 2015 10:01PM
0 0
profile picture
lIllI
Posts: 1255 - Karma: 1,986
liamrashottei have Tripod, stabilizer, etc. Just looking for new lenses


Sachtler FSB8
Jan 6 2015 10:05PM
0 0
profile picture
blatt
Posts: 5584 - Karma: 3,097
Get a powershot. Sickest camera out.
Jan 7 2015 4:22AM
2 1
All times are Eastern (-5)