Alright, theres been a LOT of talk of this in the past, but i must know peoples opinions here. Why does everyone think Tanner Hall is the greatest skiier in the world?
Skiing is not limited to park only. Thats only half of skiing right there, maybe not even half. If you say skiing is nothing but park, then you are omitting props to people such as Seth Morrison and Hugo Harrison, who rarely, if much ever anymore, go the park. Just because some doesn't compete and go for everything doesn't make that person a bad skier. Look at Anthony Boronowski, one of the most (in my opinion) under-rated skiers in the world, who gets very litle props and attention simply because he shuns competition and park-only skiing. Those that don't compete are often forgotten.
It goes the other way too, though. Others of you say Seth Morrison is the best skier in the world. And he may be the best big mountain skier in the world, yes, but his park skills still aren't as developed as others. And I know there will be probably ten of you that say 'well what about his ________ (fill in with swtch rodeo 7, lincoln loop, etc) off of a cliff' and to that I say that is awesome, but when was the last time you saw Seth Morrison ripping it up at the US Freeskiing Open?
You cant call someone who a master of skiing until they've mastered all the aspects of skiing. Henrik Winstedt is a fine example of one who has conquered all. And Ill probably see fifteen or twenty replies about TJ Schiller, who is very rad, but still...he needs to show off the full extent of his skills before anyone can claim him to be the 'best'. And no, the Ultimate Bumps and Jumps does not determine the best skier in the world One competition can't do that.
So I am asking all of you NS'ers out there, why must you continue to think of Tanner Hall as the best skier in the world, when he obviously isn't?
Fry: I thought your job was to cast the tiebreaking vote in the senate.
Al Gore: That, AND protect the space time continuum! Read the constitution!