Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Canon 200mm 2.8, or is it a better option?
Posts: 451
-
Karma: 812
I am in the marked for a tele lens and the canon 200mm 2.8 looked like a good option for a good price. I will use it for sports, wildlife, alittle macro and some portraits. 97% photo.Since it being a prime, i am a little worried about the flexibility. I will probably buy some extention tubes for macro and some teleconverters for wildlife. Have anybody on here tried it? Is there a better option?
Posts: 31064
-
Karma: 29,404
Canon 70-200, worth saving for whatever model you were looking at.
or a 200 2.0L IS
Posts: 1357
-
Karma: 483
dat 6000 dollar price tag
Posts: 4931
-
Karma: 459
dont be scared off by a prime. i much prefer them, they'll make you a stronger photographer in the end. zooms just let you get lazy. my freshman photo professor always said the 3 most important words in photography are MOVE YOUR ASS.
All times are Eastern (-5)
