Member of the Month

Biffbarf
February, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Touring binding

profile picture
*ninja*
Posts: 2108 - Karma: 1,144
looking for a good touring binding i've looked at dukes but ive heard there heavy. Any RednA bindings you guys would suggest to me....? +k for solid answers
12 years ago
8 4
profile picture
snakerton
Posts: 2434 - Karma: 1,977
what type of skier are you
What do you ski
What skis do you have
how much do you weigh
Looking for a tech binding or a din binding?
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
*ninja*
Posts: 2108 - Karma: 1,144
sry about that 5'7 135 i ski pow 26.5 full tilt boot thx
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
*ninja*
Posts: 2108 - Karma: 1,144
someone help please!
12 years ago
0 1
profile picture
Huck_Norris
Posts: 11487 - Karma: 18,627

Holy shit hahaha that's the best incorrect spelling of Randonee I've ever seen. 

But yes.  Dukes are fine.  Good binding to ski inbounds and dabble in the bc as well.   

12 years ago
1 1
profile picture
SamtheEagle
Posts: 1658 - Karma: 713
if you are going to mostly be skiing inbounds (85% inbounds) then

Duke or Tracker/Guardian 16 if you need that high of din

or

Baron or Tracker/Guardian 13 if you can get away with a 13 din (lighter weight = better for touring)

If you are going to be doing a fair bit of touring (60% inbounds)

Tour F12 or Fritschie Freeride

If you are going to be doing a lot of touring (more than half the time)

Dynafit, Plum, other dedicated AT bindings
12 years ago
2 0
profile picture
LC.
Posts: 5952 - Karma: 2,423
F10 will be fine for you. I know strong skiers who weigh 170lbs+ who have had no problems with F10 & F12s.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Casey
Posts: 7929 - Karma: 25,559
135 lbs doesnt need the duke.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
VD.
Posts: 4054 - Karma: 4,565
Hopefully this will answer some of your questions

12 years ago
1 0
profile picture
*ninja*
Posts: 2108 - Karma: 1,144
its how i abbrevate it... not sure i want to get dukes i heard they are bad to skin with.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
.MASSHOLE.
Posts: 7540 - Karma: 12,213
if by bad you mean heavy, then its true but theyre bomber if you want to do anything in bounds
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
no_steeze
Posts: 23992 - Karma: 4,273
it has to do entirely with how much you're planning on skinning. they are heavy and shitty to skin with, especially if you could be on dynafits, but if you're skiing inbounds too then you want a more alpine-oriented binding
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
charmander
Posts: 10636 - Karma: 373
How much are you gonna skin? Once you go Dynafit you'll NEVER go back.

Dukes suck, the pivot point is all fucked up and they have a ton f slop. The solly's are a lil better in my opinion but they still aren't that great.

If you're doing a lot of backcountry travel fritschis are decent, I have an older pair on some Karma's, they have a bunch of slop but they tour pretty well and are light.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
*ninja*
Posts: 2108 - Karma: 1,144
ya i think im gonna go with dynafits
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
ankhou
Posts: 505 - Karma: 238
Bear in mind that you'll need a tech binding compatible boot for this. Full Tilts do not have tech fittings.
12 years ago
1 0
profile picture
BlackcountryBill
Posts: 955 - Karma: 577
Tour f10s or 12s, I really can't see you needing dynafits if you have to be lead to that decision.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
camohard
Posts: 343 - Karma: 22
Dynafits or Plum. At 135lbs, I don't think you've got much to worry about in terms of bomberness. I saw Hoji looking to hit Jordan last week on Dynafits, so...
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Dirty.Harry.
Posts: 1779 - Karma: 351
That won't work with an FT boot, unfortunately. As Ankhou said, they do not have tech fittings so you would be looking at new boots and bindings, which is a steep price for occasional touring. I would recommend looking at non tech AT binders first, like the Fritschi Freeride Pro, Marker Tour F10/F12, Baron, or the Guartian 13 being released for next year. At 135 pounds you likely don't need a 16 DIN like the Duke or current Guardian/Tracker/Adrenalin.

Having said that, I had MFD/FKS for 1 year and put 25 backcountry days on them. I thought they worked great right up until the first day I used my Dynafit setup. Once you go Dynafit, you'll never go back. So if you want to spend the money and dedicate a setup pretty much completely to touring, then you will see the benefits.
12 years ago
1 0
profile picture
t-the-east
Posts: 131 - Karma: 219
Dynafits. I rock em inbounds quite a bit too. zero slop.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
+Tahoe_Shredder+
Posts: 189 - Karma: 124
get salomon guardians/atomic trackers... I have the trackers and they are just as heavy as dukes but its really not that bad... I took them on a full day tour and just today I was spinning threes on a backcountry jump... if i can spin a three on em, they aren't too heavy plus they are super solid and easy to use and just as expensive as dukes
12 years ago
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5); Currently it's 2:07AM