It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
I DID WATCH IT, you fuck. Unlike you, I spent the time to understand the situation before I argued one side or another.
And no, they were not found "not guilty", they were acquitted. This means that there was not enough factual evidence to support the prosecution's argument, probably because the key witness (Thomas) is in his grave and the only other people there were these assholes who beat a man to death. The only evidence the prosecution had was the above video. Similarly, not guilty does not equate with innocent. It's pretty clear that these people mercilessly beat this guy until he died.
All this negates the MASSIVE conflict of interest that is inherent in cases like this. Brutality cases are often investigated internally by employees of the city or even the police department. To win a case is damn near impossible when facing a deck so stacked as this.
All my points are still valid, your reading comprehension still sucks,and you have made exactly zero compelling arguments relating not to my own posts but to the issue of the case.
How are you not getting this? My posts are directly related to yours. I've been literally QUOTING things you're saying. And nice try with the poor reading comprehension skills. You just have poor writing/life/ethics skills. Eat one.