It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
I'm curious as to why the toe shape that I first saw on Markers a few years ago is now on the Guardian/Tracker, and now Tyrolia has adopted a similar toe design on the Attack series. I understand they are not identical, but they definitely all stem from the same starting place. What about this shape is so good?
On touring bindings like the Guardian/Tracker a shorter toe piece is more practical. It allows the pivot point near the toe of the boot to be closer to the ski when "walking".. or something like that.
No one copied Marker... if anything Marker copied Fritschi Diamir. You know why? You can't have a pivoting binding with long, triangular shaped toe piece. It won't pivot enough. You need to have a design with a horizontal spring to make that happen. It's a mechanical necessity, not a design copy.
Didn't say they copied. I don't even like Marker. I was just using that as a reference point since I don't know a technical term for this specific design.
The 'wings' on the lateral spring toe pieces such Markers or Tyrolia's AAAtack can move individually as well which give more elastic glide in either direction before they release
By moving the picot point back, you're giving it a better stride. Low Tech bindings hinge right at the toe and it is a very natural stride whereas the farther away from the toe's natural stride point, the more they'll tour like a pile of dicks.