It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Domains? I mean I've owned both and the camber is what made the anthem a better ski, a bit of early rise would help but you get rid of the camber completely and they would more or less be domains.
A light, stable, playful, poppy ski. Something that could be used with dynafits, inserts and griffons. Something that would be stable when touring, just as good in pow as in more firm snow and be able to straightline and play around. 177cm /105-115mm
I'll agree with you on that. Leave the camber on the Anthem, but if they added Early Rise they'd be so sick. I still don't understand why Line has been behind on the rockered park ski movement.
Idk about the capwall.... lizzies are already light because the core is so thin. The 16 meter turn radius is the key part of the lizzies, simply extending the length without increasing tip and tail width would change them.
smaller waist for sure, they could stand to lose a bit of width in the tips if anything. Not much but 5-8mm off all the dimensions would be tight. The sidecut is perfect though, never mess with that!
full sidewall, 180, fully symmetrical ski that has a soft flex and is wider underfoot for small amounts of pow and stability in the park. Maybe some rocker or full camber is it's soft enough that way you could still press, and the graphics would be camo, but the camo patches would be images of outer space... fuck yeah...
I would die for
Something like a on3p Jeffery Proto,
Where they take the convex bases of the pillow fight and the rocker of
The pillow fight and add it to the Jeffery but keep its 110 waist. I got a feeling it would be such a amazingly fun ski to shred on