Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

U.S.=Roman Empire

profile picture
homestead
Posts: 2493 - Karma: 11
It may sound farfetched, but the United States is getting very close to what the Roman Empire was. The Roman Empire was very strong for a long period of time and was always the big dogs. We, as citizens of the United States, think that nothing will ever happen to us. This is what the Roman Empire thought. Their borders got so big it was difficult to protect and soon the rest of the surrounding Barbarians of Europe came together and took the giant down. Is this what is happening to us, right now? I sure hope not, but there are many similarites between the two.

Save Sugar Loaf! It's our resort, not just real estate.
Oct 22 2004 9:23PM
0 0
profile picture
wiglaf
Posts: 4877 - Karma: 141
wow your so right! shutup, someone already made a post on this like yesterday
`
Oct 22 2004 9:25PM
0 0
profile picture
PowderCanuck
Posts: 2626 - Karma: 10
i've heard a few similar comparisons.
You gotta admit there is a LOT of anti-american attitudes in the world. take france for example. But if everyone where to team up on the USA, it would NOT end like Rome. it would end like... nothing at all. it would be nuclear holocaust because everyone would send their missiles to the US and the US has enough missiles to send to pretty much everone else, so it would suck.

I don't think this could possible happen anytime soon, if at all, though.

for the record, I think the US is a cool country. I think Bush is a moron though.


_______________________

Screw this I'm going skiing
Oct 22 2004 9:28PM
0 0
profile picture
homestead
Posts: 2493 - Karma: 11
^i agree with you, except on the bush part. let me rephrase it. john kerry is an idiot

Save Sugar Loaf! It's our resort, not just real estate.
Oct 22 2004 9:30PM
0 0
profile picture
K_2
Posts: 1446 - Karma: 11
So if you compare US to the Roman Empire...then that means the Barbarians will be Canada and Mexico attacking US! ahahha.


'Canada first, Canada last, and Canada always'
Oct 22 2004 9:42PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,142
Interesting question: if every country on earth launched Nuclear weapons on the USA, and the country would be completely and utterly destroyed NO MATTER WHAT, should they counterattack against their aggressors, and destroy the rest of the world, or allow the rest to live, but remain unavenged? I'm interested to see the answers. Maybe I'll finally get an idea of peoples' ethics around here.

------------
In a haze
A stormy haze
I’ll be around
I’ll be loving you
Always
Always

Here I am
And I’ll take my time
Here I am
And I’ll wait in line
Always
Always...
Oct 22 2004 9:46PM
0 0
profile picture
PowderCanuck
Posts: 2626 - Karma: 10
A) because we got planes and jets now and fast boats now, the attackers won't be limited to your neighbours

B) remember the war of 1812? :)


_______________________

Screw this I'm going skiing
Oct 22 2004 9:48PM
0 0
profile picture
EastCoastPride
Posts: 11654 - Karma: 4,989
To answer JD_May's question; if I were president, this would be my thinking: if I'm going to go down in a fiery triangular explosion of Uranium-92, I'm going to make sure everyone else does the same.


JD_May. stop reading HERE.

everyone else: let's watch how angry and righteous he gets!


-teddy
WWTJSD?
Oct 22 2004 9:51PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,142
See, but you're not serious.

...I just realized how absolutely absurd it was for me to expect a serious answer to this question.

------------
In a haze
A stormy haze
I’ll be around
I’ll be loving you
Always
Always

Here I am
And I’ll take my time
Here I am
And I’ll wait in line
Always
Always...
Oct 22 2004 9:58PM
0 0
profile picture
murphski
Posts: 1259 - Karma: 13
so true^ no one is gonna answer that. if i were president and nuclear missles were headed towards my country. theres still the 2 hours the country has to hope. yes i would counter strike because america does not like to be pushed around. everyone knows that.
_______________________
powder to the people
pigtail productions
Oct 22 2004 10:57PM
0 0
profile picture
*Neil
Posts: 2591 - Karma: 75
if citizens of the u.s.a think nuthing will ever happen to them then why is bush's campaign based on fear...
---------------------------------------

---> www.powder11.com
Oct 22 2004 11:27PM
0 0
profile picture
mattwalker
Posts: 5063 - Karma: 2,478
nuke them back...


Siver Cartel.

High Society.

Scott USA.

Enom Headwear.

Sidewinder Sports.

'skiboarding is too hard for most people. i broke both of my legs and shattered my pelvis just strapping the leashes on.' - mommy
Oct 22 2004 11:33PM
0 0
profile picture
Apple
Posts: 7906 - Karma: 33
Rome didnt fall because their resourses were to far spread. Rome fell because of Christianity. As christiany became more wide spred, there were diffrent branches of christianaty. Rome, was of course Roman catholic and anyone who want roman catholic, even if they were still christian, was a heathen, or a barbarian. Most of the groups of people Rome was fighting wanted to be a part of rome because rome was strong, and would bring peace to their people. The goths for example who were christian, just not the same kind of christian would have liked nothing more than to be part of Rome. But Rome would not have them because they were heathens, so instead they fought them. Rome fell out of their own ignorance. They could have lived on, very strong IF they had been able to accept cultural diffrences.

-Thom Savery
please pardon the cacography
--->CCR*
Oct 22 2004 11:48PM
0 0
profile picture
fcskier27
Posts: 736 - Karma: 11
i say if 1 couintry nuked us, then nuke them back. but if a whole bunh of countries nuked us, then we obviously fucked up really bad, therefor we probably deserve it and shouldnt return fire. but thats just my 2 cents

summertime....and the livin's easy

oh well
Oct 23 2004 12:06AM
0 0
profile picture
ESB
Posts: 9274 - Karma: 10,648
The Roman Empire survived by expansion until it collapsed from within. We're still way too young to even begin to compare to Rome... once we've gone through a few emperorships (hence the term 'empire') and have annexed Canada, then we can start the Roman comparisons. Give it a couple hundred years, at least.

Wayne: 'I don't own a gun, let alone many guns that would necessitate the use of a rack. What am I going to do... with a gun rack?'
Oct 23 2004 12:13AM
0 0
profile picture
KootenayGuy
Posts: 1075 - Karma: 10
Well, theres alot of similarities between what the states have been doing in the middle east and what germany was doing in europe. Anyone whos got a History class or just knows their shit cant deny that theres a few. Sig Heil Busch!
-STARMAN DIED IN VAIN!
Oct 23 2004 2:40AM
0 0
profile picture
popopopop
Posts: 328 - Karma: 11
i would definately not fire any missiles back, but then im not american am i. (sorry to make a huge sweeping judgement there)
Oct 23 2004 5:03AM
0 0
profile picture
punk_rider
Posts: 2327 - Karma: 10
no, coz what detroyed Rome was its own decadence (makes sense in english). they no more believed in anything, and the sack of rome was the fact of the barbarinas who were paid to fight for rome. USA have still strong moral values. that's the reason why you must keep bush on power

*******************

PUNK'S NOT DEAD!
RAILS SUCK!
POWDER SKIING RULES!
DEATH TO SNOWBOARD-ERS!!
VOTE BUSH!!
Oct 23 2004 6:44AM
0 0
profile picture
Ahmets_Brother
Posts: 20283 - Karma: 5,931
im fuckin tired of these posts



dont go to new york. all it has to offer is i love ny stickers
member 9020
newbies are our future unless if we stop them now!
'dont fuck with me cause the last person that fucked with me....well they lived a pretty normal life'- misty7
'ok im gonnago play pocket tanks...the only game that runs on my computer'-cruz
'maybe i shold turn lesbien and get the girls'-misty7
'i can have sex with the snow'-misty7 on how winter will end his lonelyness
Oct 23 2004 7:06AM
0 0
profile picture
Trash
Posts: 682 - Karma: 10
We aren't that close to Rome yet, our roads aren't quite good enough yet. And there are no bath houses. Not until I can get naked in public will I consider this empire a success. We have nothing on Rome.
_
Oct 23 2004 8:47AM
0 0
profile picture
hellmut
Posts: 1460 - Karma: 29
Besides a sense of superiority in America today, I dont see much similarity between America and Rome. A better comparison would be britain when they ruled the seas.
Oct 23 2004 10:13AM
0 0
profile picture
SteveXs2
Posts: 7922 - Karma: 40
China is going to be the next military and economic power in the world.


-------------------

gethyped.net
azadadventures
shamesmountain
Oct 23 2004 10:18AM
0 0
profile picture
EastCoastPride
Posts: 11654 - Karma: 4,989
And the next Olympic power too. They have about 47 athletes in every sport because they want to dominate in Beijing in 2008.


-teddy
WWTJSD?
Oct 23 2004 4:57PM
0 0
profile picture
ATLANTASKI
Posts: 6009 - Karma: 11
rome had been a world power for over 700 years until it really started to decline, so if you want to compare to the Romans were about the time of Tiberius, nero(bad example) or maybe even augustus


KNUCK IF YOU BUCK BOY


CRIME MOB HOE
Oct 23 2004 6:16PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,142
''We aren't that close to Rome yet, our roads aren't quite good enough yet. And there are no bath houses. Not until I can get naked in public will I consider this empire a success.''

This was very sigworthy, and noone paid any attention.

------------
In a haze
A stormy haze
I’ll be around
I’ll be loving you
Always
Always

Here I am
And I’ll take my time
Here I am
And I’ll wait in line
Always
Always...
Oct 23 2004 6:18PM
0 0
profile picture
punk_rider
Posts: 2327 - Karma: 10
^^ haha! true! that was good!

*******************

PUNK'S NOT DEAD!
RAILS SUCK!
POWDER SKIING RULES!
DEATH TO SNOWBOARD-ERS!!
VOTE BUSH!!
Oct 24 2004 4:40AM
0 0
profile picture
-=koLLac=-
Posts: 4122 - Karma: 11
Another interesting post that has not been reacted to is ATLANTASKI's last one...the US would be at the time of Nero...haha, that's kind of ironic. Not just the fact that Nero was a freaky bisexual tyrant (I'm not homopobic...I just used that to closer define him), but Nero was followed by a series of other tyrants (not right after him though), which resulted inthe decision that the Senate would ELECT the emperor. would be interesting to see the US gov't detach itself from the public even more




*******************

EUROPE KICKS ASS
___________________
Useless Fact of the Moment:
'The starfish is one of the only animals who can turn it's stomach inside-out. '

^hahaha ONE of the ONLY ahahaha lmao
Oct 24 2004 10:57AM
0 0
profile picture
ATLANTASKI
Posts: 6009 - Karma: 11
yea, there wasnt a real good emperor in the early to mid 100 ADs, and nero was one fucked up dude.......i think were around the period of Augustus.. or maybe tiberius to think about it, 3 bc- 14 AD ish


KNUCK IF YOU BUCK BOY


CRIME MOB HOE
Oct 24 2004 12:11PM
0 0
profile picture
skibrdingbitch
Posts: 3990 - Karma: 20
ok so on one of my US government tests we had an essay question like what is our government based on and shit, so i just went off on how our government is based on roman government with consuls and everything, i was soo pissed off at my tecaher cuase she didn't teach us anything about how really our government is solely based off roman goverment, so i just contradicated her on everything she had said as what our government was based on. lets just say shhe didn't exactly like my essay


And it makes me see, every puff that I breathe, potent herbs and leaves could ease the world . . .
So, We roll and smoke and choke and- pass and toke and hand it back to ya.
Oct 24 2004 2:41PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,142
Roman republicanism is really, really different from the American model. The consuls were selected by the senate and from the senate body, not by or from the people. The senate itself was self-propogating; new members were selected by existing members. The only representatives of the people, the Tribunes, were not part of the original model (they were introduced hundreds of years later) and had only a mediating force on the other two governing powers. I can't see very much in common with the two systems, personally. There are perhaps some parallels to be drawn with the Athenian system under Pericles and such leaders, but again, there are significant differences; their system was more direct and far less centralized, and would be impractical today.

------------
In a haze
A stormy haze
I’ll be around
I’ll be loving you
Always
Always

Here I am
And I’ll take my time
Here I am
And I’ll wait in line
Always
Always...
Oct 24 2004 2:50PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,142
Wow... I'm not thinking at all right now. Mediating was totally the wrong word to use there. The tribunes had some influence on decision processes, but certainly nothing that came anywhere near a complete control. The system itself prevented the Tribunes from exerting too much influence.

------------
In a haze
A stormy haze
I’ll be around
I’ll be loving you
Always
Always

Here I am
And I’ll take my time
Here I am
And I’ll wait in line
Always
Always...
Oct 24 2004 2:53PM
0 0
profile picture
*Neil
Posts: 2591 - Karma: 75
You guyz are lookign at this topic all wrong. the similarites between the Roman Empire and the U.S.A are
1.Accelerating Social and Economic inequality
2.Loss of entitlements
3.Decline of intellectual abilities
4.Spiritual death
---------------------------------------

---> www.powder11.com
Oct 24 2004 2:57PM
0 0
profile picture
timbojones
Posts: 572 - Karma: 10
Yeah I've heard this argument before. Another good point to take into conciteration, is that alot of Roman leaders worshiped the gods of money and sex. Which are probably two of the most popular things to the american public. If you are ever in Boston go to the public library, there is this painting of Appolo shooting an arrow at the god of money, but the arrow turns into a snake. the tale goes on with the advancement of the gods of sex and money to rule. In my opinion its not all false.

-Timbo
Oct 24 2004 2:58PM
0 0
profile picture
-=koLLac=-
Posts: 4122 - Karma: 11
eh...some wrong numbers and dates from whoever posted after me...there were no emperors prior to 27 bc...nero was definitely AD. The first emperor Augustus Aurelius was 'crowned' in 27 bc and reigned till 14 AD...If I remeber correctly Nero was around in the 60's AD...




*******************

EUROPE KICKS ASS
___________________
Useless Fact of the Moment:
'The starfish is one of the only animals who can turn it's stomach inside-out. '

^hahaha ONE of the ONLY ahahaha lmao
Oct 24 2004 7:27PM
0 0
profile picture
bigJ
Posts: 3148 - Karma: 10
I am sorry but we really aren't a lot like Rome, if anything in the modern world would even hold a candle to the Roman Empire would be Britain during its Imperialistic hight.

Really when you are talking about the massive extent of the British Empire you are talking about a lot more land and civilizations then the US could even rival. Class differences were gigantic, the difference between the Aristocracy and Proletariat was immense. When it comes to war Britain doesn't even rival us, I believe that in the last century they have been at peace for only one year.





Politicaly Active Since 1992

'Soberity is not an option.'

Drivin that Train
Oct 24 2004 7:39PM
0 0
profile picture
flippintricker
Posts: 2408 - Karma: 9
idealistically, sure
but an empire, the states is not



To understand mankind, we must first understand the word. We can break the word down into two sub-words, 'mank' and 'ind'.What these two words mean is a mystery, just like mankind itself.
Oct 24 2004 7:46PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)