Just as title says. What are some advantages or disagvantages to each?
I'm looking at dragon goggles and I'm either gonna go nfx or apx and I don't know which one to go with?
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
Caucasian_AsianSpherical lenses are more rigid, and less likely to flew to fit a face.
I like cylindrical lenses because they fit my large flat face better. All spherical lenses leave me with a gap at the bridge of my nose.
.LincolnLess likely to flew to fit a face? I have a medium ish sized head as well if it matters.
Caucasian_Asian*flex or conform to your face.
Not everyone has a profile that fits spherical lenses. I personally don't notice a difference in quality or field of view between a Smith iOX and the Smith Stance. The Stance and old Fuse frame fit me wonderfully. I have several pairs of each, in different lens tints and always carry two pairs when I ski.
Spherical lenses are expensive because they're marketing them as the new hotness. I'm fine with that. I can get two pairs of Stamces for the same price of one iOX.
Wow.Sorry for double post but the NFX is butt ugly, the APX are still massive but much more stylish. Just my 2cents
.LincolnI like them both haha. Just don't know what to get, will probably get spherical tho. Good input man. K+
tomPietrowskiIf you can affor it go spherical they do make a difference for sure. I may suggest you take a look at the new Oakley prism lense. They are next level in terms of vision.
.LincolnNever been a fan of oakley goggles. Also they're probably out of my price range.
Rosa_ParkI have the NFX and love them. I actually dont like the look of spherical goggles
tomPietrowskiTake a look at the lenses though they may change your mind. The new Oakley frameless google looks pretty nice if you were lookin at the dragons.
.LincolnHow are they as far as price? Because I can get dragons for around $80 and wouldn't really want to spend more than $100