Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
Yes but isn't that stat just comparing vegas to non-vegas. But what about comparing vegans to non-vegans who watch their diet and eat healthy?
I don't think it's a fair comparison to just lump all "non-vegans" together. There's a big range there between those who eat healthy and those who eat crap. I'd like to see if a vegan diet will make someone live longer than a non-vegan who is really health conscious and balanced in their diet.
I just find it obnoxious when trend whore hypocrite vegans get on their high horse, as if calling themselves vegan somehow privies them to some sort of magical insight on human nutrition that the rest of us ignorant omnivores could not possibly understand. I understand that what you put in your body is your business but I would like to be afforded that same courtesy in the company of the so called enlightened vegans. Shit is seriously irritating.
I was asking about the comparison of a healthy balanced non-vegan diet in humans compared to a vegan diet.
A vegan dog does not eat all the same things as a vegan human and a non-vegan dog certainly does not act as an example of a human with a healthy non-vegan diet.
and you don't say an "average diet" is better than an "average diet"-- you compare the people on the diets. So yeah, of course the diet of an average vegan is healthier than the diet of an average non-vegan. But why would you compare the two in that regard? There's a big difference in that: everyone who is a vegan keeps a close watch on what they eat. Not everyone who is a non-vegan keeps a close watch on what they eat.
It is much more relevant and interesting to compare people who have strict and healthy diets. Those who include meat and animal bi-products and vs. those who don't, but both attempting to be as healthy as possible.
I feel like my post isn't very clear.
My point is that Vegans are on a diet. "non-vegans" group together every other kind of diet in the world and everyone who isn't on a particular diet (has no rules).
When you do it that way, you can say that about any diet: "paleos live longer than non-paleos," "low carbers live longer than non-low carbers," etc.
You need to compare diet to diet, and I guess I'd like to know if the lack of animal products is actually why vegas live longer, or is it just the eating better in general. Could I incorporate an extremely healthy and well balanced diet that includes animal proteins and live longer than vegans, on average?
It's a legit question.
thanks, good points