• Forums
  • Media And Arts
  • Convince me: A7s, GH4 with Nikon Speedbooster, or FS100 with Canon Speedbooster?

Member of the Month

partyandBS
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Convince me: A7s, GH4 with Nikon Speedbooster, or FS100 with Canon Speedbooster?

profile picture
MaxBerkowitz
Posts: 440 - Karma: 2,611
Hey guys,

I'm having a lot of trouble deciding what to get for a camera. To start off, I mainly shoot mountain biking in low light environments, and I run a T3i with ML and Cinestyle.
You can see my style of shooting through these two vids:

http://www.pinkbike.com/video/339786/

http://www.pinkbike.com/video/348919/

For lenses I run a Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS, a Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, an SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4, and a Super Takumar 28mm f/3.5.

My budget is a little under 4000$, but I'd rather spend closer to 2500-3500 as then I can get the camera before summer and most of my gigs this year.

Let's run through the options:

Sell my 70-200 and 11-16, and buy a GH4 with a nikon speedbooster. Switch those lenses for their Nikon mount equivalents ( if you have any suggestions, other wise Tokina 11-16 Nikon, and Tamron 70-200 nikon)

Keep my lenses, get an FS100 used with an EF Speedbooster.

Keep my lenses, wait for the A7s, buy an EF to E adapter.

What should I do? I'm leaning towards the GH4 but I love the idea of a future upgrade to an FS700.

By the way, I'm in Canada, so I can sell my lenses for a fair bit more than you USA folks.
Apr 17 2014 3:28PM
25 6
profile picture
lIllI
Posts: 1255 - Karma: 1,986
Manually-accessed remote locations => GHx

Easily accessible => fs100


Ergonomic practicality notwithstanding, I'd take a GH4 over an fs100 for the 10-bit alone.
Apr 17 2014 3:33PM
3 0
profile picture
plorr
Posts: 3131 - Karma: 528
Yeah, I would go with a GH4 + Atomos Ninja or Blackmagic Hyperdeck.

10 bit 4:2:2 is a big deal, and recording straight to ProRes is pretty much an ideal work flow. Plus a lot of people get boners over 4K and high frame rates, so it doesn't hurt to have those too.

Switching to Nikon glass is a good call too if you are doing purely video. That way pretty much any camera you need to rent or end up switching to in the future, you already have a set of glass that can easily be used on it.
Apr 17 2014 4:32PM
3 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61665 - Karma: 123,645
MaxBerkowitzKeep my lenses, get an FS100 used with an EF Speedbooster.


Honestly, if you're shooting low light a lot, being able to pump up to 1600 or even 3200 ISO is clutch as fuck.


Sent you a PM.
Apr 17 2014 5:44PM
2 0
profile picture
steezysteeze
Posts: 1739 - Karma: 1,012
pussyfooterHonestly, if you're shooting low light a lot, being able to pump up to 1600 or even 3200 ISO is clutch as fuck.


Sent you a PM.


With the A7s it seems as though you could pump it up well past 3200:

http://youtu.be/XgbUgNiHfXM


If you're shooting low light op the A7s seems crazy
Apr 17 2014 6:16PM
1 0
profile picture
Bhroscoe
Posts: 145 - Karma: 524
steezysteezeWith the A7s it seems as though you could pump it up well past 3200:

http://youtu.be/XgbUgNiHfXM


If you're shooting low light op the A7s seems crazy


Agreed. While all three are great cameras, for low light the a7s looks phenomenal. I also think it depends on your ergonimics preference. I guess we will have to see how the a7s really is.
Apr 17 2014 6:45PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61665 - Karma: 123,645
steezysteezeWith the A7s it seems as though you could pump it up well past 3200:

http://youtu.be/XgbUgNiHfXM


If you're shooting low light op the A7s seems crazy


I'm assuming the A7 and fs100 will both have similar capabilities seeing as they are both sony, similar sensors, etc. (theyre different sizes but same tech)
Apr 17 2014 6:45PM
0 0
profile picture
MaxBerkowitz
Posts: 440 - Karma: 2,611
The A7s is beautiful lowlight that is IMO better than the FS100.

However, that rolling shutter test was terrifiying.
Apr 17 2014 7:15PM
0 0
profile picture
Bhroscoe
Posts: 145 - Karma: 524
MaxBerkowitzThe A7s is beautiful lowlight that is IMO better than the FS100.

However, that rolling shutter test was terrifiying.


Oh Shit completely forgot about that video. Rolling shutter was horendous
Apr 17 2014 9:45PM
0 0
profile picture
RockNRollNghtClb
Posts: 2013 - Karma: 2,509
aside from getting a camera solely for low light, is the a7 the next "best" DSLR to upgrade to?
Apr 18 2014 7:34PM
0 0
profile picture
lIllI
Posts: 1255 - Karma: 1,986
Buying a camera based on its low light capabilities is like buying a car based on how well it drives while ramming against the guard rails.
Apr 18 2014 10:58PM
2 1
profile picture
Mitchell.
Posts: 1650 - Karma: 630
lIllIBuying a camera based on its low light capabilities is like buying a car based on how well it drives while ramming against the guard rails.


not uh, not exactly.
Apr 18 2014 11:56PM
2 2
profile picture
Japaneezy
Posts: 1039 - Karma: 4,267
pussyfooterI'm assuming the A7 and fs100 will both have similar capabilities seeing as they are both sony, similar sensors, etc. (theyre different sizes but same tech)


This is utterly bs
Aug 13 2014 8:20PM
2 1
profile picture
bkelly
Posts: 599 - Karma: 295
for me the advantages of the a7s would be, low light, full frame. Gh4 would be, 4k, and lower price. If wide angle work is important to you the gh4 will suffer as it is 4/3 sensor crop.
Aug 14 2014 2:38PM
1 1
All times are Eastern (-5)