It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Not at all. Her face just does not look human. I could maybe see how people might possibly think she is a little attractive, but a dream girl? Hell naw, not even close
^
-too many rings on her fingers
-tie doesn't match booty shorts
-messy room (what a slon, i mean, really?)
-eyebrows not symmetrical/too much eyeliner
thanks for keeping your cool and not showing us what a primitive vocabulary you have.... at any rate, i think she looks her best when she's doing her thing on stage. that's when she's my dream girl
You know what would be more fun than this? Wrangle up pics of all the guys on NS and let the girls rip them apart. Note: this isn't a criticism of the guys on here critiquing porn stars and models, I honestly just think it would be funny to hear the funny comments.
This is on a scale of dream girls, not the standard solid seven scale. As far as dream girls go a 4 is low but I wouldn't put her more than a 6. I hear she's a bitch
I'm going to take a very unpopular position and it may seem random to some but we have had discussions about this topic before: I find Olivia Munn more attractive Sara Underwood.
Before you go insane let me explain. In photos Sara is more attractive then Olivia by a factor of like 100 but in motion Olivia Munn is more attractive (naked yoga does not factor into this observation). It's kind of like Dreama Walker who looks attractive but kind of weird in photos but anybody who watched Don't Trust the Bitch in Apartment 23 knows she is ridiculously attractive. Hate all you want