Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Camera specific review categories
Posts: 11075
-
Karma: 82,508
Hey guys, we're hoping to add some new categories to the review section and need your help choosing what to add! Here is an example of what we're looking to add. The more info you can provide, the better!
Camera Stabilizer
Size Small Large
Load Light Heavy
Ease of use Easy Hard
Stabilization Non-existent Silky Smooth
Durability Cheap Durable
DSLR / Micro 4/3
Size Small Large
Handling Clunky Natural
Max Resolution Small High
Usable ISO Range Low High
Shutter Speed Slow Fast
Auto-Focus Non-existent Fast and Crisp
Video Non-existent Almost a RED
Viewfinder Non-existent Beautiful
Screen Non-existent Beautiful
Other Features Non-existent Many
Durability Cheap Durable
Lenses
Focal Length Fisheye Long Lens
Zoom Range Prime Large
Image Quality iPhone Leica
Size Small Large
Handling Clunky Natural
Build Quality Cheap Durable
Low Light Capabilities Useless Fantastic
Auto-focus Non-existent Fast and Crisp
Image Stabilization Non-existent Excellent
---
I'll update the OP with everyone's suggestions as they are made! Thanks everyone.
**This thread was edited on May 8th 2014 at 2:45:24pm
Posts: 5077
-
Karma: 43,055
DSLR's
Size: Small ---------- Large
Load: Light ---------- Heavy
Ease of use: Easy ---------- Hard
Versatility: One Trick Pony-------super versatile
Image quality: Potato-------crispy
Adaptability: very adaptable ---------- not adaptable
Mic's
Size
Quality
Price
Ease of use
Durability
Lenses
Adaptability
Cost
Zoom range
Sharpness
Durability
Just some ideas, I'll check back in after some more thought
Posts: 982
-
Karma: 1,700
For stabilizers you might want to add something to do with ease of balancing. Maybe that goes along with ease of use or maybe it doesnt. But use might imply putting it into action and filming with it, whereas balancing is part of setup
Posts: 106
-
Karma: 11,255
I think all of them should have a cost/price, looks good otherwise!
Posts: 10056
-
Karma: 25,311
Rockwell factor: Pentax ------Leica
Precision engineering: India-------Switzerland
Bokeh: Macaulay Culkin---------As smooth as an ambessdors handshake
Posts: 8893
-
Karma: 7,634
This is great and all...but what if some of the "cameras" we use aren't dslr. Cough cough videographers cough cough. I personally would much rather review my hvx than my t2i...I use my hvx a lot more and prefer highly to my t2i.
It would be something like this:
Video Camera
Size Small Large
Weight Little -- Alot
Handling/Feel Clunky Natural
Max Resolution Small High
Shutter Speed Slow Fast
Auto-Focus Non-existent Fast and Crisp
Viewfinder Non-existent Beautiful
Screen Non-existent Beautiful
Other Features Non-existent Many
Durability Cheap Durable
Image Control Little--A lot
ND FIlters Yes -- No
XLR Options Yes -- No
Recording Format Easy -- A bitch (i.e avchd vs dvcpro or something)
Lens Adaptability Yes -- No (Does it need a redrock adapter to have canon lens'? Is there a bayonett mount? Does the camera natively take interchangable lenses? etc)
Hopefully this can somehow be incorporated. This would help with a lot of question alleviation in media in arts as I could just suggest them to a few reviewed cameras already in the review section rather than having to explain the difference between an HVX and t2i
All times are Eastern (-5)
