Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
Profahoben_212Why are you comparing them to the 98? Why not the 106?
The referenced post has been removed.
_J.T.well the kartel will feel more poppy, because it has camber.
TheDetectivesi really liked my bridges so i think id be fine
The referenced post has been removed.
LOLZfajitasi don't really like their shape, i've always been a even tip and tail height kinda guy
TheDetectivesmost all mtn skis are like that, even the symetrical candide 2.0 doesnt have the same amount of rocker in the tip and tail
VANULARFaction Soma
cobra_commanderso a edit of a guy sponsored by 4FRNT, made you think about buying 4FRNT skis?
rounds on target, 4frnt, well done.
lil_cote_93Are the devastators too heavy though?
ghosthopThought the devastators gripped just fine. +1 on all the comments saying they rip, the skis are aptly named. Its an all metal ski, would not be my first choice in the park, especially if I was going to session a rail all afternoon.
Profahoben_212Actually because their rocker is the exact same as the sidecut, the edge will contact the snow all the way up the ski when put on edge. Meaning the Devastators will actually grab the snow almost as well as a full camber ski, and why they are such a versatile ski.
Scotty_Boy4FRNT is so creative with their shapes, I've never heard of a ski like that before. Sounds dope.