.RYAN66Torture is effective at getting information from a suspect. even the most highly trained resistance expert has his limits. As someone who has gone through resistance training and probably had all of that done to me minus the ass stuff which is just weird. it really is not that easy to break someone. they will more than likely give up on you unless it is someone like UBL who would have lots of information and be trained.
I'm sorry man, but that where you're wrong, you have a way too simplistic vision of the matter.
Just look it up, you'll find that all the studies made on the topic concluded that torture gives, at best, inconclusive intelligence, if not completely unreliable.
This is just a fact, not an opinion. A man will say anything to get out of torture, it does not mean he will give quality and reliable intelligence, and it fact, in most cases, he does not.
Add to this fact the number of innocent people tortured, and the fact that it goes against everything the US claim to stand for, and now weight in the pros and cons.
The US torturing people will help terrorist organization recruit, it will help them gain sympathy, and the US and their allies will loose credibility. More people will die because of this. And for what ? Non-reliable useless intelligence ?
You have some people coming to your country and claiming to be the good guys, to fight for human rights, freedom and everything. And in the back, they torture people including innocents, without any form of trial like it's 1352 ?
Well, I'm sorry, but they just fucked up, and I have yet to see a fact to prove me otherwise.