Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

K2 shreditors 102 vs 112

profile picture
MACK.
Posts: 1230 - Karma: 1,892
Hey ns
Was hoping for some insight on which shreditor I should buy. I'll be using it as me everything ski. I need it to be able to rip hard groomers (I have a place in sun valley where it gets pretty firm) but I also need it to ski rip through 2+ feet of powder (I live near mt. Hood) I also need it to ski a little bit of park (but I do have a pure park ski that I will use for park days) I just want a fun playful all around ski. Also I'm 6'0 145 for size reference I'd be looking at the 179s
Thanks and always plus k for helpful answers
Nov 6 2014 1:06PM
1 0
profile picture
kalle.
Posts: 761 - Karma: 4,792
102 might be better for ripping groomer and park cause it's narrower and that makes it more nimble edge to egde. i'm pretty sure they'll be good in that 2feet pow too.
but then again 112 might be more fun for its wideness, at least in pow. and it would be really stable at the jib-jab on groomers like butters and manuals if you're into that.
here's a vs between the two to help you more (hopefully) than my write:
http://skis.findthebest.com/compare/2435-2436/2014-K2-Shreditor-102-vs-2014-K2-Shreditor-112
Nov 6 2014 1:36PM
0 0
profile picture
kalle.
Posts: 761 - Karma: 4,792
102 might be better for ripping groomer and park cause it's narrower and that makes it more nimble edge to egde. i'm pretty sure they'll be good in that 2feet pow too.
but then again 112 might be more fun for its wideness, at least in pow. and it would be really stable at the jib-jab on groomers like butters and manuals if you're into that.
here's a vs between the two to help you more (hopefully) than my write:
http://skis.findthebest.com/compare/2435-2436/2014-K2-Shreditor-102-vs-2014-K2-Shreditor-112
Nov 6 2014 1:36PM
0 0
profile picture
kalle.
Posts: 761 - Karma: 4,792
kalle.102 might be better for ripping groomer and park cause it's narrower and that makes it more nimble edge to egde. i'm pretty sure they'll be good in that 2feet pow too.
but then again 112 might be more fun for its wideness, at least in pow. and it would be really stable at the jib-jab on groomers like butters and manuals if you're into that.
here's a vs between the two to help you more (hopefully) than my write:
http://skis.findthebest.com/compare/2435-2436/2014-K2-Shreditor-102-vs-2014-K2-Shreditor-112


oops

thanks laggy connection
Nov 6 2014 1:37PM
0 0
profile picture
MACK.
Posts: 1230 - Karma: 1,892
kalle.oops

thanks laggy connection


Haha you're good
Yeah I think I'm leaning towards the 112s
Thanks man +k for sure
Nov 6 2014 1:44PM
0 0
profile picture
kalle.
Posts: 761 - Karma: 4,792
MACK.Haha you're good
Yeah I think I'm leaning towards the 112s
Thanks man +k for sure


haha +K back

have a good season bro!
Nov 6 2014 1:50PM
0 0
profile picture
BirtDike
Posts: 1258 - Karma: 514
Nice triple post kalle.

Are you looking at last years or this years? Do you ski more at mt. Hood than sun valley?

Id say go for the 112 since you already have a park ski. You could get away with the 102, especially if you ski a lot of bumps, but i think the 112 would be the best for mt hood.
Nov 6 2014 5:37PM
0 0
profile picture
MACK.
Posts: 1230 - Karma: 1,892
PentHausNice triple post kalle.

Are you looking at last years or this years? Do you ski more at mt. Hood than sun valley?

Id say go for the 112 since you already have a park ski. You could get away with the 102, especially if you ski a lot of bumps, but i think the 112 would be the best for mt hood.


I probably ski at hood about 25 days a year and sun valley 10 days
yeah i think ima get the 112s thanks man +k
Nov 7 2014 4:00PM
0 0
profile picture
Logan.
Posts: 717 - Karma: 1,862
Honestly 102 with is perfectly fine for skiing powder, obviously the 112 will be a little better though. It just depends on how good you want it to be for sun valley, the 102 will definitely be better on firm stuff, and also a little lighter and more agile in the park
Nov 7 2014 5:15PM
1 0
All times are Eastern (-5)