BUCKET CLIPS 3 | A FLINTA Ski Mixtape

Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Tell me something about this camera

profile picture
Bateman
Posts: 8593 - Karma: 8,600
Because i dont understand crap of all the stuff in the title

For instance; "
Rebel T2i 18 MP CMOS APS-C Sensor DIGIC 4 Image Processor"
que?

If you could just break down the info i'd be stoked. Oh, and+++++++++k
Jan 3 2013 5:06AM
1 0
profile picture
Laurent.
Posts: 10056 - Karma: 25,313
It's just a regular Canon EOS Rebel T2i with 18-55m Kit lens.

That said:

Canon: Brand
EOS: Model line (SLR)
Rebel T2i: Model (Kiss X4 in Japan and 550D in Euroland.)


This is all the same for every REBEL T2i and can be disregarded.

18 MP: 18 megapixel sensor.
CMOS: Sensortype (Note every EOS is CMOS apart from the ancient 1D)
APS-C: The size of the sensor. Has a 1,6X crop factor equivalent to 35mm.
DIGIC 4 Image Processor: It's just the type of signal processing and control unit of the camera.
Full-HD Movie Mode: No need to explain this.
Digital SLR Camera: Nor this
3.0-inch LCD: Size of back LCD.


As for the lens:

EF-S: EF-S lens mount which is a derivative of the EF lens mount.
18-55mm: Focal Range, comes down to a 35 mm equivalent of 28.8–88mm due to the 1,6 crop factor.
f/3.5-5.6: Maximum aperture at the nearest and farthest focal length.
IS: Image stabilization.
Lens: No need to explain this.
Jan 3 2013 6:25AM
0 0
profile picture
Bateman
Posts: 8593 - Karma: 8,600
Thank you very much Lawrence.


Love you.
Jan 3 2013 6:33AM
0 0
profile picture
Bateman
Posts: 8593 - Karma: 8,600
I heard something about how it's cleaver to buy a T2i without a lens, and buying a cheaper- yet better one seperately. Have i been misinformed, or are there any cheaper and better lenses out there?


Jan 3 2013 5:08PM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,943
Go and search around on a photography/videography website and you will learn a lot more then asking individual questions on NS.

As far as buying the kit lens with the body.

"it's cleaver to buy a T2i without a lens, and buying a cheaper- yet better one separately"

not true

It's better to buy just the body and save the money you would of spent on the kit lens on a better lens. That being said you will not find a cheaper lens then the kit lens, besides maybe the 50mm 1.8.

So

Cheaper: NO

Better: YES


Jan 3 2013 5:28PM
0 0
profile picture
Mag
Posts: 8155 - Karma: 14,809
Cheaper is not synonymous with low cost
Jan 3 2013 5:34PM
0 0
profile picture
Laurent.
Posts: 10056 - Karma: 25,313
It's always handy to have that 18-55m kit lens.

Just because it's so bloody cheap.
It might feel more poorly build then a McDonalds toy from even cheaper plastics but the optics are excellent for the price, and you won't need a macro lens for a while because it does that quite well.

Also it's lighter then earlier mentioned McDonalds toy.

It's cheap and cheerful.
Jan 3 2013 5:39PM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,943
not really sure what you're trying to say here.

Jan 3 2013 5:56PM
0 0
profile picture
Mag
Posts: 8155 - Karma: 14,809
Cheap means something is a good price for that product. Low cost means it is low value.
Jan 3 2013 6:02PM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,943
http://thesaurus.com/browse/low-cost
Jan 3 2013 6:11PM
0 0
profile picture
Mag
Posts: 8155 - Karma: 14,809
Adjective
(of an item for sale) Low in price; worth more than its cost.
Jan 3 2013 6:15PM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,943
You're right and i'm wrong, i'm not gonna sit here and argue word definitions with you. It's not relevant. OP knew what I meant and so did you.
Jan 3 2013 6:23PM
0 0
profile picture
Bateman
Posts: 8593 - Karma: 8,600
I guess ill just buy the whole pack or so (similar if not the same as the one in the OP), and then later on invest in a better lens if needed.

Or am i way off?
Jan 3 2013 6:59PM
0 0
profile picture
Laurent.
Posts: 10056 - Karma: 25,313
And get the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, it's only around 100 dollars and the optics are pure sex.
It's filmsy and plasticky as fuck but the optics are insanely good.
Jan 3 2013 7:14PM
0 0
profile picture
Tanner-D
Posts: 2061 - Karma: 4,116
I broke mine I would buy a 50mm pentax super tak f/1.4 with an adapter ring and get a lens that is built like a brick!
Jan 3 2013 7:57PM
0 0
profile picture
N.A.R
Posts: 181 - Karma: 357
It doesn't have a flip out screen.
Jan 3 2013 8:08PM
0 0
profile picture
Downtofilm
Posts: 6896 - Karma: 20,395
Click for larger image
Jan 3 2013 9:23PM
0 0
profile picture
j.bird
Posts: 6680 - Karma: 15
You have them completely reversed.

Something is "cheaply built" if it breaks easily and is of poor quality.

Low Cost means just that.... the cost was low. Low cost does not refer to value in any way. It only references the cost.
Jan 4 2013 2:12PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)