Bum.LifeCompanies aren't going to spend a shit load of money to make stuff that purposely looks bad so that people won't buy it. That makes no sense at all. This thread is balls
A golden rule of product development is that the top model (which is at the same time the most expensive) should look the best. That is the "vector model" and it's the image piece that should drive the brand. This is how the car, bike, boat, shoe, ski boot industry etc all operate.
However, this does not mean that a company should make the lower end products look shitty on purpose (after all they need to sell those too). It just means that the top should look the best. This is tricky thing to achieve because trying to purposefully make a lower end product look less attractive while not causing it to look bad is not an easy thing to do. Ultimately, whether or not a company actually achieves this is rather subjective but I can guarantee you that no brand is purposefully trying to make their low end product look
bad.