Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
wtf? I cannot believe I am reading this. The baby was born, out of her body, alive and well. That's a living person.
You people who are pro-choice have gotten so fucked up in your definition of when a baby becomes a baby that you don't even understand that an actual out-of-the-womb child is a baby?!
yes
"Yes, she chose to kill her baby, but before we decide how she should be punished, shouldn't we consider why? If there are mitigating factors that persuaded the girl to act the way she did, shouldn't we take them into account?"
that's what a trial is for. they don't take all evidence and defense into account when pressing charges, the charges are pressed based on the crime that was committed. All of the mitigating factors are where the trial comes into play.
I guess I just don't understand why you'd sympathize with her or give her the benefit of the doubt prior to knowing anything about her or the situation. You're jumping to all sorts of conclusions to try and justify the crime, when there is no need. It will all come out in the trial-- whether she was mentally ill, abused, or just a fucked up individual-- we will know at some point, so why blindly defend her? At this point, all you know is that she killed a person.