Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Looking for new skis - Symmetrical, Rocker, Soft

profile picture
Miomo
Posts: 4302 - Karma: 14,133
So yeah, my Afterbangs started falling apart mid-way through the second season of use, and I need new skis. Basically, I want a ski that's completely symmetrical, referably rocker (or Rocker-Camber-Rocker), lightweight, and really soft and buttery.

I'm 5'7"

Thanks in advance
Jan 26 2014 8:58PM
11 9
profile picture
steeze.pizza
Posts: 82 - Karma: 223
Atomic infamous. Light, flexy, symmetrical, cheap. Check them out. K2 domains are also rocker-flat-rocker and buttery, but I don't think they're the lightest skis out there.
Jan 26 2014 9:03PM
2 0
profile picture
jakejolo_9
Posts: 96 - Karma: 23
Line traveling circus. Never tried them but they fit what you want, they are also pretty durable I hear too, if Andy Parry can ski the same ski an entire year without completely destroying them, then they are a durable ski.
Jan 26 2014 9:11PM
1 3
profile picture
sammuss1
Posts: 31 - Karma: 333
ON3P filthy riches or Armada Halo 2! both are rocker in tip an tail, camber underfoot, but soft great skis! Filthy riches are directional, halos are not but both are great.
Jan 26 2014 9:12PM
2 2
profile picture
srg_bchkv
Posts: 200 - Karma: 170
Well FR is symmetrical, Halo is directional and both are not the softest ski out there. If you're ok with the medium soft flex these are great skis for you.


Jan 26 2014 11:57PM
0 0
profile picture
sammuss1
Posts: 31 - Karma: 333
thanks for the correction i meant symmetrical...

Jan 27 2014 6:26PM
0 0
profile picture
fredyferl
Posts: 2943 - Karma: 14,828
You're correct, I've had them since this summer and I've used them a bunch on my setup and skied on snow with them around 30 times and the edges are still fine. Really fun ski for rails and still holds well on jumps even if it's super soft. Definitely a good choice for the price and I'm really surprised on how well they hold
Jan 27 2014 9:19PM
0 2
profile picture
milk_man
Posts: 5252 - Karma: 5,983
K2 Domain! Some people say that it isn't a light ski but I think it's pretty light.

Rocker flat rocker is amazinnggg. Probably not so much for carving for a long period of time but I wouldn't know because I shred Minnesota
Jan 27 2014 9:44PM
2 1
profile picture
Miomo
Posts: 4302 - Karma: 14,133
So I searched for longer than I'm proud, but I got some pretty good research done. Just wrote down every ski I was interested in. The only things that you aren't really able to find on the internet are (swing) weights and stiffness.
ATM it's pretty much between the Infamous and Domains, but I've also heard good things about the Punx. I'm gonna see if I can make it down to a shop this week or something.

[notes got cut off in preview]
Jan 27 2014 10:04PM
0 0
profile picture
Miomo
Posts: 4302 - Karma: 14,133
*Only sizes are too big - Smaller Aces aren't symmetrical

4frnt - YLE*
177cm
138-118-138
4.85 lb
R-C-R

Nordica - Ace*
177cm
113-86-113
x
C

Line - Traveling circus
161, 171cm
119-93-119
4.4lb
C

Atomic - Punx
170cm
108.5-84-108.5
Less than 4.0lb
R10-C80-R10

Atomic - Infamous
171cm
116-86-116
3.6lb
R15-C70-R15

Majesty - Rock n Rolla
168cm
105-85-105
x
R-C-R

K2 - Domain
169
115-90-115
x
R-F-R

Volkl - Ledge
171
112-85-112
x
R-C-R

Winners-
Sidecut: Line TC
K2 Domain
Atomic Infamous

Profile: K2 Domain
Atomic Infamous
Atomic Punx

Weight(?): Atomic Infamous
Jan 27 2014 10:07PM
3 0
profile picture
HyphyHusky
Posts: 381 - Karma: 135
Weight: 1720g per pair

http://twotip.com/p/skis/atomic/atomic-infamous-1314-blackred-171-ffg-10-setup-15580
Jan 27 2014 10:09PM
0 0
profile picture
TACO-DOG.exe
Posts: 11988 - Karma: 12,261
well you just saved me a ton of time cuz i'm pretty much in the same situation as you!

i've been looking for the same kind of ski too and i was recommended the moment vice. i heard they're super light and buttery but i don't think they're symmetrical.
Jan 27 2014 10:30PM
0 0
profile picture
srg_bchkv
Posts: 200 - Karma: 170
My Domains 169 weighted 3700 g per pair.
Jan 27 2014 11:59PM
0 0
profile picture
ABalls
Posts: 2091 - Karma: 3,754
8lbs per ski at 169cm? you might be a bit off
Jan 28 2014 6:09PM
0 0
profile picture
FreeVillain
Posts: 747 - Karma: 260
Nordica soul riders
Jan 28 2014 7:13PM
0 0
profile picture
SimplyClean
Posts: 556 - Karma: 1,752
Line Blends
Jan 28 2014 7:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Miomo
Posts: 4302 - Karma: 14,133
I already had that. Out of all the weights I got, it was the lightest. That's why it was listed as a "winner" but with a question mark because it wasn't too accurate.
Jan 28 2014 7:57PM
0 0
profile picture
srg_bchkv
Posts: 200 - Karma: 170
Well no, 8 lbs a pair. 1850 g each ski.

And there is a mistake on twotip.com. 1720 g (3.7 lbs) is not for a pair, it's for a single ski. No way a pair of park skis can be that lightweight.
Jan 29 2014 2:06AM
0 0
profile picture
p-fo
Posts: 9372 - Karma: 6,155
I went from shitty Afterbangs to the Domains. The Domains are awesome. I love mine. So much fun.
Jan 29 2014 2:11AM
0 0
profile picture
Nicko1981
Posts: 527 - Karma: 180
Have a look into the liberty antigen; its a price point ski but still has the bamboo core. Its rocker camber rocker, 93 underfoot; really light and graphics are cool. Also uses the new top sheet that's going into all liberty for 2015; textured and more chip-resistant.
Jan 29 2014 5:30AM
0 0
profile picture
GeorgeL98
Posts: 13 - Karma: 214
The new chronics (line) are good, I've been on them for about a month and so far I've seen great performance in and out of the park, they are fairly light, and rockered, plus they are surprisingly poppy as well as flexible they are a little pricy but in my opinion they are 200% worth it. Plus the design on them is sick
Jan 29 2014 6:16AM
0 0
profile picture
srg_bchkv
Posts: 200 - Karma: 170
I agree with that. Most playful ski I've owned, really light and buttery. The bases don't hold wax though.
Jan 29 2014 2:09PM
0 0
profile picture
JackDeLoot
Posts: 153 - Karma: 93
J skis.
I have the 90 width underfoot "snowboarding is cool' and they are awesome! super buttery with its 4 radius rocker but the camber and wood core keeps it stiff under foot. sounds like what u want, but there are lots of skis that fit that descrip..., keep in mind that j skis have the 2.5mm thick edges and nice and thick bases for durability, i been lovin mine!

http://jskis.com/products/snowboarding-is-cool
Jan 29 2014 7:44PM
0 0
profile picture
blazer258
Posts: 1101 - Karma: 646
I'm between these and Fatypus L-toros and not sure what to get yet, l toros are super light and soul riders are a bit heavier, both have a rocker profile too
Jan 29 2014 8:30PM
0 0
profile picture
Pillow_Line
Posts: 20 - Karma: 110
Check out the Pillow Line Uber Chronics. They have a wicked soft flex like a piece of uncooked rigatoni!
Jan 29 2014 8:51PM
0 0
profile picture
s-hand
Posts: 1334 - Karma: 1,800
check out the ATRificial Nurture.  118/88/118 i believe and rocker.
Jan 30 2014 11:18AM
0 0
profile picture
Slowbro
Posts: 3863 - Karma: 21,308
RMU Wisco would fit your needs well if they aren't sold out already http://www.rockymountainunderground.com/shop/wisco
Jan 30 2014 12:01PM
0 0
profile picture
ABalls
Posts: 2091 - Karma: 3,754
Ok ok that makes more sense then whatever the fuck I said, that would be cool though, some 1.5 lb park skis
Jan 30 2014 1:45PM
0 0
profile picture
Nicko1981
Posts: 527 - Karma: 180
This is true, extruded base to keep the cost down in first couple of years; 2015s will have the same base as the rest of the line which will be a huge improvement.
Jan 30 2014 6:28PM
0 0
profile picture
Miomo
Posts: 4302 - Karma: 14,133
So I've visited a few shops, but nobody had the Infamouses or Domains. I don't know if anyone's had experience with both, but I don't know how stiff or heavy they each are, so if you can compare, that'd be great. Thanks.
Feb 1 2014 5:46PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)