Your definition of a scientific law is wrong. Scientific laws, unlike theories, are simply things we have come to understand after repeated observations and do not work to explain the phenomena that is happening.
Take gravity as an example; Newton's law of gravitation describes what happens between two objects of non-zero mass, it's given by the formula Fgrav= G(m1*m2)/r^2. Newton's law of gravity is simply describing the relation between two masses when under the influence of gravity, it doesn't try to explain why this happens.
Quantum field theory however tries to explain why masses are attracted to each other through the exchange of virtual gravitons, it's not simply explaining the relationships that arise because of gravity but why those relations occur. That is the difference between a theory and a law.
The reason evolution is a theory and not a law has nothing to do with how correct it is (look at how accurate the standard model is, it's still a theory), it has to do with what it is explaining.
Also evolution could not be easily wrong. Evolution is simply the study of the changes of inherent characteristics in biological populations over time. In layman's terms it is the study of organisms changing over time. I don't know how you think this could easily be wrong however if you do think this is untrue take one biology class, the amount of evidence that supports evolution is utterly staggering.
Finally I have never had a teacher mention religion in class (besides on bio prof who openly stated he was religious), the reasons I don't follow the bible are all my own and are not the results of people telling me to reject religion.
