It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
I guess I was responding to his context of "intelligence." "Intellect" or "education" would have been more applicable.
While IQ does stand for Intelligence Quotient, it does not necessarily measure it. It is more so the combined effort of your ability, drive, and desire to process information. http://www.nytimes.com/1994/11/12/opinion/l-what-do-iq-tests-measure-not-intelligence-810185.html
except you used the definition of intelligence to define IQ, blatantly contradicting yourself
if you were trying to say what that article pointed out, then you should have said that early IQ measures the chance of success in a particular school system. however, that article was from 1994, cited information that regarded tests from 1914, and dont comment on the quality of modern IQ tests, which probably actually do a little better job of measuring what is considered intelligence