Member of the Month

partyandBS
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

On3p jeffrey questions + sizing?

profile picture
obeserabbit
Posts: 70 - Karma: 12
Hey guys, so I'm looking to buy my first pair of rockered skis and I'm kinda debating between the on3p jeffrey, caylor, or billygoats. I'm leaning towards the jeffrey right now since I'd mainly be using them in CO as well as VT, so I figured they'd be the most versatile.

I'm not really into park, but more into trees/chutes/powder. Can anyone comment on how the jeffreys are in tight trees? Also obviously the BG's would probably be most stable at speed, but how are the jeffreys when it comes to charging? And would the jeffreys (110 waist) still be fun in like 18+ inches?

I'm 5'4, 155lbs and I'm planning on going for either 171 or 176. I know that on3p measures their skis differently, so 176 would be a bit longer than a 176 from another company. Thoughts on 171 vs 176 for a shorter guy? I'd appreciate any input, thanks!
Feb 25 2013 7:31PM
2 0
profile picture
Jewschoolers
Posts: 1785 - Karma: 1,142
if i was you id go 176,  im assuming you will get taller
Feb 25 2013 7:39PM
0 0
profile picture
obeserabbit
Posts: 70 - Karma: 12
haha i'm 24, so i probably won't be getting any taller
Feb 25 2013 7:50PM
0 0
profile picture
Jewschoolers
Posts: 1785 - Karma: 1,142
i would still go 176
Feb 25 2013 7:57PM
0 0
profile picture
[J_Gasper]
Posts: 2983 - Karma: 1,594
Id view the Jeffrey as more as an all mtn ski vs. a powder ski. It would be perfect for VT riding, and yet, it will hold its own in CO. It is very nimble for its size, and for sure isn't sketchy at high speeds. Ive gotten over 60MPH on them (thanks ski app) and they are stable at those speeds. Id stay really the only place you would be bumming out in is the park. People use them in the park, but I personally find them a bit to burly for it. Personal preference thought. Ive ski'd then in 12-15 inches of untouched, and they still floated if you were going any sort of speed. They chop through variable conditions as well. Groomers come with ease. Seriously, I like riding Jeffreys on groomers more than chronics.

BG's will defiantly be better in deep snow, and I hear they are funner than hell in the trees. With the new RES, I hear they are pretty good on groomers for a fat ski.

If you want a ski that is gonna charge hard, the Wren would be your best bet. I personally have not ridden them, but I hear they are demanding, and that they are built for one thing only; and thats going fast.
Feb 25 2013 8:28PM
0 0
profile picture
[J_Gasper]
Posts: 2983 - Karma: 1,594
I forgot to mention...

For sure go 176. You have to size up with a rockered ski such as the Jeffrey. They will seem big at first, but once you get on snow, you will realize its nothing to big.
Feb 25 2013 8:30PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)