It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
The weight of a park ski does not matter that much. Don't buy a ski based on it's weight, it shouldn't even play a very big factor. But, Liberty LTEs are very very light and a sick ski!
the weight of the ski doesn't matter as much as where it's distrubuted in the ski. The afterbangs are heavy but very light in the tip and tail making it easier to spin.
Nah, it's the early taper and the ar50 sidewall that makes armada's alpha1/halo so light. The "lightness" of a park ski doesn't necessarily matter; it's where that weight is concentrated that makes them more easy or difficult to spin. A ski that weighs a little more but has the majority of its weight concentrated towards the center of the ski will spin much faster than a ski that weighs a little less and has its weight concentrated towards the tips and tails.
You really think your leg muscles can distinguish between 130 grams? Maybe your arms can but your leg muscles are obviously much larger and the difference between a "heavy" and "light" ski is so insignificant that it doesn't even matter. Same goes with binding weight. Swing weight on the other hand is important.
If she's does what she's supposed to then she's fine with me ;) but really, weight of your skis shouldn't matter, your muscles will become accustomed to them. Skis are skis, they ski
I've found every ski I've picked up in a shop unmounted to be extraordinarily light by feel. It's bindings that really make a ski heavy. Like most of these guys in the thread are saying, I wouldn't be worried about park ski weight.
HOWEVER. If you're buying a new pair of skis, and your going to be more oriented to rails and are torn between two different lengths of skis, then get the shorter pair to keep the swing weight down.
Halos in terms of feel, I'm gonna say Halos. They definitely feel lighter than any ski i've been on, not sure that was a good thing but there we go.
The actual weight differences in skis are tiny by the way. The variation in weights of skis of the same model (i.e two pairs of Anthems) is often as big a difference as between models, due to extra glue being left in one pair etc. I know I have 2 pairs of Lizzies 172 in my room (both now deceased). One pair is around 1,950 grams per ski and the other is around 2,150 per ski. The 200g covers most of the weight range difference across all park skis. You cannot tell the difference between the two pairs on your feet. The difference between a pair of Holden slim pants and some baggy ass Saga pants is more like 800g so if you want to save weight...
The only thing that matters is swingweight, construction does make a difference for this, the Chronics do feel like because of the lighter wood in the tips and length, taper make a noticeable difference. The big thing for swingweight though is width. Skinnier skis always feel lighter, assuming they are roughly symmetrical and centre mounted. The have less surface area and therefore less resistance in a spin. Afterbangs are actually quite heavy but they feel way lighter than my Lizzies in the air (despite that pair actually being heavier).