It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
I just got a pair of 2012 Line Chronics, they're 173cm's . I'm 5'11 150lbs, 16 yrs old. Even though it's too late now to return them, do you think these are too small for me, or are they a good size, I'm getting into park skiing but I'm very comfortable with riding skis.
It's my 1st year in the park (2nd if you count 1's/straight boxes last year) and I just picked up some 178cm '13 Chronics. I'm 5'11" and they feel fine. The 173s might feel a little short once you get better.
I'm 6' and I feel my 178's are too small. I would def say yours are but there's nothing you can do about it.Sometimes you can find people trying to trade for smaller skis, give ST a look.
They will be fine, the 2012 Chronic is a pretty solid/stable ski and with full camber the 173 will give you plenty of support for starting out in the park.
rode some park today on them, they feel like the perfect size for me, slid my first boxes sideways and did some 270s off. Definitely a great ski for anyone looking to buy 'em. Except the durability is terrible the top sheet chips really bad. Fun ski and really a do everything ski, pow and all
im 5' 9" and i have a pair of 173's they work just fine and i love them, but i could also even see myself riding the 178's and probably being just as content. i think ull do just fine!
i know the top sheet doesn't affect the performance obviously, but some people, like myself dont want their topsheet to wrecked after a couple laps in the park
might be a little short. Im 5'8 and have 171's and could maybe move up to a bigger size. either way, for getting into park, they shouldnt be an issue at all.