Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
tomPietrowskiWho does? The tallest pro shell I have found was te Patagonia powder blower. Pretty nice coat but there just is not much else. Most other brands using gore stick to a traditional fit to keep costs down. Having a brand which made goretex pro in a freestyle fashion would be great.
tomPietrowski^this I would like to see. Saga have you ever looked into the cost of using goretex? Personally I woul be happy to pay say 500 for a longer goretex pro jacket. I love arcteryx pants the fit is amazing but the jackets are just not what I'm after fit wise. It would be great to have a new school brand offering outerwear which really could compete with the best brands out there.
Shifties4DayzArc'teryx does make a longer fitting "trench coat" style shell. I'm 6'4 and the XL fits similar to XL saga anomie jacket. It is abit more of a slim/tailored fit
tomPietrowskiWho does? The tallest pro shell I have found was te Patagonia powder blower. Pretty nice coat but there just is not much else. Most other brands using gore stick to a traditional fit to keep costs down. Having a brand which made goretex pro in a freestyle fashion would be great.
Huck_NorrisWell I don't know about "the tallest" nor do I want to cunt up a Saga thread with links to other company's products when we're trying to belittle OP for being a sheep here... But the Theta line of Arc jackets is I believe 6" longer cut? My Theta Ar goes to my upper-mid thigh and is all super bomber 3L ProShell. It's still not 3X Saga but it's longer for sure.
Also Norrona makes several longer cut jackets too I have one of their GoreTex onezies and it's fucking amazing. Narvik I believe is one of their longer shells, but there are others too. Bergans is baller and baggy as fuck too. Top notch materials, but again- you may actually have to wear something that *sort of fits* and I can't tell if that's what we're talking about or not here to be completely honest.
Isn't there also another company called NT3K33somethingorother that custom makes jackets out there? Maybe look them up.
Also Freeride Systems is all made in USA and I know Mike will make you anything you fucking want if you ask him.
So yeah... The point I'm trying to make is that people love to bitch and the solution to their problem likely exists- if they spent less time bitching and more time looking they would have found it by now. ;) OP was clearly a n00b who couldn't be bothered to look before he spoke, let's not all follow suit and shoot the messenger for saying "yes, longer goretex or similar jackets exist". Don't be mad at Sage for not being Bergans. If you want that, look around for fuck's sake guys.
Saga gonna Saga. If they stopped doing Saga and became Bergans or Norrona tomorrow you'd all be pissed and you know it. So... Cheers?
tomPietrowskiI love your responses huck because you actually know what you are talkin about.
I think I must just be an odd shape. The companies I work for has all those theta jackets and norrona but I just can't get them to fit right. For the last few years I have been wearing bonfire as I love the fit an some of the stuff has decent tech.
My point was more asking why saga don't want to get into the real tech stuff. As I said before using goretex is not really about the membrane it's about the other controls goretex set. For a jkt to have the goretex pro label it has to conform to some high standards. It's theses standards I and quite a fe other skiers look for. So although saga have good gear without having the gore name they are losing customers straight away.
Out of interet have you wet worn one of the nt3k jackets. I love te look but hate buying without having seen and tried an item on.
Huck_NorrisWell thank you, I appreciate your expertise as well. You are one of the few who really knows and cares.
What fit are you actually after and what jacket has given it to you so far if you don't mind my asking? I'd start there for sure.
I just wanted to say that nobody should get caught up in "GoreTex" per se. At all. I've used many jackets that are as good if not better and they are less expensive because it doesn't have the same name. There are SO MANY good options out there, if it is highly rated and it's by a reputable parent textile manufacturer it's going to work as stated for the most part. Yes some are slightly better than others at certain things but it's a sliding scale- no fabric is the best at everything and you know you have to pick and choose. Some breathe magnificently, some feel or repel water differently, some are different at wind blocking or passive insulation or are more durable on their face, etc. etc. etc. It all really depends on the individual's needs and wants.
Right now if you want full on tall tee steeze and just a shell, you are probably going to have to go with FD/Virtika or MAYBE Bergans... But again I'm not a big 3X steeze guy so I really can't help too much in that direction unfortunately and I'm not sure which is better for that look tbh.
Sorry for any spelling mistakes or missing R's... Spilled coffee in my keyboard yesterday and today it's a fucking Sugar Daddy inside. Ugh.
tomPietrowskiMy point was more asking why saga don't want to get into the real tech stuff.
Saga.Any products we make geared even slightly towards the more "tech" gear haven't sold as well as our other products. Its incredibly hard to justify jumping balls deep into a product line with nothing but a couple voices on the internet backing it. But of course, over time as things grow there could one day be room in our line for such an item as you are describing.
Keep in mind also when you say things like "a lot of people are asking for this". A lot of people will say "yeah that would be sick", or "I would definitely buy that". But when it comes down to it not very many of them usually do, regardless of the product.
tomPietrowskiI certainly see what you are saying but would you say you maybe don't sell much tech stuff because the customers who want that stuff are not considering you as an option. I don't know many serious skiers who would look at your stuff. The reasons being that you have the reputation of that ns brand so big, colourful and cheap but not something you would compare to the top brands.
Another factor is your limited distribution. It's one thing buying a 200 jacket online that you have never tried but it's a whole other world buying 500-750 jackets. When you spend that much you want to know what your getting. So maybe if you can have more distribution then maybe you can build th customer base who will actually spend decent money.
But I guess more then anything it comes down to if you want to do it. So far your doing well doing what your doing so maybe you don't want to expand into different markets. But if you don't I really think some companies needs too and personally I would like to see it be you guys.
Saga.The distribution thing is a tough issue. You can't really just say "hey shop that carries patagonia and northface, buy a bunch of these super tek shells that we just made first year and have no sales history to back them up." (Actually we can do that with some products, but not really in a field we don't have proven sales).
tomPietrowskiAnd it's this exact reason why gortex may be good for you guys. It will give shops some reassurance that the products they are buying can actually go up against the more established brands.
North face had a good basic gortex jkt this year that was cheap like 299 pounds. That sold so well this season. Maybe it's that type of product that could break you into the mainstream.
tomPietrowskiAnd it's this exact reason why gortex may be good for you guys. It will give shops some reassurance that the products they are buying can actually go up against the more established brands.
North face had a good basic gortex jkt this year that was cheap like 299 pounds. That sold so well this season. Maybe it's that type of product that could break you into the mainstream.
Huck_NorrisThe only reason TNF can offer a $299 shell is because they are an enormous company and can buy in extreme bulk. Many time textile mills offer special pricing and incentive just to get an account like that on the books and I highly doubt Saga would command the same consideration unfortunately. The economics of doing that are astronomical to keep it simple. That's also why Columbia can give you 3 jackets in a 3-in-1 and it still only costs ~
hippystinx34 inch zipper inch zipper
36 inch back
22 inch waist
20 inch chest
from neck down to wrist 33 inchs
-sonic welded seems, or friction welded what ever type of welding there is going on. I know patagonia, helly hansen, and a couple other company's were toying around with the idea but it never seemed to really catch on.
-two hand pockets on the front of the jacket and one chest pocket
-pit zips
-helmet capable hood
-3l pro shell(or comparable material)
-JUST A SHELL, no inside fleece layer, no mesh layer, nothing, just a shell. Maybe at the very most find some super super thin wicking material. however I think the removable of the inside lining layer changes the fabric to a 2l but I don't know the exacts of it.
I am skinny but that would be an athletic fitting shell for me at 6'3ish and 170-190 pounds, seems to be my weight fluctuation thru seasons
I wonder how accurate those dimensions are for other skinny tall people