Member of the Month

hi_vis360
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Worse invention ever, what are they thinking.

profile picture
Filet-O-Fish
Posts: 866 - Karma: 4,038
Saw this on Mpora today and thought "what the fuck, this is the stupidest idea ever".

I can just imagine somebody landing on there shoulder blades and then it breaking and the snowboarder getting majorly fucked up. I get the point that they are trying to be able to do Quad corks, but with the help of this i feel like its really not a cool thing for the sport.

Link:
http://mpora.com/articles/snowboard-flying-suit

INB4:
this is not in Ski gabber, because its not skiing.
This is not in Snowboard gabber because its more about the technology then the snowboarding.
POLL
Edit Poll
Votes:

Take care when editing a poll; Options should be similar to maintain vote integrity.

More options will be added automatically as you type. You must supply a question and at least two options. No HTML is allowed.

Nov 13 2014 8:30AM
156 9
profile picture
270on420out
Posts: 7516 - Karma: 51,166
I don't mind if they do it, it actually sounds pretty cool. It should just be classified as a different sport.
Nov 13 2014 9:01AM
2 0
profile picture
cornholio
Posts: 3952 - Karma: 3,057
so if it gets you significantly more airtime, do you have to slow down going into the jumps so you don't overshoot? or will they build bigger ones only for people who have a jetpack?
Nov 13 2014 9:04AM
10 0
profile picture
JahLiam
Posts: 2321 - Karma: 7,828
worst*
Nov 13 2014 9:36AM
3 1
profile picture
baethoven
Posts: 4953 - Karma: 337
Oakley test researched this idea years ago ..

Nov 13 2014 9:59AM
49 0
profile picture
Caucasian_Asian
Posts: 2447 - Karma: 1,665
Wait until someones jacket flies away without them.
Nov 13 2014 10:26AM
4 0
profile picture
speedin
Posts: 731 - Karma: 131
I can't believe those designers were serous? A clothing designer trying to put turbine motors into a jacket, yea ok. In no way would something like that ever work. What is it powered by? Fuel? A battery pack? There is sooo much more to flight then the thrust.
I have to show this video to my buddy who is an engineer. He would get a great kick outa it.
Nov 13 2014 11:20AM
5 0
profile picture
Yaraelpoof.png
Posts: 1556 - Karma: 6,418
baethovenOakley test researched this idea years ago ..



So we know it works
Nov 13 2014 11:21AM
2 0
profile picture
SFB
Posts: 8895 - Karma: 26,354
sounds like a great way to fucking die
Nov 13 2014 11:48AM
10 0
profile picture
Krotchs_Brother
Posts: 1133 - Karma: 3,006
This is retarded. Why dont we just add springs onto the jumps and fuck it lets get the snowboarders in a jet plane for maximum air time.
Nov 13 2014 11:58AM
1 0
profile picture
byubound
Posts: 1636 - Karma: 9,870
I was hoping for some wingsuit jacket that would generate lift and not require you to carry a huge battery.
Nov 13 2014 12:05PM
2 0
profile picture
ZachAndCheese
Posts: 816 - Karma: 5,116
As long as they make it in triple xl I'll buy it
Nov 13 2014 12:20PM
16 1
profile picture
Hugh_Conway_jr
Posts: 746 - Karma: 467
Why is always Aussie's who come up with weird ideas?

How will it give you more "air time" if you do any kind of invert? wont it just push you back to ground faster?
Nov 13 2014 3:25PM
3 0
profile picture
StayGettinGuap
Posts: 8 - Karma: 22
your parents made the worst invention ever actually
























its you
Nov 13 2014 3:31PM
10 4
profile picture
danncphedran
Posts: 1622 - Karma: 1,002
baethovenOakley test researched this idea years ago ..



haha
Nov 13 2014 5:37PM
0 0
profile picture
DirtyDan
Posts: 1576 - Karma: 158
StayGettinGuapyour parents made the worst invention ever actually
























its you


#REKT
Nov 13 2014 5:42PM
0 0
profile picture
Abu_Hajaar
Posts: 2751 - Karma: 3,907
Better yet
Nov 13 2014 6:29PM
1 0
profile picture
Miomo
Posts: 4302 - Karma: 14,135
I don't think you know what "inb4" means
Nov 13 2014 7:16PM
0 0
profile picture
Filet-O-Fish
Posts: 866 - Karma: 4,038
MiomoI don't think you know what "inb4" means


I thought people would be hating about this being in the wrong section
Nov 13 2014 7:20PM
0 1
profile picture
Wampire
Posts: 1217 - Karma: 4,684
or you could just make bigger jumps
Nov 13 2014 7:46PM
3 0
profile picture
Wampire
Posts: 1217 - Karma: 4,684
And also that designer guy was a total flamer
Nov 13 2014 7:47PM
4 0
profile picture
op14
Posts: 1769 - Karma: 4,586
Tanner really could of used this...
Nov 13 2014 7:50PM
3 0
profile picture
soulskier
Posts: 17806 - Karma: 3,841
So if I was to wear a working version of this and go inverted, would it not send me plummeting to the ground?
Nov 13 2014 8:36PM
1 0
profile picture
Mr.noodle
Posts: 1361 - Karma: 4,655
Guys we need more air time for bigger tricks

We could build a bigger jump
We could make the jump have more pop
Make the snow board have more pop



How about we make a flying snow board jacket
Nov 13 2014 9:24PM
7 0
profile picture
Mr.Luke
Posts: 2441 - Karma: 166
He mentioned using the invention for training, which I think could be a pretty useful application for such a tool. Except for the fact that 1. It's an overly expensive technology that would probably break on impact from 40+ feet in the air to the ground, and 2. Snowboarders and skiers will eventually become reliant on such technology to preform.

This is taking the sport-aspect away from snowboarding/skiing. The idea behind this is taking away the physical application of muscle memory needed to preform a trick; Learn to hit bigger jump and excel and develop the sport. Don't ruin it with unnecessary technology.


It's the equivalent of a runner using rocket shoes to run faster. It's fucking stupid.

Day ruined. I'm pissed off. Fuck the world and fuck that snowboarder. Quads or go home pussy. Bitch is trying to cheat his way into the future.
Nov 14 2014 8:22AM
1 0
profile picture
Sneaky_Aziz
Posts: 691 - Karma: 230
Mr.LukeHe mentioned using the invention for training, which I think could be a pretty useful application for such a tool. Except for the fact that 1. It's an overly expensive technology that would probably break on impact from 40+ feet in the air to the ground, and 2. Snowboarders and skiers will eventually become reliant on such technology to preform.

This is taking the sport-aspect away from snowboarding/skiing. The idea behind this is taking away the physical application of muscle memory needed to preform a trick; Learn to hit bigger jump and excel and develop the sport. Don't ruin it with unnecessary technology.


It's the equivalent of a runner using rocket shoes to run faster. It's fucking stupid.

Day ruined. I'm pissed off. Fuck the world and fuck that snowboarder. Quads or go home pussy. Bitch is trying to cheat his way into the future.


Actually you're fucking wrong, this is sick. This is the future, we're gonna be able to ski on the fucking moon. On fucking mars.
Nov 14 2014 9:09AM
1 1
profile picture
Barefootin_Fiend
Posts: 7618 - Karma: 4,727
soulskierSo if I was to wear a working version of this and go inverted, would it not send me plummeting to the ground?


no. apparently there are gyroscopes built in that tell it when you become inverted, which in turn kills thrust so it does shoot you in to the ground.
Nov 14 2014 9:19AM
1 0
profile picture
pat_in_the_hat
Posts: 3019 - Karma: 2,695
its fake
Nov 14 2014 9:34AM
3 0
profile picture
I.Am.Lorde.
Posts: 1286 - Karma: 403
lol, trying to get a little bit more airtime... Bruh the jumps are only so big, good luck taking it to the flats. Also, they could just start higher up on the inrun....
Nov 14 2014 9:51AM
1 0
profile picture
Iliveinutah
Posts: 1250 - Karma: 5,147
ya would maybe be dope. yet wait until some one flat backs off a 80 footer with it on and see how dope it would be. The ignorance is so strong with this one.
Nov 14 2014 10:04AM
0 0
profile picture
RubberSoul
Posts: 11249 - Karma: 14,642
it's fake. nothing about it makes sense. oh, youre going to go bigger on the exact same jump? where do you plan to land? how do you think that little thing on your back (under your jacket?) is going to have enough thrust to affect your 100 something pound body?

retards!
Nov 14 2014 10:29AM
1 0
profile picture
[Steeze_Please]
Posts: 281 - Karma: 279
hahahaha this is just ridiculous and clearly made by somebody who has no idea what a park jump even is. Park jumps and jumps in slopestyle courses are specifically built to have you land on the sweet spot of the landing. Strap a jetpack on your backpack and all your going to be doing is landing flat and blowing out knees and ankles. You can only take a jump to the landing no matter how much air is possible. So ridiculously dumb.
Nov 14 2014 10:39AM
1 0
profile picture
I.Am.Lorde.
Posts: 1286 - Karma: 403
Also, what a waste of R&D
Nov 14 2014 12:03PM
0 0
profile picture
FreedGucci
Posts: 454 - Karma: 3,192
Definitely fake...
Nov 14 2014 1:28PM
0 0
profile picture
JAHpow
Posts: 7282 - Karma: 17,179
Yeah I don't think that invention is going to take off.




OOHHHHHHHH
Nov 14 2014 1:30PM
2 0
profile picture
RiccardoMasutti
Posts: 248 - Karma: 662
baethovenOakley test researched this idea years ago ..



Lol
Nov 14 2014 1:57PM
0 0
profile picture
Rusticles
Posts: 2180 - Karma: 1,337
baethovenOakley test researched this idea years ago ..



LOL's..................................but damn how is he still alive
Nov 14 2014 2:14PM
0 0
profile picture
SquattingDog
Posts: 196 - Karma: 393
There would have to be different jackets for snowboarders and skiers, you would have to be hitting the jump like Patrick fucking star to be able to go up, if you go in tucked it will shoot you far past the landing and not up.
Nov 14 2014 2:40PM
0 0
profile picture
Laurent.
Posts: 10056 - Karma: 25,313
RusticlesLOL's..................................but damn how is he still alive


Manlets are blessed by ant-like biomechanics making them stronger and allowing them to survive bigger drops.
Nov 14 2014 2:47PM
1 0
profile picture
yuck
Posts: 8384 - Karma: 2,090
pretty skeptical about this... i mean, if they could create a usable amount of thrust from a unit that small, stable and temperature-neutral, the world would be losing its shit over such handy dandy technology. the first uses of this technology would probably be military, not... snowboarding...
Nov 14 2014 4:45PM
0 0
profile picture
Kazabazua
Posts: 3529 - Karma: 1,128
After watching that I can honestly say I will never buy anything Oakley ever again - That may have been one of the worst ideas I've ever heard and I guarantee those designers have never set foot on a snowboard before.
Nov 14 2014 4:55PM
0 0
profile picture
notspoicey
Posts: 1167 - Karma: 1,706
Nov 14 2014 5:53PM
1 0
profile picture
O.Ps-Mom
Posts: 155 - Karma: 147
More ways to make snowboarding more stupid.. Now they have to do even less work
Nov 14 2014 6:00PM
0 0
profile picture
twin-tip-hero
Posts: 2896 - Karma: 277
Nov 14 2014 7:13PM
0 0
profile picture
bdarb207
Posts: 3057 - Karma: 438
INB4:
this is not in Ski gabber, because its not skiing.
This is not in Snowboard gabber because its more about the technology then the snowboarding.[/QUOTE]

Since when is there a snowboard gabber and why does it exist?
Nov 14 2014 8:02PM
0 0
profile picture
27sloan
Posts: 15 - Karma: 26
I would still be down to fly, even if it might break my back.
Nov 15 2014 12:40PM
0 0
profile picture
*DELETED*
Posts: 1043 - Karma: 938
Theyre going to have to start frisking riders at comps
Nov 15 2014 7:31PM
0 0
profile picture
gotti
Posts: 4269 - Karma: 4,550
this could be useful for urban...
Nov 15 2014 7:59PM
0 0
profile picture
Flacko
Posts: 1495 - Karma: 788
just a publicity stunt, like the amazon drones
Nov 15 2014 10:46PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)