Syria

On August 21st 2013, chemical weapons were utilized yet again in the Syrian conflict.

Particularly, the US and France did not waver for a moment to take advantage of this terrible

tragedy, calling it, ‘A Crime Against Humanity’ as well as urging forceful action upon

ostensible findings. All in using it as a catalyst to announce preparation for military strikes

against the Syrian Government.



The United States has had Syria and Iran in its crosshairs for quite some time. Four Star

General Wesley Clark states, “I talked to one of the Generals in the Joint staff, he showed me a

memo that describes on how we are going to take out seven countries in five years. Starting

with Iraq, then Syria, then Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finishing off with Iran.” The US

government does not like to present their wars as empire building but instead paints

themselves as defenders of democracy. They are willing to flat out lie and kill thousands of

people just to advance their political objectives. For example, during the Iraq War they tried

accusing Saddam Hussein with still harboring the chemical weapons that the US provided him

in his War against Iran. Thirty or so years ago, the US was trying to take out the Iranians

because they did not like the fact that their marionette ‘The Shah’ had been ousted in 1979. As

Wesley Clark pointed out the endgame is still and always will be Iran.



The US government tried to go after Iran directly by accusing them of building nuclear

weapons. However, this pitiful propaganda decked itself, when elements within the CIA and

Mossad came forward stating that there was no evidence that Iran intended on even building

nuclear weapons. Thus, they switched their strategy and went after Syria to expose Iran.

Aforementioned, Syria and Iran have a Mutual defense agreement; hence if in fact NATO forces

enter Syria Iran will be drawn into the fight.



The US and NATO have been running a proxy war by arming and funding the FSA. Funneling

these resources through their allies in the region. To obscure the source of this support, Qatar

has been used to purchase the weapons from countries like Sudan and route them to Syria via

Turkey. Qatar is a close military ally of the US; they provided tank support in the Gulf War of

1991 and Qatar also served as the US Central Command Headquarters during the US invasion

of Iraq in 2003.



January of 2013, it was reveled that emails and a large quantity of sensitive documents from

Britam Defense, a UK based military contractor, were leaked by a hacker. These documents

exposed a proposal coming from Qatar to launch false flag chemical weapons attacks in Syria

and to blame it on the Syrian Government. According to the documents the plan had the full

support of Washington and enormous sums of money had been offered for the project. David

Goulding, the managing director of Britam was the person sending these emails. The recipient

was Phillip Doughty, dynamic director and founder of Brtiam Defense. The hacker was able to

obtain the scans of Doughty’s passports, resume as well as the passports of the Ukrainian

operatives that the email suggested should be used to carry out the attack. The documents

also revealed details regarding a contract with Saudi Arabia to help prepare their forces for a

War with Iran. The mainstream media never mentioned the hacked documents and what was

being discussed here was clearly a war crime. “Verify via linked documents.”



Three months later, March 19th sarin gas was used in Aleppo, Syria. Israel and the US blamed

the Syrian government for the attack, even though many of those killed were Syrian

government soldiers. Obama then began talking about the event as a ‘red line’ that had been

crossed. However, the UN investigated the issue and on May 6th 2013 UN investigator Carla

Del Ponte went public, stating that it was in fact the Syrian rebels that utilized sarin gas and

that there was no sign that the Syrian government launched any chemical attacks whatsoever.

Russian’s US ambassador Vitaly Churkin agreed with Del Ponte after Russian experts visited

the location and took their own samples. Those samples were then analyzed in a Russian

laboratory certified by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. According to

the lab results, they discovered that the presence of Hexogen utilized as an opening charge

and which is not used in standard chemical emissions pointed to the attack being launched by

the Syrian rebels. Rather than cover-up this development, the main stream media simply

changed the subject.



Following this event, the US increased their support significantly. In July, the US openly began

discussing kinetic strikes against Syria as if their lies hadn’t been exposed. Shortly after, on

August 21st 2013 the US attempted once again to frame the Syrian government. Initially, the

media coverage tried to pin the attack on the Syrian government and the US and France

instantly came out condemning Assad. By August 24th the Pentagon already announced plans

for missile strikes. That very day the Syrian army came forward with footage to back up their

report that they uncovered a massive chemical weapons stash in Rebel tunnels in the

Damascus suburbs of Jawbar. This is the exact neighborhood of where the chemical weapon

attack took place.



Evidence, on May 31st 2013 Turkey finds a 2kg cylinder filled with sarin gas in homes of Syrian

militants.



On July 7th the Syrian army went public regarding a chemical lab that they found belonging to

the Syrian rebels outside the city of Damascus. In addition, the documents showing that the US

was backing a plan to frame the Syrian government.



What is the motive? The only parties that benefit from the ensuing attack are the Syrian rebels,

the US and its allies. The Syrian government knows full well that NATO and the US have been

looking for any accuse to invade. The rebels on the other hand have already been caught

committing ruthless killings as well as creating fake videos of civilian casualties. Two days

after the attack, the Syrian rebels release a video statement vowing to strike back with any and

all means. They claimed to have access to chemical weapons and they stated that they now

intended to use them with zero misgivings from this point forward. Basically, they are using

their own crime for a pretext to openly utilize chemical weapons in battle.



Russia and china have both openly sided with Syria and Iran. Russia has also warned that a

thermonuclear war could occur if in fact the US continues down its path. If the US invades a lot

of civilians will die. Their situation is not going to be enhanced by the US attacking, anymore

than it was in Iraq.



Leaked Britam Defense Documents-

http://www.amazon.com/gp/drive/share?ie=UTF8&s=G6_SxjA3RnEpXfvn8WZ8Aw

Torrent Link-

http://thepiratebay.sx/torrent/8062415/Britam_millitary_server_hacked._Syriah_false_flag._Co
nfidential_


Sources-

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/08/24/gas-attack-syria.html

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/08/25/secret_cia_files_prove_america_helped_saddam_as_he_gassed_iran

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/mossad-cia-agree-iran-has-yet-to-decide-to-build-nuclear-weapon-1.419300

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/feb/17/usa.syria

http://rt.com/news/iran-troop-deployment-syria-782/

http://www.globalresearch.ca/americas-imperial-left-and-the-proxy-war-against-syria/5343850

http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/world/2013/06/29/sending-missiles-syrian-rebels-qatar-muscles/cwud7bKcQgptno2P7QgNsO/story.html

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/01/syria-conflict-rebels-qatar-weapons

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/05/04/301705/russia-opposes-arming-militants-in-syria/

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/17/us-g8-russia-idUSBRE84G18M20120517

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/01/30/286331/ukqatari-plot-against-syria-revealed/

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/04/israel-accuses-syria-of-using-chemical-weapons-probably-sarin/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9488314/Barack-Obama-red-line-warning-over-chemical-weapons-in-Syria.html

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/21/us-syria-crisis-chemical-un-idUSBRE92K0OY20130321

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22424188

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/09/us-syria-crisis-chemical-russia-idUSBRE9680YZ20130709

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/24/us-syria-crisis-jobar-idUSBRE97N04T20130824

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/23/us-syria-chemicals-idUSBRE97M0U820130823

http://news.yahoo.com/iran-says-proof-syria-rebels-used-chemical-weapons-004613934.html

http://rt.com/news/sarin-gas-turkey-al-nusra-021/

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/171240#.Uhrr2rwYfUp


Initially stated-

The bombings in Syria conducted by Israel are actually indirect attacks on Iran. Syria and Iran

are bound by a mutual defense pact and are strategic alliances. The US and Israel's senate

resolution 65, surely to pass states that congress reaffirms the long-standing bonds of

friendship and cooperation between the United States and Israel, supports the full

implementation of U.S. and international sanctions on Iran, recognizes the tremendous threat

posed to the United States, the West, and Israel by Iran's pursuit of a nuclear weapons

capability, yet they haven't even decided to create a nuclear warhead as stated by the CIA. It

also urges that if Israel is compelled to take military action in self-defense against Iran's

nuclear weapons program the U.S. government should provide Israel with diplomatic, military,

and economic support. Thus, the foreign relations committee voting to endorse resolution 65,

(April 17, 2013) is the latchkey should Israel attack Iran. By now, people should know Israel

has openly indicated its desire to use military force on Iran. Formerly, on January 30th of this

year the US government stated that the Syrian government was using chemical weapons

against its own people. However, findings via Del Ponte state that it in fact was the Syrian

rebels that used chemical weapons. Thus, mysteriously, the Obama Administration backed

down from previous claims. I believe this was done to create the ostensible reason for military

involvement. To back these claims, documents from a UK base defense contractor revealed

that a plan by Qatari was to have the firm provide false evidence that Syria would give the go

ahead to use chemical weapons in said country. According to these documents, this plan had

full proof from the US government. Hence, NATO possibly facilitated the use of chemical

weapons. Iran-backed Hezbollah weapons were said to be the target according to Israel. The

real motive however, was to derail Syria’s progress in their fight against foreign militants

originally from Lebanon. Hezbollah who sides with president Assad’s regime, says that it was a

war against foreign backed terrorists. Iran has sent over 4,000 troops to aid Assad and RUssia

s-300, have responded to take Syria's side as well as China. Hence, NATO is backing up these

rebels despite carnages and the use of chemical weapons. This is all about how Iran has one of

the largest oil reserves; in addition they are not cooperating with the US. The USA's excuse to

invade Syria is the excuse to draw Iran into an exposed conflict. The benefits using a figure

head is that they are completely disposable. The Egyptian Revolution ties into what is going on

in Syria. IMF/world bank loans, US backs this fully and ElBaradei urges consensus to win IMF.

Suez Canal is a wanted geological feature (75% of worlds sea-trade.) Understand that the

leaders of Egypt are puppets and when a puppet such as Mubarak does not send troops to Iraq

during the 2003 invasion and rejects the joining of US Nuclear Umbrella the US will covertly

fund opposition groups to take him out of office. Egypt at the time was the second largest

power under foreign aid. THe leaders are puppets, Egypt's military should be reinvented in the

case that they have the right to pick their leader.



Sources-

http://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-resolution/65

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/01/30/286331/ukqatari-plot-against-syria-revealed/

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/17/us-g8-russia-idUSBRE84G18M20120517

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/01/17997650-iran-backed-hezbollah-warns-it-may-intervene-in-syria-war?lite

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/05/us-syria-crisis-blasts-idUSBRE94400020130505

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22424188

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/ene_oil_res-energy-oil-reserves

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/05/world/middleeast/israel-syria.html?_r=1&

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/24/us-syria-crisis-usa-sarin-idUSBRE93N01W20130424

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/barak-nuclear-iran-far-more-dangerous-than-preemptive-israeli-strike-1.453645

http://www.euronews.com/2013/07/10/russia-claims-evidence-of-chemical-weapons-use-by-syrian-rebels/

Huh...What happened in January?

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57575054/syria-rebels-regime-blame-each-other-for-first-alleged-chemical-weapons-attack/

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/24/usa-egypt-imf-idUSL2N0DB13M20130424

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/02/12/uk-egypt-elbaradei-economy-idUKBRE91B1J720130212

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2013/07/2013775214936989.html

http://www.thestar.com.my/News/World/2013/07/04/ElBaradei-tops-list-to-head-Egypt-government--sources.aspx

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323419604578569830070537040.html#articleTabs%3Dvideo

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/30/egyptian-leader-iran-syrian-rebels

http://www.ipsnews.net/2009/08/disarmament-egypt-rejects-us-nuclear-umbrella/

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/world/15aid.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/middle-east/ex-mubarak-deputy-says-us-funded-opposition-during-uprising

http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/dept/scwmss/projects/suez/ms-eng-c-6168.html

http://www.eia.gov/countries/regions-topics.cfm?fips=wotc&trk=p3

http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/egypt-rules-out-joining-us-nuclear-umbrella/

http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/138623/joshua-stacher/why-the-generals-back-morsi