But why not post it via Freeskier? Hell, why not post it on Newschoolers? And hey, shouldn't the standard in journalism be honest reviews? Nate Abbott is the senior editor of Freeskier -- which reaches 325,000 readers per issue... and I'd be willing to bet a large chunk of them would love to hear Nate's opinion (even if it's just as a secondary review), as he's the one driving the bus and telling them who's the hottest pro or what gear you need to have.
Here is the Freeskier's review for Into the Mind --
Into The Mind by Sherpas Cinema is the recipient of this year’s iF3 Award for Best Editing and Film of the Year. To sum it up, the film centers around an unnamed skier as he attempts to conquer one of the gnarliest mountain faces I’ve ever seen on film. Various athlete segments throughout serve as symbols of what is going through the skier’s head as he makes the decision to ski this high consequence mountain face. Into The Mind delves into the human psyche, exploring the balance between risk and reward; the decision to accept defeat or stand up and conquer goals that have not yet been reached; what drives humans (skiers specifically) to rise above the challenges in their lives and sport, and what is learned along the way. The film consists of thirteen chapters, each exploring a different mental process in the journey to ski this ultimate face.
The title, Into The Mind, is perfect, as the film does a magnificent job utilizing the various athlete segments to tell a story of the decision making processes, internal conversations, memories, etc… that flood the minds of skiers everywhere. Standout performances from Callum Pettit, Kye Petersen, Ian MacIntosh, Tom Wallisch, JP Auclair and more mesh perfectly with the masterful cinematography, directing, and special effects of the Sherpas crew. In this case, the usage of a main objective and surrounding stories that come to the head in the form of both failure and then success, creates a film that is thought provoking, relatable, and visually inspiring—thanks to the editing and cinematography, the showcasing of amazing places on earth that most can only dream of visiting, and the athletes that work so hard to make them come alive.
Here are some comments from NS regarding the segment, which were posted on November 14th --
"So... 2 1/2 minutes of guys playing around with their cameras and doing cute little editing tricks, a minute of quick shots of someone skiing by with sparks flicking away and 30 seconds of actual skiing... how'd this win SKI movie of the year? Cool ideas but these Sherpa guys seem to love themselves more than what they're actually filming and in terms of ski movies, that was fucking horrible. I hope the whole movie isn't like that but I doubt it."
"Wheres the actual skiing? That was all filler, no killer. I almost had a seizure"
"Pretty cool concept. I can't say it was one of my favorite sections of Into The Mind. If they had just made the skiing like 40% more visible i think it would have been much better. The move is great though.. this just happens to be arguably the weakest segment."
"that blew. i wanna see some skiing, not some artsy fartsy cannes bullshit. stick to the basics, filming some people doing cool stuff on skis, not projecting random fucking eagles on everything and trucking innocent ice skaters."
"felt like a lame olympics preview or something... dramatic music, stupid editing, weird juxtaposition with 'real mountain' skiing like urban is some new fad....."
"well that was weird as fuck. i've got so many questions. Why was there an eagle on a wall? Why were there so many 360s? Who and why was hiking the stairs all the time? Where did they get all that speed from? Whats upp with the 10ft banger handrail? like all im saying if they wanted to do a artsy ass street seggy. They could've done it a lot better then projecting eagles on walls and shit"
"First off all, the filming and editing was cool as fuck. But this needs more skiing! I actually agree with many of those who says this is just a film for the creators to show off their skills behind the lens. And for a movie like this that had like 4 million dollars in budget, could have done a lot better job with the sound-editing, the sound in this sucks ass! NEVER FORGETT THE SOUND!!!!"
"I heard this movie has a brutally low amount of skiing, and that edit proves it. Very creative, props for the filming and editing prowess but overall it was distracting and kinda hard to watch, could barely see a lot of the tricks. Agree with the homies above, the all.i.can section in Nelson and Trail was way better."
"I watch ski movies to watch skiing. If I want to watch an intelligent film, I'll watch some Kubrick shit or something."
---
tl;dr Great stuff Nate, I know posting something like this isn't easy... but why should honesty be an exception and not the norm?