Which skis for pow and non park?

All of those sizes are too small for you, I would go 180+. You'll be in more control and have a lot more fun on the mountain with a longer size.

You're 5'7? I'm 5'2 and ride 174 Moment Bibbys. I agree with the above comment, you should be in the low 180 range depending on how intense the rocker is.

found new sizes for the skis. Now i am looking at the sizes.

Size wise I would not say you need to go up top 180 sizes. You dont say how old you are but im guessing as your pretty short and weigh nothing your still growing. For this reason a longer ski may not be a good choice as they will weigh more and you will have to spend more energy on getting the skis to do what you want.

You will be fine on 170 range skis as you are light. you wont need the ski to be wide to help you float. I would think you could look at skis in the 100-110mm range. Maybe look at On3p JMO's, Salomon Rocker 108, rossi soul , armada TST. All those would be great all mnt skis which could still rip in fresh snow for someone your size. Try to demo some, its demo season at the moment so hopefully you can try some out.

Don't forget about the Jeffery's.  Also, 180+ skis seems a bit much with your stats unless your planning on straight charging.  Stick in the 170 range.

those fatypus skis are good and also Line Blend or sir francis bacon

I just skied a bunch of fat skis, next years atomic automatic 109 is the business! It's really easy, slarves and floats real nice, carbon stringers give it a ton of pop and some stabilty at speed.

In other news my favorite ski this day was the Voile V8, we had about 8" yesterday, 13" overnight, skiing big exposed lines today they are SOLID. Very nimble but stable, fun to throw around too.

Forget about the A Lotta. They are a super fat (140mm waist) specialty pow ski. They are not meant for anything besides really deep snow, likely from cat skiing. If you want skis that can hit groomers as well as pow, they would not be a good potion. The BG's would be great, but if you are into freestyle, the Jeffery 114's (next year) would be better.

I'm selling a set if basically new (drilled once and ridden once) rossignol squad 7 from 13/14 with the honeycomb tips. They are 180s and would be perfect for your size

Forgot that I also have some basically new 180 rocker2 122s that I'm selling for a friend. They actually have a 115 waist. Would be more playful than the billy goat or squad 7. Drilled once and ridden less than 5 days

uhhh the rocker 2 122's have a 122mm waist, hence the 122 in the name. the rocker 2 115's have a 115mm waist

The 192cm and 184cm lengths have a 122mm waist while the 180cm and 170cm have a 115mm waist.

FAIL... Get your facts straight before being a dick and calling someone out. HyphyHusky has it spot on. Good luck to the OP, sorry to cunt up your thread

bump

Need a bit more info to give you a real recommendation but with the info we have bacons in a 178 would be a relatively well rounded ski for what you are looking for. But overall more info would be nice.

I wouldn't go over 180ish. For pow it's ok to go long, but you really don't weigh much at all. You will float on a narrower ski just as well as a big guy on the extreme fats. Even short isn't that bad- I ride 176 jmos and I'm 5'9 185lbs. I like them because they are my park/tree/groomer ski. Quicker and more fun due to lighter weight and length. Can still do real hard stuff if I want to, fun in pow. When I go big mountain I use 189 k2 pontoons which are huge- and I love the length of those for what I ski them on. If this is a one quiver ski I think 180 in a 115 waisted ski would be good. 176 over 186- depending on if you are supposed to grow a lot more.

Personally I think any good skier should be able to have fun on groomers with almost any ski. For example those pontoons are just fine, can even ride switch and jib around (a bit, they are huge mofos haha) on them, no problems at speeds either.

Look at the on3p Jeffrey's, caylors, billy goats. If you. Can wait next year has some sweet skis. Rossignol super 7 would probably be good too