Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Filthy rich vs Scott jib tw

profile picture
derek.urben
Posts: 314 - Karma: 386
Need a solid quick answer.
Mar 15 2013 9:31PM
14 4
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
Yes.
Mar 15 2013 9:39PM
6 0
profile picture
JWeinstock
Posts: 3439 - Karma: 1,352
and
Mar 15 2013 10:49PM
0 0
profile picture
El_Barto.
Posts: 11661 - Karma: 24,345
hahaha

This is so perfect for multiple reasons
Mar 15 2013 11:07PM
0 0
profile picture
DeRizzo
Posts: 3827 - Karma: 3,485
FILTHY RICH. Haven't even skied on them but I have Scott Punisher jibs and I've used them only this season and it looks like I've been using them for 3.
Mar 15 2013 11:15PM
1 0
profile picture
Thawg
Posts: 360 - Karma: 542
The Scott Punisher Jibs and the Scott Jib TW are completely different skis. The Jib TW has a wider under foot, better/stronger base(Race base), stronger and thicker edges, and has a different flex pattern. I also have the Scott Punisher Jibs and they get thrashed up really quick, but the Jib TW is a completely different ski and was built to be more durable; the people at scott didn't want to get a bad rep for their skis once they started getting big(when they got TW) so they made their park ski better. So what you said basically doesn't matter at all.
Mar 17 2013 1:03PM
1 1
profile picture
Ali_Dibden
Posts: 1966 - Karma: 1,688
Filthy Rich, I have them, they are incredible, enough said.
Mar 17 2013 1:32PM
0 0
profile picture
DeRizzo
Posts: 3827 - Karma: 3,485
Oh sorry...bitch
Mar 17 2013 6:01PM
4 3
profile picture
AndyMcC33
Posts: 92 - Karma: 23
I'm not sure if the tw jibs are the same but I have punisher jibs and I ruined them pretty quickly
Mar 17 2013 7:23PM
0 0
profile picture
Thawg
Posts: 360 - Karma: 542
I was just trying to help the guy who needs new skis, not you. sorry you got offended by it.
Mar 17 2013 8:25PM
0 0
profile picture
DeRizzo
Posts: 3827 - Karma: 3,485
Yeah I guess what I said doesn't matter at all
Mar 17 2013 8:50PM
0 0
profile picture
SkiTheYeast
Posts: 2310 - Karma: 391
Filthy rich/thread
Mar 17 2013 10:02PM
1 0
profile picture
Park.
Posts: 2480 - Karma: 4,582
but thats not right though...
Mar 18 2013 11:18AM
0 0
profile picture
Thawg
Posts: 360 - Karma: 542
explain to me what is not right.
 http://www.scott-sports.com/us/en/products/2241109992158/ski-scott-jib-tw-a-version-158/
That is the webpage for the TW jib. if you click on 'features' it explains half of the things that I said, and if you click on 'size chart' then it says the underfoot on each length; my 178 Scott Punisher jibs are an 82 underfoot and each length of the TW jib is wider than that.
Mar 18 2013 11:25PM
0 0
profile picture
Park.
Posts: 2480 - Karma: 4,582
but, but it is the same ski except the TW has a race base... it even says that in freeskier mag for the review of the jib:
http://freeskier.com/gear/products/scott-jib-skis
Mar 19 2013 9:03AM
0 0
profile picture
Thawg
Posts: 360 - Karma: 542
it is the same ski as this years Scott Jib ski just it has race base, not last years scott punisher jib.
Mar 21 2013 8:22PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)